Chiefs Croyle haters, eat up - Page 10

Hammock Parties · 09-13-2009, 02:30 PM

All of you were wrong.

Mother****er can flat out BALL.

Hammock Parties · 09-13-2009, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR

Your opinion is noted, it's rejected due to actual facts, but it's noted.

What?

The actual FACTS are that Thigpen looked like complete shit this preseason and Croyle took his job.

All you need to know about Thigpen is that when he went into the game, they ran a draw, handed the ball off, and then ran a pitch.

The Chiefs are probably scared shitless of him actually throwing a pass against a team like the Ravens.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-13-2009, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

What?

The actual FACTS are that Thigpen looked like complete shit this preseason and Croyle took his job.

All you need to know about Thigpen is that when he went into the game, they ran a draw, handed the ball off, and then ran a pitch.

The Chiefs are probably scared shitless of him actually throwing a pass against a team like the Ravens.

Your facts are noted, and accepted as facts.

Norman Einstein · 09-13-2009, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

What?

The actual FACTS are that Thigpen looked like complete shit this preseason and Croyle took his job.

All you need to know about Thigpen is that when he went into the game, they ran a draw, handed the ball off, and then ran a pitch.

The Chiefs are probably scared shitless of him actually throwing a pass against a team like the Ravens.

Your memory is as short as your attention span. Croyle was pulled from the game because the HC felt he was ****ing up. Thigpen wasn't supposed to do anything other than what he did.

Your facts basically moot, no QB goes into the game cold with virtually no snaps during the week and throws a pass. Get your head out of your ass and get a grip on reality.

Norman Einstein · 09-13-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Your facts are noted, and accepted as facts.

What are you? gogoat's girlfriend?

Hammock Parties · 09-13-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR

Your facts basically moot

The fact that Croyle beat out Thigpen this year is moot?

Give me a ****ing break.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-13-2009, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR

What are you? gogoat's girlfriend?

No, I just hate your boyfriend. Because he sucks and has no place on an NFL roster.

The truth hurts; deal with it.

chiefzilla1501 · 09-13-2009, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

No, I just hate your boyfriend. Because he sucks and has no place on an NFL roster.

The truth hurts; deal with it.

And yet, Thigpen is active and Gutterrez isn't.

I don't understand why you hate the guy so much. He's clearly the #3 QB on this roster, but your claim that he doesn't belong on any roster is really ****ing ridiculous. Haley/Pioli seem to disagree, and it's pretty clear they haven't played favorites this season.

Norman Einstein · 09-13-2009, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

No, I just hate your boyfriend. Because he sucks and has no place on an NFL roster.

The truth hurts; deal with it.

I would think you were smarter than the average asshole but it looks like you are a massive fail.

Must suck to be you.

Your inability to judge talent in ball players probably is second only to your 6 years in the 2nd grade.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-13-2009, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

And yet, Thigpen is active and Gutterrez isn't.

I don't understand why you hate the guy so much. He's clearly the #3 QB on this roster, but your claim that he doesn't belong on any roster is really ****ing ridiculous. Haley/Pioli seem to disagree, and it's pretty clear they haven't played favorites this season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR

I would think you were smarter than the average asshole but it looks like you are a massive fail.

Must suck to be you.

Your inability to judge talent in ball players probably is second only to your 6 years in the 2nd grade.

St. Louis.

chiefzilla1501 · 09-13-2009, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR

I would think you were smarter than the average asshole but it looks like you are a massive fail.

Must suck to be you.

Your inability to judge talent in ball players probably is second only to your 6 years in the 2nd grade.

Dude, I like Tyler Thigpen too, but I don't understand what you're arguing about here. Croyle played well given the shitty offensive line support today. Thigpen is a long way behind in terms of learning a pro style offense--he looked better today, but in the preseason, it was clear he needed some work on his mechanics and footwork.

There's nothing to argue here. Croyle started, as he should have. And he did well given the circumstances.

TRR · 09-13-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

All of you were wrong.

Mother****er can flat out BALL.

Croyle could have thrown for 400 yards today and won the game, and it wouldn't matter. Croyle is to fragile to be a starting QB in the NFL. He proved that last season.

Brodie has talent...as does nearly every QB in the league...problem is most other QB's aren't made of glass like Croyle is.

Everyone can talk about Croyle's arm strength, etc...The bottom line is and always will be how fragile he is.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-13-2009, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR

Croyle could have thrown for 400 yards today and won the game, and it wouldn't matter. Croyle is to fragile to be a starting QB in the NFL. He proved that last season.

Brodie has talent...as does nearly every QB in the league...problem is most other QB's aren't made of glass like Croyle is.

Everyone can talk about Croyle's arm strength, etc...The bottom line is and always will be how fragile he is.
Posted via Mobile Device

He's been tougher and stronger this year, that you can not deny. And I'll go out on a limb and say that I DO feel comfortable with him at #2, and I trust him at #2.
And unlike Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen, Croyle has shown us he can function in a pro style offense, and doesn't need a ****ing college offensive scheme to make something happen.

The days of that Mickey Mouse Spread-horseshit are OVER with the Kansas City Chiefs, and that makes Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen an expendable asset.
Good riddance and case..****ing..closed.

NEXT!

chiefzilla1501 · 09-13-2009, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

He's been tougher and stronger this year, that you can not deny. And I'll go out on a limb and say that I DO feel comfortable with him at #2, and I trust him at #2.
And unlike Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen, Croyle has shown us he can function in a pro style offense, and doesn't need a ****ing college offensive scheme to make something happen.

The days of that Mickey Mouse Spread-horseshit are OVER with the Kansas City Chiefs, and that makes Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen an expendable asset.
Good riddance and case..****ing..closed.

NEXT!

Croyle has always been tough. I just don't understand how one healthy game suddenly makes him less injury prone. Healthy QBs stay healthy for multiple FULL SEASONS. How does one game change that? Croyle's a good QB, but he'll never shake the injury thing. He's suffered 2 season-ending injuries in only 5 seasons as a starter (college and pro) and he's had three major injuries that either sidelined him for a few games or forced to play at less than 100%.

As for Thigpen, again, he's active on the Chiefs' roster, while Matt Gutterrez is not. You keep making this claim that the Chiefs don't want him, and yet he's still on the roster while guys like Pollard and Taylor or not.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-13-2009, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Croyle has always been tough. I just don't understand how one healthy game suddenly makes him less injury prone. Healthy QBs stay healthy for multiple FULL SEASONS. How does one game change that? Croyle's a good QB, but he'll never shake the injury thing. He's suffered 2 season-ending injuries in only 5 seasons as a starter (college and pro) and he's had three major injuries that either sidelined him for a few games or forced to play at less than 100%.

As for Thigpen, again, he's active on the Chiefs' roster, while Matt Gutterrez is not. You keep making this claim that the Chiefs don't want him, and yet he's still on the roster while guys like Pollard and Taylor or not.

Slim pickin's as far as replacements go. Hell, Thigpen can stay at number three and rot for all I care. The chances of us having to use him are slim to none when Cassel is healthy.

chiefzilla1501 · 09-13-2009, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Slim pickin's as far as replacements go. Hell, Thigpen can stay at number three and rot for all I care. The chances of us having to use him are slim to none when Cassel is healthy.

But people on this board keep suggesting that Thigpen has no place on an NFL roster and that Gutterrez was easily the choice for #3. And yet, Thigpen is the active one while Gutterrez is not.

I know Thigpen isn't that good right now. I just can't stand the exaggeration that he doesn't belong on an NFL roster. I think #3 QB is perfect for him too. Haley's said they've been working with him on his footwork and on playing in a pro set. I just don't understand why people are so opposed to him getting that chance to learn it.

09-13-2009, 02:30 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $810478	Croyle haters, eat up All of you were wrong. Mother****er can flat out BALL.
Posts: 297,429