Fargas will visit Chiefs

[Micjones]

Originally Posted by billay

You are making comparisons based on one year LOL.

Yes, genius...the most recent one.
And in that one... Chambers outplayed the younger WR.

You also have no sense in ecomonics either. I'm not going to buy a microwave that only works for 2 years when I can buy basically the same product that will last longer.

Walter isn't going to be a 5 year solution.
I don't know why you suggested that.
I would much rather re-sign Chambers as a #2 who can stretch the field (something that he's better at than Walter) and DRAFT his replacement.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by Micjones

Yes, genius...the most recent one.
And in that one... Chambers outplayed the younger WR.



Walter isn't going to be a 5 year solution.
I don't know why you suggested that.
I would much rather re-sign Chambers as a #2 who can stretch the field (something that he's better at than Walter) and DRAFT his replacement.

It's painfully obvious you don't watch the games.

What about the 2 years before where Walters outplayed Chambers?

Care to explain why Walter isn't a 5 year option other than it's made up and makes your argument look better?

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by billay

It's painfully obvious you don't watch the games.

What about the 2 years before where Walters outplayed Chambers?

Care to explain why Walter isn't a 5 year option other than it's made up and makes your argument look better?

Because he'll be 29 years old in August.

You really want this team to be going into the playoffs 5 years from now with a 34 year old receiver who was never a superstar even in his peak years?

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Because he'll be 29 years old in August.

You really want this team to be going into the playoffs 5 years from now with a 34 year old receiver who was never a superstar even in his peak years?

You're assuming he'd still be a WR2 at that point.

Then again, considering Pioli's drafting ability, you might be right.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Micjones

Yes, genius...the most recent one.
And in that one... Chambers outplayed the younger WR.



Walter isn't going to be a 5 year solution.
I don't know why you suggested that.
I would much rather re-sign Chambers as a #2 who can stretch the field (something that he's better at than Walter) and DRAFT his replacement.

Wow, hypocritical much?

Walter, who's 28 years old, can't play until he's 33.

Yet the guy you're pimping, who's 31, has at least two years left in the tank.

Interesting.

[Micjones]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Wow, hypocritical much?

Walter, who's 28 years old, can't play until he's 33.

Yet the guy you're pimping, who's 31, has at least two years left in the tank.

Interesting.

Hold on... I NEVER said he could play two more years.
I suggested he's a one year stop-gap and you DRAFT his replacement.
I wouldn't depend on him producing for two more years.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Wow, hypocritical much?

Walter, who's 28 years old, can't play until he's 33.

Yet the guy you're pimping, who's 31, has at least two years left in the tank.

Interesting.

The difference being that the next two years, we know we're not going to be perfect at every position. In 5 years, if either of these guys is our receiver, then we ****ed up big time.

Both of these guys are good options 2 years down the road when we're not competing for anything. It's unacceptable if either of these guys, at their age, are a major receiving option 4-5 years down the road.