Football Dumervil injured. - Page 17

-King- · 08-04-2010, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Here’s a scary sentence, Broncos fans: Star pass rusher Elvis Dumervil left Wednesday’s practice early with an apparent arm or shoulder injury.

Head trainer Steve Antonopulos accompanied Dumervil to the locker room. Dumervil was holding his right arm tight against his chest, with his hand grasping the neck area of his jersey.

Dumervil and the Broncos pass rushers were participating in a one-on-one pass rush drill against offensive linemen when Dumervil was injured.

Wheres Tebow with the holy water?

Hootie · 08-05-2010, 04:28 PM

Lets put it this way...

Rivers is elite...

Campbell/Cassel/Orton/Quinn/Croyle/Tebow/etc...

are all mediocre at best with upside minimal at best (most likely)...maybe one or two of those guys will surprise...

but I think it's pretty funny about Denver fans...

That team is a train wreck...absolute mess...I feel as if they could legitimately win 1 game next year...wouldn't surprise me.

They are TRULY bad.

Hootie · 08-05-2010, 04:29 PM

I'll never forget the draft this season when the Chiefs took Berry (awesome!) and then I watched and watched and watched and then Denver took Tebow.

That was the best day 1 I've ever witnessed...it was amazing and a great experience for a Chiefs fan.

veist · 08-05-2010, 04:30 PM

Denver's roster without Dumervil, is like a 4-win ±2 roster.

vailpass · 08-05-2010, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

Excuse me if I don't envy Lloyd/Stokely/Gaffney...

Shit...even Royal is 'blah'...but I'll give him some credit for at least having upside.

The other three are ****ing camp fodder on most every other NFL team...yet somehow you have KnowMo pimping those guys like they are "studs"...

Hahahaha...

God damn they make D-Bowe and Chambers look like top tier starting caliber receivers...

I'd take McCluster over any of those four any day without thinking twice (same with Bowe, obviously)...

I'd say Chambers and Royal is a push, though...so you got that going for you...

I mean...

Offensively...(this is sad for you guys, by the way)...

Offensively...the Chiefs are SO MUCH MORE TALENTED than Denver it isn't even funny...so that's just hilarious.

You think McCluster is a WR? Little dude will get broke in half if they are ever dumb enough to run him like that.
My point wasn't that Denver's WR are stud. My point was that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
And that last line about KC being offensively talented?
Dude, c'mon now.

**chefsos** · 08-05-2010, 04:32 PM

Yes, if you add up all the yardage gained by every person on the field who catches a football thrown by Orton, you might just arrive at the total of 4000.

Mr. Arrowhead · 08-05-2010, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

You think McCluster is a WR? Little dude will get broke in half if they are ever dumb enough to run him like that.
My point wasn't that Denver's WR are stud. My point was that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
And that last line about KC being offensively talented?
Dude, c'mon now.

yes dexter is WR, look at the roster man

RedThat · 08-05-2010, 04:35 PM

I really like Oaklands defense.

Hey when you have Richard Seymour, John Henderson, Thomas Howard, Kameron Wimbley, Nnamdi Asomugha..Thats handful of guys that could elevate the play of a defense and make the guys around them better.

Yeah they have a few question marks...i.e., Michael Huff needs to step up his game, although at this point in his career I think he is what he is. Campbell is not the answer, but he is definately better than what they previously had. McFadden needs to breakout. If McClain can be the real deal they may be onto something.

**The Franchise** · 08-05-2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

You think McCluster is a WR? Little dude will get broke in half if they are ever dumb enough to run him like that.
My point wasn't that Denver's WR are stud. My point was that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
And that last line about KC being offensively talented?
Dude, c'mon now.

Really dude.....come on now.

QB - It's a wash. I wouldn't really want Cassel OR Orton leading my team.
RB - Chiefs
WRs - Chiefs
TEs - Wash for right now.

**Buck** · 08-05-2010, 04:36 PM

Here's how I rank the starting QBs in the AFC West.

1. Rivers
2. Cassel
3. Campbell
4. Orton

Running backs
1. Charles
2. Thomas Jones
3. Sproles
4. Moreno, Mathews, McFadden

Wide Receivers
1. Vincent Jackson
2. Dwayne Bowe
3. Malcom Floyd
4. Louis Murphy
5. Legedu Naanee
6. Eddie Royal
7. Chris Chambers
8. Brandon Stokley

Tight Ends
1. Gates
2. Miller
3. Graham
4. ????

Consistent1 · 08-05-2010, 04:37 PM

I don't believe there is much chance of anyone getting past SD. Looks like wishful thinking for all the other three. I do think that Oakland comes in second. Then a toss-up between us and Denver as to who clicks as a team more as the season progresses. Denver having the injury bug hit early doesn't make them look real promising right now. I would just guess SD, Oak, KC, Denver. I don't even feel at all comfortable with that order, because I am thinking something surprising happens with one of the bottom three, but not nearly enough to get past Rivers and Co.

CoMoChief · 08-05-2010, 04:37 PM

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

**** Denver....

Seriously, **** em.....hard........in the ass.

vailpass · 08-05-2010, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Really dude.....come on now.

QB - It's a wash. I wouldn't really want Cassel OR Orton leading my team.
RB - Chiefs
WRs - Chiefs
TEs - Wash for right now.

WRs-Denver
OL-Denver
RB-KC
TE-I honestly don't know
QB-We'll see

vailpass · 08-05-2010, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead

yes dexter is WR, look at the roster man

The little dude is going to play at WR? You sure about that?

Fish · 08-05-2010, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly

if campbell plays like he can they will make a run imo.

I agree. I think it's possible for Campbell to lead that offense to respectability this year.. He's got the talent. I don't think he ever fit in WAS. If it was WAS that was really the problem with Campbell, then he could do well with a change of scenery... Even going to the black shithole...

I'd take him over Cassel.......

**Buck** · 08-05-2010, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

The little dude is going to play at WR? You sure about that?

Yeah, like a slot receiver a la Wes Welker....the Chiefs are hoping he turns out just as good.

08-05-2010, 04:28 PM	#241
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Lets put it this way... Rivers is elite... Campbell/Cassel/Orton/Quinn/Croyle/Tebow/etc... are all mediocre at best with upside minimal at best (most likely)...maybe one or two of those guys will surprise... but I think it's pretty funny about Denver fans... That team is a train wreck...absolute mess...I feel as if they could legitimately win 1 game next year...wouldn't surprise me. They are TRULY bad.
Posts: 56,356

08-05-2010, 04:29 PM	#242
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I'll never forget the draft this season when the Chiefs took Berry (awesome!) and then I watched and watched and watched and then Denver took Tebow. That was the best day 1 I've ever witnessed...it was amazing and a great experience for a Chiefs fan.
Posts: 56,356

08-05-2010, 04:30 PM	#243
veist Veteran Join Date: Oct 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	Denver's roster without Dumervil, is like a 4-win ±2 roster.
Posts: 1,324

08-05-2010, 04:32 PM	#245
chefsos Fifty eight sixty two... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Felton, DE Casino cash: $8247676	Yes, if you add up all the yardage gained by every person on the field who catches a football thrown by Orton, you might just arrive at the total of 4000.
Posts: 9,451

08-05-2010, 04:35 PM	#247
RedThat Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Earth Casino cash: $10004900	I really like Oaklands defense. Hey when you have Richard Seymour, John Henderson, Thomas Howard, Kameron Wimbley, Nnamdi Asomugha..Thats handful of guys that could elevate the play of a defense and make the guys around them better. Yeah they have a few question marks...i.e., Michael Huff needs to step up his game, although at this point in his career I think he is what he is. Campbell is not the answer, but he is definately better than what they previously had. McFadden needs to breakout. If McClain can be the real deal they may be onto something.
Posts: 6,666

08-05-2010, 04:36 PM	#249
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $5940295	Here's how I rank the starting QBs in the AFC West. 1. Rivers 2. Cassel 3. Campbell 4. Orton Running backs 1. Charles 2. Thomas Jones 3. Sproles 4. Moreno, Mathews, McFadden Wide Receivers 1. Vincent Jackson 2. Dwayne Bowe 3. Malcom Floyd 4. Louis Murphy 5. Legedu Naanee 6. Eddie Royal 7. Chris Chambers 8. Brandon Stokley Tight Ends 1. Gates 2. Miller 3. Graham 4. ????
Posts: 44,607

08-05-2010, 04:37 PM	#250
Consistent1 _____________ Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $10004900	I don't believe there is much chance of anyone getting past SD. Looks like wishful thinking for all the other three. I do think that Oakland comes in second. Then a toss-up between us and Denver as to who clicks as a team more as the season progresses. Denver having the injury bug hit early doesn't make them look real promising right now. I would just guess SD, Oak, KC, Denver. I don't even feel at all comfortable with that order, because I am thinking something surprising happens with one of the bottom three, but not nearly enough to get past Rivers and Co.
Posts: 3,096

08-05-2010, 04:37 PM	#251
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7672254	BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!! ** Denver.... Seriously, ** em.....hard........in the ass.
Posts: 39,245