Chiefs Clean Slate With The Draftubators - Page 11

philfree · 10-14-2009, 07:19 PM

I didn't make up the term but it's an easy reference. I just want to clear my own personal air with you guys. Mecca, chief redeyes, Dane ect.....I just want to say I value you guy's opinions.

PhilFree

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2009, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

On another defense, he would have help and better sack numbers and be known as one of the better players in the league. Not 'great'... but more than 'complimentary'. Even now, you are chewing the edges trying to play both sides... not really admit you were wrong, but act like you are big enough to give the guy credit.

When you have only one good pass rusher, it is pretty easy to neutralize him. Especially when the guy on the other side has no hope of getting there.

I wasn't "wrong", ****STICK.

He's pretty easy to "neutralize" due to his flat-feet and not so nimble moves.

Again, Dumbass, he's not a ****ing Pro Bowl player. He's just someone you have to account for each week.

Unlike the other 10 guys on the field.

**dirk digler** · 10-15-2009, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You're ****ing stupid. And wrong. And just plain dumb.

I went through 4 pages of replies using the Advanced Search. NO WHERE did I state that Hali would "suck" or that he'd be "terrible" or anything of the sort.

Some of other guys were very hard on him but hell, I even got into it with Sauto when defending Hali as an average player.

Please pull your deformed head out of your oversized ass.

And then shut the **** up.

You are wrong as usual

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Who's going to get the sacks? Hali?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Hali is awesome.

Herm old me.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-15-2009, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I wasn't "wrong", ****STICK.

He's pretty easy to "neutralize" due to his flat-feet and not so nimble moves.

Again, Dumbass, he's not a ****ing Pro Bowl player. He's just someone you have to account for each week.

Unlike the other 10 guys on the field.

Why do you think the other team has to account for him?

Cuz he's just 'complimentary'.....

Bringing up his flat feet and not so nimble moves....lol.

Funny, he was in on a three man rush that actually got pressure on Romo. Amazing, what with his flat feet and not so nimble moves.

He gets doubled and he still has to play his coverage responsibilities in base defense. And, he still gets pressure regularly.

I don't go through threads to prove what other people said. Frankly, I don't have the time.

But, even now, you don't give him the credit that he is due.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-15-2009, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

You are wrong as usual

Big surprise.... color me shocked.

**dirk digler** · 10-15-2009, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Big surprise.... color me shocked.

The draftubators have never been right about anything except guessing each other's colored underwear

L.A. Chieffan · 10-15-2009, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

The draftubators have never been right about anything except guessing each other's colored underwear

They (me) weren't right about Jackson being a stupid ****ing pick at #3?

Wait for it.....

''THERE WASN'T ANYBODY ELSE THERE FOR US!"

"IT'S TOO EARLY TO TELL!"

''THIS DRAFT SUXED!"

Mr. Laz · 10-15-2009, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

blasted in the chin by their large drafturbating buhkakke shots.

jidar · 10-15-2009, 10:13 AM

Is that what a drafturbator is? Someone who argues about the draft?

I've been using the term to mean someone who overvalues draft picks, usually at the expense of current players.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-15-2009, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

The draftubators have never been right about anything except guessing each other's colored underwear

I see why guys are just so annoyed with them. They are a bunch of self important jerks who take turns dutch ruddering each other on a pointless fan message board.

Even still, they have had good points at times. They just really have an inflated opinion of themselves and devalue any opinion that is not in line with their own.

jidar · 10-15-2009, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

They (me) weren't right about Jackson being a stupid ****ing pick at #3?

Wait for it.....

''THERE WASN'T ANYBODY ELSE THERE FOR US!"

"IT'S TOO EARLY TO TELL!"

''THIS DRAFT SUXED!"

So it's established that Jackson was a stupid pick?

L.A. Chieffan · 10-15-2009, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar

That's established that Jackson was a stupid pick?

you think it was a good pick?

**dirk digler** · 10-15-2009, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

I see why guys are just so annoyed with them. They are a bunch of self important jerks who take turns dutch ruddering each other on a pointless fan message board.

Even still, they have had good points at times. They just really have an inflated opinion of themselves and devalue any opinion that is not in line with their own.

They rudder each other all right. They each take turns with each other except for NoNutz he is the designated catcher I am sure you can guess why.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-15-2009, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

They (me) weren't right about Jackson being a stupid ****ing pick at #3?

Wait for it.....

''THERE WASN'T ANYBODY ELSE THERE FOR US!"

"IT'S TOO EARLY TO TELL!"

''THIS DRAFT SUXED!"

Okay, I have not been 'enamored' with the Jackson pick.

The difference is that I at least try to understand where the team is going, and why they do what they do.

Is he who I would have chosen? No. But, do I understand why they did it? Do I think they had better options? Yes. Do I think he is a huge mistake? No. A huge bust? No.

The thing about Herm and Pioli... they would rather draft guys that like football over a guy that has more talent who isn't as motivated.

A guy like DJ or Ryan Sims will never be drafted by Pioli. Now, Jackson may never be a superstar... but he is a high effort player.

You have to draft guys that love the game, and it is even better if you can draft guys that love to work at the game. There is a difference.

And, there are many guys who only play for the money and fame. And, IF those guys don't have success, they are more likely to put less into it rather than more.

The other kind of kid is determined. If they don't have success they work harder.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2009, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

You are wrong as usual

Hey, **** you, Asswipe.

How many sacks does Hali have through 5 games?

TWO.

TWO through 5 games.

Wow, that's amazing.

Go **** yourself.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2009, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

They rudder each other all right. They each take turns with each other except for NoNutz he is the designated catcher I am sure you can guess why.

Yeah, and you're such a contributor around here.

You're ****ing more worthless than that sack of shit you just quoted.

Go back to the DC and spew some more of your patented bullshit, okay?

Leave the football talk to those who actually know something about the game.

Cockbreath.

NTTATWWT.

10-14-2009, 07:19 PM
philfree Indian Twitter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Free Agency Casino cash: $-2223802	Clean Slate With The Draftubators I didn't make up the term but it's an easy reference. I just want to clear my own personal air with you guys. Mecca, chief redeyes, Dane ect.....I just want to say I value you guy's opinions. PhilFree
Posts: 16,155

10-15-2009, 10:13 AM	#158
jidar MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: a Casino cash: $10004900	Is that what a drafturbator is? Someone who argues about the draft? I've been using the term to mean someone who overvalues draft picks, usually at the expense of current players.
Posts: 5,502