|
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10005450
|
This particular call was a Personal foul due to a defenseless WR. It was not helmet to helmet and was not called helmet to helmet. Defenseless WR is when you go above the shoulder pads, but it can be your shoulder pad to their head.
Regardless, it was a piss poor call. I think it set the tone for the defense early. With that, the Charles fumble and the onsides kick coming out of the half.... it is amazing the Chiefs were only down 17 points. |
Posts: 5,540
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mo
Casino cash: $9903836
|
Quote:
http://chiefsblog.kansascity.com/?q=node/1024 |
|
Posts: 812
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10005450
|
Quote:
Still dissagree. I saw the play, saw the ref make the call. I don't think they ever thought it was helmet to helmet. Just that Page went high. It was clear he didn't lead with his helmet even in real time. |
|
Posts: 5,540
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mo
Casino cash: $9903836
|
That's fine if you want to disagree but the facts state otherwise. It doens't really matter in the grand scheme of things. To be a good team you have to step up when you get adversity and that is something the Chiefs do not do.
|
Posts: 812
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|