|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
So, let me guess, you're happy with this draft.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1865503
|
That depends on what we see on the field. I'm not stoked about the later picks. I don't know how to feel about Arenas--I would have liked to have seen a different pick. I like the McCluster pick if he is who we think he is. While I wouldn't have drafted Arenas, I don't think it's the "shit the pants" pick people say it is if he is an effective nickel back and return guy. Asamoah--not ecstatic nor upset about the pick. Moeaki, I'm not a big fan of trading up for the pick, but given Weis' preference for double-TE sets, I trust his judgment on this one.
I just don't get grades of F for the draft. I think right now it grades as a C+ and, if McCluster becomes Sproles, Moeaki is an effective 2-TE set starter, Asamoah a starter on the interior, and Arenas is a nickel back/return guy, I think it could easily be upgraded to a B+. I just don't understand why everyone insists that we needed to pigeonhole our picks to two positions, rather than take the guy we thought was BPA. And I think we'll find that a lot of the guys we were pimping are going to be very average pros, so I don't understand why some are pimping them out to be anything more than just ordinary picks. |
Posts: 51,699
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|