Football Sanchez? - Page 28

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 04:45 PM

Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-18-2009, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

12-20, or thereaboust.

But it's great, cuz you never have to refresh.

And Dane, there is apparently an ignore function there.

Thanks. I'll check it out next week.

While it was nice to watch the Chiefs win, it would have been much nicer without all the obnoxious noise coming from his direction.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

That is a fair take Hamas.

But in all honesty I don't think Sanchez was ever in the mind Pioli. During his very first pc he said Matt was a special person and player. I knew right then he would be our QB.

Regardless of whether or not he was "in his mind", he's a player. A player at the most important position. One which the Chiefs didn't have and had access to. And he sought another player. That has to be considered in the evaluation of him.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-18-2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

So far this year Sanchez has looked a lot, lot better than Manning did his rookie year. And Manning had a great O-line, Marvin Harrison, and Marshall Faulk.

Just a little....err.... a lot of revisionist history there.

Coach · 10-18-2009, 08:30 PM

Looks like this thread lost it's burst.....

chiefzilla1501 · 10-18-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I'm not asking you to admit your wrong, I'm asking you not to stoop to the level of these other mouthbreathers who make bogus claims, and aren't willing to, or can't back them up. You made a claim that could be called hyperbolic at best, and flat out bullshit at worst. When called on it, you backed away. That's weak, and you're better than that, IMO.

And Lemon Pie pretty much has the pulse of this whole situation - there are numerous posters that troll, just looking to bait a certain handful of Sanchez backers.

I didn't back away from it. To prove your point, I have to comb through threads and find the exact page where the thread swerved. I'm not going to do that and it's unreasonable to expect me to.

And as I've said many times, the blame goes both ways. Pro Sanchez and anti-Sanchez. I've never said that pro Sanchez supporters are the only ones doing this.

It's not hyperbolic at best. Milkman brought up the point that anytime anybody did a critique of Cassel, there was always a Sanchez supporter to swerve the thread into a comparison to Sanchez. I don't see why I have to do the research on that when it's completely common sense.

And I don't see why I have to do the research on the idea that Sanchez supporters didn't use every available opportunity to point out on a ton of threads the comparison between Sanchez vs. Cassel when Sanchez was 2-0 and Cassel was 0-1, and Sanchez was 3-0 and Cassel was 0-2.

I don't care if you think it's a cop-out. I think it's a huge waste of time to search for a half hour to argue against a common sense claim. If you honestly believe that any "pro Sanchez" discussion came about because they were baited by an anti-Sanchez person, that's a pretty one-sided accusation.

**dirk digler** · 10-18-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I agree.

But Pioli's scope has been pretty ****ing narrow thus far.

Very true.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Regardless of whether or not he was "in his mind", he's a player. A player at the most important position. One which the Chiefs didn't have and had access to. And he sought another player. That has to be considered in the evaluation of him.

I don't have a problem with that. But at the same time I think Pioli should be given time to build his team without people freaking out. But today's NFL fan has very little patience.

Marcellus · 10-18-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Just a little....err.... a lot of revisionist history there.

Did Manning throw 5 picks in a game his rookie year?

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I didn't back away from it. To prove your point, I have to comb through threads and find the exact page where the thread swerved. I'm not going to do that and it's unreasonable to expect me to.

And as I've said many times, the blame goes both ways. Pro Sanchez and anti-Sanchez.

It's not hyperbolic at best. Milkman brought up the point that anytime anybody did a critique of Cassel, there was always a Sanchez supporter to swerve the thread into a comparison to Sanchez. I don't see why I have to do the research on that when it's completely common sense.

And I don't see why I have to do the research on the idea that Sanchez supporters didn't use every available opportunity to point out on a ton of threads the comparison between Sanchez vs. Cassel when Sanchez was 2-0 and Cassel was 0-1, and Sanchez was 3-0 and Cassel was 0-2.

I don't care if you think it's a cop-out. I think it's a huge waste of time to search for a half hour to argue against a common sense claim.

That is absolutely not true. Milkman said every time he critiqued Cassel someone jumped his nuts about wanting Sanchez.

SenselessChiefsFan · 10-18-2009, 08:32 PM

Sanchez went to a dream situation. Even today, he had 200 yards of run support and still managed to lose the game.

Unheard of. Five picks, ahead most of the game, and 200 yards of run support? Crazy.

He is a rookie, and he will get better.... but if the Chiefs had drafted Sanchez.... they would be 0-6 and Sanchez would look like a bust.

stevieray · 10-18-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

But not nearly as hilarious as dressing up as a dead man that died on the toilet for a sporting event.

Seeing as you're getting old are you going to update and become fat Elvis?

ironic coming from the guy who is fifty pounds overweight...old? wanna wager I'm in better shape twenty years older?

people who like/dislike Elvis:

Eleventy billion>100

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-18-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

That is absolutely not true. Milkman said every time he critiqued Cassel someone jumped his nuts about wanting Sanchez.

Exactly.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Sanchez went to a dream situation. Even today, he had 200 yards of run support and still managed to lose the game.

Unheard of. Five picks, ahead most of the game, and 200 yards of run support? Crazy.

He is a rookie, and he will get better.... but if the Chiefs had drafted Sanchez.... they would be 0-6 and Sanchez would look like a bust.

False choice. No one would argue that he should start behind this line. He's too young.

Marcellus · 10-18-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I didn't back away from it. To prove your point, I have to comb through threads and find the exact page where the thread swerved. I'm not going to do that and it's unreasonable to expect me to.

And as I've said many times, the blame goes both ways. Pro Sanchez and anti-Sanchez. I've never said that pro Sanchez supporters are the only ones doing this.

It's not hyperbolic at best. Milkman brought up the point that anytime anybody did a critique of Cassel, there was always a Sanchez supporter to swerve the thread into a comparison to Sanchez. I don't see why I have to do the research on that when it's completely common sense.

And I don't see why I have to do the research on the idea that Sanchez supporters didn't use every available opportunity to point out on a ton of threads the comparison between Sanchez vs. Cassel when Sanchez was 2-0 and Cassel was 0-1, and Sanchez was 3-0 and Cassel was 0-2.

I don't care if you think it's a cop-out. I think it's a huge waste of time to search for a half hour to argue against a common sense claim. If you honestly believe that any "pro Sanchez" discussion came about because they were baited by an anti-Sanchez person, that's a pretty one-sided accusation.

This description of the situation is spot on. This.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-18-2009, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Sanchez went to a dream situation. Even today, he had 200 yards of run support and still managed to lose the game.

Unheard of. Five picks, ahead most of the game, and 200 yards of run support? Crazy.

He is a rookie, and he will get better.... but if the Chiefs had drafted Sanchez.... they would be 0-6 and Sanchez would look like a bust.

Shame the NFL is locking up the doors for good after the 2009 season.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

This description of the situation is spot on. This.

Except it's predicated upon poor reading comprehension that gets what milkman said 100% incorrect.

10-18-2009, 04:45 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Sanchez? Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 08:30 PM	#409
Coach Champs! Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $3718476	Looks like this thread lost it's burst..... __________________ Super Bowl IV, LIV, LVII & LVIII Champions 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024, & 2025 AFC Champions 1985 & 2015 Major League Baseball World Series Champions 1980, 1985, 2014, & 2015 Major League Baseball American League Champions 2015 American League Central Division Champs
Posts: 54,706

10-18-2009, 08:32 PM	#414
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	Sanchez went to a dream situation. Even today, he had 200 yards of run support and still managed to lose the game. Unheard of. Five picks, ahead most of the game, and 200 yards of run support? Crazy. He is a rookie, and he will get better.... but if the Chiefs had drafted Sanchez.... they would be 0-6 and Sanchez would look like a bust.
Posts: 5,540