|
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $6143463
|
Now with how Oregon is piss pounding USC, someone wanna explain to me why Boise St. shouldn't get a shot at a NC?
|
Posts: 15,946
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Casino cash: $-732950
|
|
Posts: 115,382
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $6143463
|
|
Posts: 15,946
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Casino cash: $-732950
|
|
Posts: 115,382
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Champs!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Casino cash: $3708476
|
Quote:
It's true though. Fla or Alabama is going to lose, there's no way of denying that. I still think Iowa may lose one. The question is, will it be against Northwestern or Ohio State? Texas possibly have the best shot here, becuase they have been playing well as of late. They do have to match up against Texas aTm that might be a concern. Other than that, there are 3 undefeated teams left. Cincy, TCU and Boise. It all comes down on who shows the most consistent wins, meaning who can win big and big.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Posts: 54,706
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Rock Chalk!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Casino cash: $7744961
|
|
Posts: 15,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Casino cash: $7231160
|
Because the NCAA cant handle another Boise/OU game... Nothing hurts the NCAA itself than someone spanking or embrassing a traditional power in a bowl game....
Boise is a threat, NCAA will squash that threat some how some way... |
Posts: 1,529
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|