So, Ricky Stanzi sucks...

[RealSNR]

Josh Looney said something unbelievably tardtastic in this article. The scary thing is he's one of the best sources of Chiefs news, so he may only be the messenger:

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...b-b7abf887f19c

For now, there is no debate whether or not Stanzi should be the starting quarterback. That job belongs to Palko.

Palko earned the job in training camp and climbed an often times conscienceless mountain of practice squads and pink slips to gain this opportunity. Throwing Stanzi to the wolves in a Monday night road game would be conscienceless as well.

“I think Ricky is doing a terrific job, he’s getting better, he’s making progress,” Haley said. “But I think Tyler is clearly the next in line.”

He seems to almost be saying that Palko has the backup job because it's his turn. He uses the word "conscienceless"

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by SNR

Josh Looney said something unbelievably tardtastic in this article. The scary thing is he's one of the best sources of Chiefs news, so he may only be the messenger:

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...b-b7abf887f19c



He seems to almost be saying that Palko has the backup job because it's his turn. He uses the word "conscienceless"

Thats what I thought when I read that earlier, too.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by SNR

Josh Looney said something unbelievably tardtastic in this article. The scary thing is he's one of the best sources of Chiefs news, so he may only be the messenger:

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...b-b7abf887f19c



He seems to almost be saying that Palko has the backup job because it's his turn. He uses the word "conscienceless"

I think what he is trying to say is Palko has worked to earn it and throwing Stanzi to the wolves would be dumb as shit at this point. He hasn't put in the work yet.

That's what I get from it. It may be wrong but the logic isn't completely flawed.