Football Sanchez? - Page 30

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 04:45 PM

Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-18-2009, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Because it's ****ing annoying to ask someone to comb through 6 months of threads to comb through the exact page on a 100 page thread to figure out the exact moment Sanchez's name was mentioned in the context of a Sanchez vs. Cassel comparison.

I've said the shit flinging has gone both ways. Do you really believe that the pro Sanchez supporters for 6 months have been baited every single time by the anti Sanchez crowd? I've never even said one's more to blame than the other. I think it's annoying from both sides of the spectrum.

Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-18-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

And history proves that drafting QBs with the amount of experience that Sanchez has never pays off either.

Huge sample size you're working with there.

It's happened, what, once, before Sanchez?

**dirk digler** · 10-18-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray

that's pretty much it...Pioli liked how he waited behind good qb's and then took the reigns when he finally had the chance..dude got hit almost forty times last week..he's a fighter.

what's funny is the immediate success/dailure rate imposed on both qb's..both have just become starting qb's.... both paths will have ups and downs...six games, good or bad, don't tell us squat..most of this fervor is wasted energy.

I agree and I think this whole argument is stupid and a waste of time and bandwidth.

That stat line I heard about Cassel getting hit on like 95% of his passes is just crazy. Not many QB's could handle the punishment that he has received.

ChiefsCountry · 10-18-2009, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Pretty unfair to call a guy a career backup because he backed up the best QB in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers was a career backup until last year too.

WTF, he never played in college either. It is what he is, a career backup until Pollard ****ed up last year.

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Huge sample size you're working with there.

It's happened, what, once, before Sanchez?

Don't be so obtuse.

Surely you can draw the reference to other junior QBs who came out. You are right though, Sanchez did have even less experience than them.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.

There have been several. Otter started one a few weeks ago that I remember specifically.

Marcellus · 10-18-2009, 08:52 PM

[QUOTE=doomy3;6186300

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.[/QUOTE]

This is the big picture.

splatbass · 10-18-2009, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

I don't think he is talking about STARTING threads. He is talking about posts within threads.

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

There have been several. Otter started one a few weeks ago that I remember specifically.

Cool, I haven't been on here much lately, because I am tired of reading the same bullshit in every single thread. I must have missed Otter's thread.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

Cool, I haven't been on here much lately, because I am tired of reading the same bullshit in every single thread. I must have missed Otter's thread.

You're a wiser man than I am, Gunga Din.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad · 10-18-2009, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

This is true for the most part, though I do think there is some Pioli baiting that goes around

tonyetony · 10-18-2009, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Every time? Hell no. I never claimed that.

But more often than not.

I don't recall myself, Hamas, Mecca, Dane, Milkman, etc starting "baiting" threads, but I can't say that about the anti-Sanchez folks.

Funny how you know exactly who the Sanchez lovers are without being asked.

Saccopoo · 10-18-2009, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

While history says that Cassel won't win a Super Bowl for us, I hope to hell he sure proves us wrong. I just think trading for a career backup was the wrong move and history proves it is.

First off, what "history" is this that says that Cassel won't win a Super Bowl or that this "history" proves that trading for a backup was a wrong move? Especially considering that we got a perennial Pro Bowl linebacker along with our starting QB. I'm a little confused as to how you think that this was a wrong move, especially basing it on a "historical" perspective.

Actually, watching our second round pick this year (Cassel and Vrabel), I don't see how the trade was anything but a very good to excellent move at the least. It gave the team the opportunity to be more competitive on both sides of the ball sooner rather than later. As well, while not the most flashy of picks, it looks like the Jackson pick was solid, considering the near night and day difference in the run defense from last season to this one. At the end of last season, it might have been a toss up between which was worse - the O line or the D line.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-18-2009, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

This is actually the first baiting thread about Sanchez that I can remember, other than RoR's usual bullshit.

Has this been happening often?

I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

And one from....you.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...hlight=sanchez

10-18-2009, 04:45 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Sanchez? Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 08:52 PM	#443
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $-477338	[QUOTE=doomy3;6186300 I have seen several posts though about Sanchez in threads about other subjects, some from the people you mentioned.[/QUOTE] This is the big picture.
Posts: 74,400