Chiefs Practice Squad Announced, Richardson Waived. - Page 9

'Hamas' Jenkins · 07:30 PM

Leave one spot open for Richardson if he clears waivers:

CB Jackie Bates
TE Tom Crabtree
DE Dion Gales
G Darryl Harris
RB Javarris Williams
WR Rodney Wright
Bobby Greenwood
TBD New England/Dallas/Miami Castoff or Barry Richardson

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2009/09...g_and_dealing/

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-06-2009, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

Are you saying we should have cut down to 40 players and put in 10+ waiver claims? Does anyone do that? Ever?

And do you really think the moves are over?

You don't cut down and leave your ass in the wind, but you probably should be taking a look at the guys on other people's PS's while they are out there and you have #3 waiver priority and they can't do anything about it.

Now if we try to claim anyone on the PS, they can be yanked back and activated.

It's like we decided to announce a frontal assault to the enemy when their entire left flank was exposed.

ChiefaRoo · 09-06-2009, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach

I understand that, but at the same time, he has proven that during pre-season where he has failed. And again, the general consensus, and I'm sure you would agree to a point, that our offensive line was the weak point at the end of last season. What did the Chiefs do, to upgrad that positions, outside of obtaining Goff?

Brown? He's IR'ed, so he's lost for the season.

Pioli traded a day 2 pick for two offensive linemen from Miami, who were 3rd stringers. I'm not so sure that's improving.

And the Chiefs are getting rid of two guys, who are 23 and 25 respectively? You shouldn't really be getting rid of young offensive linemen, especially when they were day two picks (both were sixth rounders). And we have currently, as far as I know, 8 guys are active on the offensive line.

That's not good.

With all that being said, have the Chiefs "improved" their line? My answer?

"No."

Let's just see what happens over the course of the season.

**dirk digler** · 09-06-2009, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Again:

Of all the guys who were cut in the roster reductions, is Ryan O'Callaghan really the only one who is worth a waiver claim? Is he the only guy who can improve our team?

We all know this team has shit for talent, so why not try and accumulate some?

Maybe they don't feel another team's trash is their treasure unless it comes from NE.

Micjones · 09-06-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger

damn lions claimed Figurs.

Dexter jackson is still out there.

So is Justin Miller?

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-06-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

It's just the meccas and hamas' that "break down film" (and by that, they cherry pick from scouting boards and form opinions based off of expert opinions) and then can't get over it 5 months after the fact...so every little thing turns back into a pissing match...(although I know longer hear the Tyson Jackson crying after he flashed some serious potential in the preseason)...

These guys loved the PICK THE "EXPERTS" BPA draft fest 2008 (I seriously think Kuharich and Herm and whoever else in charge just drafted off of Mayock's top 100 list)...and that draft turned into a...what? A C draft...yaaay.

You really should never call out anyone's takes on anything. You know absolutely less than nothing, and you felt compelled to poison the entire draft thread by trolling, offering no opinion and take other than a robotic "I trust everything the new regime does".

The point of this website is supposed to be about discussing football. To do that, one must have opinions, but it's always the dumbest mother****ers who want everyone else's opinions silenced, whatever the walk of life, because the experience of thinking hurts them.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-06-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

I just think it's complete and utter bullshit Hamas and Mecca weren't hired as scouts...or even a GM tandem.

Mother **** you Clark!

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

If I had a child like you I would have skinned it alive with a potato peeler. Your father should be tried in the Hague for crimes against humanity for not sucking you out of your mother's **** with a Shop-Vac when he had the chance.

"THE TREND IS
DEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEAD"!

THANK...****IN'... GOD.

kstater · 09-06-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach

I understand that, but at the same time, he has proven that during pre-season where he has failed. And again, the general consensus, and I'm sure you would agree to a point, that our offensive line was the weak point at the end of last season. What did the Chiefs do, to upgrad that positions, outside of obtaining Goff?

Brown? He's IR'ed, so he's lost for the season.

Pioli traded a day 2 pick for two offensive linemen from Miami, who were 3rd stringers. I'm not so sure that's improving.

And the Chiefs are getting rid of two guys, who are 23 and 25 respectively? You shouldn't really be getting rid of young offensive linemen, especially when they were day two picks (both were sixth rounders). And we have currently, as far as I know, 8 guys are active on the offensive line. Of course, I am glad we used one pick on Williams, instead of O-line.

With all that being said, have the Chiefs "improved" their line? My answer?

"No."

Revisionist history. At the end of last year, the defense and the d-line itself had the least amount of sacks in NFL history. Period. It's been pretty clear that the defense was the priority in year 1.

splatbass · 09-06-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Wait, the Chiefs are going to suck this year?

Now that they've cut Richardson they will!

booger · 09-06-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

So is Justin Miller?

Still a FA as far as i Know. Not elligable for waivers.

IIRC though he is just a KR not PR. and not a very good CB.

But his KR numbers are impressive.

**dirk digler** · 09-06-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

It's just the meccas and hamas' that "break down film" (and by that, they cherry pick from scouting boards and form opinions based off of expert opinions) and then can't get over it 5 months after the fact...so every little thing turns back into a pissing match...(although I know longer hear the Tyson Jackson crying after he flashed some serious potential in the preseason)...

These guys loved the PICK THE "EXPERTS" BPA draft fest 2008 (I seriously think Kuharich and Herm and whoever else in charge just drafted off of Mayock's top 100 list)...and that draft turned into a...what? A C draft...yaaay.

why do you have to shit on every thread that involves one of them in it? Why don't you just ignore them or go away. Some people like to hear different sides and you always seem to make things way to personal.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-06-2009, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Revisionist history. At the end of last year, the defense and the d-line itself had the least amount of sacks in NFL history. Period. It's been pretty clear that the defense was the priority in year 1.

That is a fair point, but it's not like we have one experience point to allocate to either defense or offense this year, and can choose only one.

**Reaper16** · 09-06-2009, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

These guys loved the PICK THE "EXPERTS" BPA draft fest 2008 (I seriously think Kuharich and Herm and whoever else in charge just drafted off of Mayock's top 100 list)...and that draft turned into a...what? A C draft...yaaay.

**** that. Two starting CB, the best RB on the roster, a spectacularly talented LT... that's better than a C draft.

Coach · 09-06-2009, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Revisionist history. At the end of last year, the defense and the d-line itself had the least amount of sacks in NFL history. Period. It's been pretty clear that the defense was the priority in year 1.

And that's fine. I am in favor of improving the defense, considering that they had the new NFL record of least sacks in a single season. You are correct, I am not denying that.

However, it still does not change the fact that the Chiefs continued to ignore the other weakness of the team, the offensive line. And it makes me even more upsetting that they drafted Williams, who just got cut, instead of a O-line.

And I'm not in favor of releasing offensive linemen who has something to show and retaining offensive linemen who are on a decline or has no talent at all.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-06-2009, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

**** that. Two starting CB, the best RB on the roster, a spectacularly talented DT that we refuse to play in the kind of scheme he is meant for... that's better than a C draft.

And a franchise left tackle.

Mr. Krab · 09-06-2009, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

people complain that we aren't changing the roster

and then when we change the roster they complain that we're changing the roster

it has no talent and herm's players suck, but if you cut one of herm's players after giving him playing time well then you're a clueless asshole and round and round it goes...

People are frustrated because they keep hearing about how we suck and all our players suck. If all our player suck then surely we can improve the team fairly easy with all these player getting cut.

Then when we do cut players we don't even cut our suckiest and we wonder WTF?!?

09-06-2009, 05:51 PM
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7129572	Practice Squad Announced, Richardson Waived. Leave one spot open for Richardson if he clears waivers: CB Jackie Bates TE Tom Crabtree DE Dion Gales G Darryl Harris RB Javarris Williams WR Rodney Wright Bobby Greenwood TBD New England/Dallas/Miami Castoff or Barry Richardson http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2009/09...g_and_dealing/ Last edited by 'Hamas' Jenkins; 09-06-2009 at 07:30 PM..
Posts: 75,083