Chiefs Tyson Jackson - Page 12

Halfcan · 09-20-2009, 04:03 PM

one tackle today WOW!!!!

**dirk digler** · 09-20-2009, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

The reality is, in spite of the poor play calling by the Raiders, when the Raiders did try to run, they had little success.

The fact that we didn't get gashed consistently even after the Raiders didn't come out running the ball on the very first series is a positive.

Now, can we biuild on that going forward?

Probably not, because we still don't have the rihgt piseces for this defnse to succeeed.

Yep. When we face a team that runs the ball good and has a good QB then we will be able to tell if we keep improving or we just suck until we get better players.

**KcMizzou** · 09-20-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I said the same god damn thing, that picking a 34 DE is a bad pick, and poor positional value, you dumbass.

But that doesn't in any discount the fact that he is a ****ing rookie, learning a new position in a new scheme.

It also doesn't discount the fact that he actually did his job reasonably well, given those facts.

As a 34 DE, he is never, I repeat, so your dumbass has just the slightest chance to understand, he is never going to put up big tackle numbers as a 34 DE.

3 or 4 in a game will be a huge number for his poistion.

JFC, get a ****ing clue.

Don't hold your breath.

**1ChiefsDan** · 09-20-2009, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

It doesn't surprise me that you're too stupid to get the point. The point is that people will do anything to look for positives here, and today it's the fact that our D was stopping the run, when the reality is that Tom Cable stopped the run.

Yep, always with the "you're too stupid". It is your only response and it is tired and old. Oxygen deprivation at birth is a hard thing to overcome. Good luck with that.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-20-2009, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

No one is comparing the Chiefs D to the 85 Bears or the great Steeler defenses. What we are saying is that all these dire predictions about the Raiders rushing for 300 yds were a little over done. Also as someone posted already the Raiders had almost the same pass to rush ratio as they did against the Chargers. We stopped the run we just couldn't stop Russell when it counted and that is all that really matters.

No one is arguing that the 300 yard predictions were correct, or that they weren't rooted in some hyperbole just for the **** of trolling.

TheGuardian · 09-20-2009, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I said the same god damn thing, that picking a 34 DE is a bad pick, and poor positional value, you dumbass.

But that doesn't in any discount the fact that he is a ****ing rookie, learning a new position in a new scheme.

It also doesn't discount the fact that he actually did his job reasonably well, given those facts.

As a 34 DE, he is never, I repeat, so your dumbass has just the slightest chance to understand, he is never going to put up big tackle numbers as a 34 DE.

3 or 4 in a game will be a huge number for his poistion.

JFC, get a ****ing clue.

Exactly. Dorsey played a WHALE of a game today and had 4 tackles I think? But he stuffed the run lanes down on his side and made that really heady stoppage of a screen that had all sorts of green in front of it if he doesn't make that play.

Dorsey already look like a different player than last year, and Jackson probably has a higher ceiling than Dorsey in this defense. People bitching about him after two games because he doesn't have high tackle numbers aren't worth wasting your breath on MM.

Halfcan · 09-20-2009, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I said the same god damn thing, that picking a 34 DE is a bad pick, and poor positional value, you dumbass.

But that doesn't in any discount the fact that he is a ****ing rookie, learning a new position in a new scheme.

It also doesn't discount the fact that he actually did his job reasonably well, given those facts.

As a 34 DE, he is never, I repeat, so your dumbass has just the slightest chance to understand, he is never going to put up big tackle numbers as a 34 DE.

3 or 4 in a game will be a huge number for his poistion.

JFC, get a ****ing clue.

So how in **** did he do his job resonably well again??? Jafatass had all day to throw today. I was at the game and specifically tried to watch our new #3. He didnt do much at all. Rookie or not. What the **** did he do last week besides not having one single tackle??? Flacco could have balanced his checkbook and they gashed the shit out of us on the run.

You are arguing that he is doing good when he has 1 damm tackle in two losses. 31 million dollar check in the bank and 1 tackle to his stats. You are just being a dick for the sake of being a dick right now.

kstater · 09-20-2009, 06:18 PM

Titty Meat · 09-20-2009, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Don't lump Hamas with Billay.

While Hamas might have some differing opinions, he's not dumb.

Sucking his dick won't earn you any points. Now go back to square dancing cornfed.

Halfcan · 09-20-2009, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

,

wow havnt seen tht dipshit on here for awhile

Titty Meat · 09-20-2009, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

Wow. So 2 games in and Tyson Jackson is already a bust.

Just when you think some of the people on this board can't get any more reeruned.

And Hamas and Billay are the two dumbest MF'ers on this site. End of discussion.

It isn't too late for you to join the rest of Heavens Gate moron.

**doomy3** · 09-20-2009, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

wow havnt seen tht dipshit on here for awhile

You haven't seen that dipshit Hamas on here for awhile?

Halfcan · 09-20-2009, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

So? You're basing your whole basis on stats ALONE. That doesn't really tell you anything about how good or bad Jackson played in this style of defense does it? No. But you don't seem to understand that.

No I am baseing it on watching him play today.