Drafturbators Mock - Page 2

Saccopoo · 02:21 PM

1. Jimmy Clausen, QB; Notre Dame

2. Brandon Graham, DE; Michigan

2. Arrelious Benn, WR; Illinois

3. Morgan Burnett, FS; Georgia Tech

4. Torrell Troup, DT; Central Florida

5. Micah Johnson, ILB; Kentucky

5. LeGarrette Blount, RB; Oregon

5. Chris Scott, OT; Tennessee

Saccopoo · 02-16-2010, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

I'm far from a draftubators fan after they tried to pull the old smoke and mirrors routine with what Sanchez's season was this year, but that's not bad; especially Graham at 2. I would prefer to see Bradford at #1 though.

Drafturbators do not pick Big 12 Spread quarterbacks. Ever. This is the #1 rule of being a drafturbator.

KCrockaholic · 02-16-2010, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tango&Cash

1. S - Eric Berry
2a. OLB - Brandon Graham
2b. ILB - Brandon Spikes
3. NT - Cam Thomas
4. RB - LaGarrett Blount/Montario Hardesty
5. OT - Chris Scott
5. C - Eric Olsen
5. WR - Jacoby Ford
6. QB - Ryan Perriloux

TO THE SHIP!!!

This is a pipe dream.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 02-16-2010, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Drafturbators do not pick Big 12 Spread quarterbacks. Ever. This is the #1 rule of being a drafturbator.

This is what happens when you co-opt the verbiage of a know-nothing ****tard. You become one.

See comments made relative to Gabbert, Blaine. Then, proceed to the Alomar Forest.

Jerm · 02-16-2010, 02:14 PM

We have tons of other needs and more than likely a player for one of those positions will be there yet we're taking Clausen at #5 and paying him huge money when we just gave Cassel a big contract and the current regime is behind him?

*sigh*

Ooooook.
Posted via Mobile Device

Saccopoo · 02-16-2010, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

This is what happens when you co-opt the verbiage of a know-nothing ****tard. You become one.

See comments made relative to Gabbert, Blaine. Then, proceed to the Alomar Forest.

I was waiting for that. I know you like Gabbert. It's so out of character that it's damn near comical.

Brock · 02-16-2010, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm

We have tons of other needs and more than likely a player for one of those positions will be there yet we're taking Clausen at #5 and paying him huge money when we just gave Cassel a big contract and the current regime is behind him?

*sigh*

Ooooook.
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes, by all means, let's compound one mistake with another.

Saccopoo · 02-16-2010, 02:18 PM

By the way, I have a Drafturbators addendum. Darryl Sharpton has been removed from the list and Micah Johnson has been inserted in his place. Both play MLB, but Johnson is substantially larger, and possesses a super human physique. (Something that a true drafturbator demands from at least one of their draft picks.) Sharpton is a redundant pick as we basically have the same guy on our roster in Belcher. My mistake on the correct drafturbator middle linebacker.

Carry on.

Jerm · 02-16-2010, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Yes, by all means, let's compound one mistake with another.

Exactly...if you really want a QB, wait for Locker next year.

Clausen is not the answer, Cassel or no Cassel.
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock · 02-16-2010, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm

Exactly...if you really want a QB, wait for Locker next year.

Clausen is not the answer, Cassel or no Cassel.
Posted via Mobile Device

So, your idea is, count on the unlikely event that this team, as bad as it is, will have the first overall pick?

Jerm · 02-16-2010, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

So, your idea is, count on the unlikely event that this team, as bad as it is, will have the first overall pick?

Ehhhh good point lol.

just was trying to make the point that drafting Clausen would be beyond moronic.
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock · 02-16-2010, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm

Ehhhh good point lol.

just was trying to make the point that drafting Clausen would be beyond moronic.
Posted via Mobile Device

Right. Except it wouldn't be.

Jerm · 02-16-2010, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Right. Except it wouldn't be.

Soooo we have needs on both lines, CB, LB, WR, and Safety yet we're going to pay top 5 money to a QB who has no business being taken that high to sit behind Cassel?

Sorry I just fail to see how that's a "good idea". Like it or not, Haley and Pioli are hitched to Cassel and aren't going to give up on him after one or two seasons.

I can't believe anyone would advocate taking Clausen over Berry, Bryant, or even friggin Okung.
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock · 02-16-2010, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm

Soooo we have needs on both lines, CB, LB, WR, and Safety yet we're going to pay top 5 money to a QB who has no business being taken that high to sit behind Cassel?

Sorry I just fail to see how that's a "good idea". Like it or not, Haley and Pioli are hitched to Cassel and aren't going to give up on him after one or two seasons.

I can't believe anyone would advocate taking Clausen over Berry, Bryant, or even friggin Okung.
Posted via Mobile Device

This is the same shit that's been said 3 years running now. No, not MATT RYAN, HE SUCKS......NOT STAFFORD, NOT SANCHEZ, THEY SUCK.

Jerm · 02-16-2010, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

This is the same shit that's been said 3 years running now. No, not MATT RYAN, HE SUCKS......NOT STAFFORD, NOT SANCHEZ, THEY SUCK.

Well seeing as Matt Ryan nor Stafford weren't there when we picked its kinda hard to compare the situations.

Its not about Clausen being bad or whatever, it just is illogical.
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock · 02-16-2010, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm

Well seeing as Matt Ryan nor Stafford weren't there when we picked its kinda hard to compare the situations.

Its not about Clausen being bad or whatever, it just is illogical.
Posted via Mobile Device

It isn't hard to compare the situations. There are people here every year who shoot down the idea of drafting a QB high, the reasons change, but the faces never do.

And it isn't illogical to nail down the most important position on the field if you have the opportunity to do so, especially when you have a stiff at the position, no matter how much money he's making.

02-16-2010, 01:02 AM
Saccopoo Kindness in words... Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Zion Casino cash: $10025483	Drafturbators Mock 1. Jimmy Clausen, QB; Notre Dame 2. Brandon Graham, DE; Michigan 2. Arrelious Benn, WR; Illinois 3. Morgan Burnett, FS; Georgia Tech 4. Torrell Troup, DT; Central Florida 5. Micah Johnson, ILB; Kentucky 5. LeGarrette Blount, RB; Oregon 5. Chris Scott, OT; Tennessee Last edited by Saccopoo; 02-16-2010 at 02:21 PM..
Posts: 15,450

02-16-2010, 02:14 PM	#19
Jerm Mahomes > God Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $4378996	We have tons of other needs and more than likely a player for one of those positions will be there yet we're taking Clausen at #5 and paying him huge money when we just gave Cassel a big contract and the current regime is behind him? sigh Ooooook. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 10,225

02-16-2010, 02:18 PM	#22
Saccopoo Kindness in words... Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Zion Casino cash: $10025483	By the way, I have a Drafturbators addendum. Darryl Sharpton has been removed from the list and Micah Johnson has been inserted in his place. Both play MLB, but Johnson is substantially larger, and possesses a super human physique. (Something that a true drafturbator demands from at least one of their draft picks.) Sharpton is a redundant pick as we basically have the same guy on our roster in Belcher. My mistake on the correct drafturbator middle linebacker. Carry on.
Posts: 15,450