We are not taking a QB in the first round

[RustShack]

The Chiefs line isn't nearly as bad as people are claiming... I can understand thinking that if you quit watching half way through the season but its really not the case anymore... we still NEED a RG and C bad but still..

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by RustShack

The Chiefs line isn't nearly as bad as people are claiming... I can understand thinking that if you quit watching half way through the season but its really not the case anymore... we still NEED a RG and C bad but still..

They're playing somewhat better, but that's not saying a whole lot from where they started. In terms of personnel, I think they're still one of the worst in the league and need a complete overhaul for 2010. I'd say anybody other than Albert should be expendable, and he's only kept as a high draft pick and for future potential.

Basically what I mean is that the goal here shouldn't be to take mediocre players and try to improve them into a collectively below average line, which is what they've done in 2009. The goal should be to get 5 good starting-calibre players and make them into one of the top lines in the league. Dick Vermeil had that part of it right, I think.

How they do that, I don't know. But by no means should the 2010 line even remotely resemble the 2009 one, not if they want to win...anything.

Maybe the same can be said for Cassel. Like I said, I don't know. What I do know is that he's under a pretty serious contract and, much like my mention of Albert, the likelihood is that the job's his, whether you, me, or anybody else likes it or not...