***Official Chiefs Will Beat Denver Thread***

[Hammock Parties]

Oh, I'm on that safety bandwagon. Believe it. I dunno who else to pick, though. I wont be thrilled with a running back. We have a good, potentially Pro Bowl running back. We don't need to be handing another one 40 million.

Too many negatives.

[RustShack]

If we win this game I say Mays or McClain has to be the pick. I also don't see Alexander going in the second round... but that might be because I'm not a Mizzou Fan.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by RustShack

If we win this game I say Mays or McClain has to be the pick. I also don't see Alexander going in the second round... but that might be because I'm not a Mizzou Fan.

Mays?

At 3??

[RustShack]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

Mays?

At 3??

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by RustShack

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

But I think worst case scenario is like at 5. I have never been impressed with mays pass coverage.
Posted via Mobile Device

[RustShack]

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

But I think worst case scenario is like at 5. I have never been impressed with mays pass coverage.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hes not used in coverage the same way as Berry is... but I really think he could cover in the right scheme and I think all of his problems are coachable.. you really should expect rookies to be projects their first few years anyways. Bob Saunders really wasn't a coverage guy either.. but like Mays he could hit and break up passes. The difference is Mays is much bigger, faster, more athletic, and not injury prone. I've heard a lot of Roy Williams comparisions that I really don't see.. but even so Roy Williams was a Pro Bowl Safety every year in this scheme under Parcells. I see Mays as a SS for us which I think would utilize his talents and not waste them like being a FS in a Cover One defense does.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by RustShack

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

My question would be the same regardless of which pick we have, whether it's 3 or 13 or 23. Okay, maybe not 23.

[Easy 6]

Rule#1 - No RB's in the draft.

Rule#2 - See Rule#1.

A Prime Mover is in place already, would it be nice to take an available stud RB? of course, but this team needs growth at a position wide list of players.

RB isnt in the dire need as so many other positions, instead of another back, how about a lineback?

I dont care what anyone says, i just read an article yesterday that talked about how an uncapped year would be far more strict & controlled but many players would be available regardless, just with tighter rules in place. Far fewer, if any, top tier players going elsewhere. But if any position group will be plentiful IMO, it will be RB... there will be plenty of talent around to complement Charles with in free agency with.

Safety, nose, linebacker, guard, center, right tackle, receiver, whatever... anyfrickinthing besides RB.

[-King-]

I just read every post in this thread and there's 1 thing that I can't understands....




Why are these posts in this thread? How the **** did this turn into a draft thread?


FWIW, I think keg is right. As nice as spiller would be, he's a luxury. McClain isn't that big of a reach and unlike spiller, he actually helps a position that's in deep need.

But hopefully berry will still be on the board during our pick....so we can skip over him and draft okung. To the bicycle!!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

[LaChapelle]

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

I just read every post in this thread and there's 1 thing that I can't understands....




Why are these posts in this thread? How the **** did this turn into a draft thread?


FWIW, I think keg is right. As nice as spiller would be, he's a luxury. McClain isn't that big of a reach and unlike spiller, he actually helps a position that's in deep need.

But hopefully berry will still be on the board during our pick....so we can skip over him and draft okung. To the bicycle!!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

The draft is more important than the outcome of this game
Except for GoChiefs, he can't be rational about the Broncos
it's personnal

[keg in kc]

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

[RustShack]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

In the second round I would love Mike Iupati if hes there... hes like the Branden Albert prospect of the right side... put I would much rather just leave him at guard.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

Games are won in the trenches by guys with fire in their bellies.

This is the type of process that will enable us to change the culture and find the right 53.

[alanm]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Games are won in the trenches by guys with fire in their bellies.

This is the type of process that will enable us to change the culture and find the right 53.

You're supposed to feed them chilli and Milk of Magnesia before the games now?

[RustShack]

I don't want Mays for his coverage skills, I want him for his hard hitting and big impact player presence. He has the ability to cover and him getting those skills after a few years in the NFL would be a major bonus. He has the highest ceiling of anyone.