If not Luck...

[BillSelfsTrophycase]

Originally Posted by Bump

at this point, I'd trade a 2nd or 3rd for Chase ****ing Daniels and i hate Chase ****ing Daniels

I hate Cassel as much as the next guy, but Chase Daniel?

[jlscorpio]

my thread has now officially been rendered null, since we will be taking Luck w/the #1 overall pick.

[oaklandhater]

Originally Posted by Bump

at this point, I'd trade a 2nd or 3rd for Chase ****ing Daniels and i hate Chase ****ing Daniels

[ToxSocks]

Who are we going to beat, really? We'll win maybe 2-3 games. We should start looking at Luck.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Who are we going to beat, really? We'll win maybe 2-3 games. We should start looking at Luck.

We will have that "feel good win" and **** everything up by beating the Colts. We're going to get beat in any tie breaker situation, so the Chiefs have to be clearly the worst team in the NFL to get Luck.

They are going to **** this up.

[oaklandhater]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

We will have that "feel good win" and **** everything up by beating the Colts. We're going to get beat in any tie breaker situation, so the Chiefs have to be clearly the worst team in the NFL to get Luck.

They are going to **** this up.

We did

[alnorth]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Who are we going to beat, really? We'll win maybe 2-3 games. We should start looking at Luck.

There's a huge difference between 2 or 3 wins. We will probably lose every tiebreaker, we have to be the clear-cut crappiest team in the NFL, no ties.

It can be done with 3 wins, but there's many years with more than one 3-win team. We need to be 1-15 or 2-14 to be relatively safe.

[mdchiefsfan]

Originally Posted by alnorth

There's a huge difference between 2 or 3 wins. We will probably lose every tiebreaker, we have to be the clear-cut crappiest team in the NFL, no ties.

It can be done with 3 wins, but there's many years with more than one 3-win team. We need to be 1-15 or 2-14 to be relatively safe.

So far, mission accomplished!

[Hammock Parties]

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

I don't know. The vibe from this game, from Cassel's look on the sideline, to the tone Haley said some things in his presser with, I am thinking there might be a chance. I was a believer we wouldn't this year, but I got some hope today. Didn't hurt that Palko threw the worst throw of all time towards the sideline.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel.

I might just quit watching football altogether until Pioli is fired if that happened.

No way I subject myself to that rape

[oaklandhater]

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel.

It's like we are reliving the past

[Barret]

My question is this, Why is both Stanzi and Powe inactive?? Last yer we had almost all the rookies in the games and playing. I understand you can't have Stanzi in when you are still tied to Cassel but if you are getting blown out, why not get them adjusted to the NFL speed?

[mdchiefsfan]

Originally Posted by Barret

My question is this, Why is both Stanzi and Powe inactive?? Last yer we had almost all the rookies in the games and playing. I understand you can't have Stanzi in when you are still tied to Cassel but if you are getting blown out, why not get them adjusted to the NFL speed?

My thoughts exactly.

[alnorth]

If not Luck, then best QB available.

Unless Cassel shows a jaw-dropping leap in improvement over the rest of the season, against good teams, it is clear we need to accept that the guaranteed portion of his contract is a sunk cost and move on.