TJ was better than Charles in Cleveland.

[CrazyHorse]

So you guys would rather have Jones over Charles?

Yeah......me either. Given 20 carries a game would solve all these debates. Jones had 5 mediocre carries in one game and everyone forgets the half season Charles put together.

Charles did nothing to lose his starting job to Jones. Now were back to rbbc. Yee ****ing haw

[sedated]

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

So you guys would rather have Jones over Charles?

Yeah......me either. Given 20 carries a game would solve all these debates. Jones had 5 mediocre carries in one game and everyone forgets the half season Charles put together.

Charles did nothing to lose his starting job to Jones. Now were back to rbbc. Yee ****ing haw

that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

[Hog's Gone Fishin]

Originally Posted by sedated

that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

I think the coaching staff has the plan. and yes , lets use Charles as needed.

[CrazyHorse]

Originally Posted by sedated

that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

Originally Posted by sedated

that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

False choice? That was dumb. The thread is about one being better than the other so I ask which one would you want

Why does it have to be 400 carries?


If we were 0-2 there would be no debate. Everyone would want our best back getting the carries. Offense is not winning games for us. When it starts losing games I think we will allll be on the same page.

[SenselessChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

So you guys would rather have Jones over Charles?

Yeah......me either. Given 20 carries a game would solve all these debates. Jones had 5 mediocre carries in one game and everyone forgets the half season Charles put together.

Charles did nothing to lose his starting job to Jones. Now were back to rbbc. Yee ****ing haw

If I could only have one for an entire season, yes, I would rather have Jones. Jones is more durable, and the better all around back.

And, when we have to grind out a first down, I want Jones in there, not Charles. Hey, Charles needs to get on the field, but when we MUST get positive yards, Jones is the guy.

I didn't forget the half season that Charles put together. I also didn't forget that he spent the offseason rehabbing from an injury.

TJ is the better all around back. Charles is the more exciting and electrifying player, but that doesn't equal better.