12/13/11 updated draft chart

[Chiefnj2]

KC still sitting outside of the top 10

1 Indianapolis 0-13 .548
2 Minnesota 2-11 .567
3 St. Louis 2-11 .582
4 Washington 4-9 .457
5/6F Jacksonville 4-9 .505
5/6F Carolina 4-9 .505
7 Miami 4-9 .524
8 Cleveland 4-9 .529
9 Tampa Bay 4-9 .538
10 Philadelphia 5-8 .490
11 Buffalo 5-8 .514
12 Kansas City 5-8 .524

[YayMike]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Philly will stick with Vick for 1 more year. Buffalo just gave Fitz 50 some odd million dollars. They aren't grabbing a QB. Cleveland is sitting nice because they have 2 first round picks to use.

I am not so sure about Philly, i think they have had enough of Vick. Good call of Buffalo, i forgot they extended him. Thanks.

Cleveland will definitely move up in my opinion, and i think that crushes our chances. They will get the 3rd qb that is left

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by YayMike

I am not so sure about Philly, i think they have had enough of Vick. Good call of Buffalo, i forgot they extended him. Thanks.

Cleveland will definitely move up in my opinion, and i think that crushes our chances. They will get the 3rd qb that is left

Peter King wrote yesterday that he thinks Cleveland should stick with McCoy 1 more year because the surrounding talent is worse than he is. I'm not sure I agree with him, but I guess there is a chance they don't go QB.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by scho63

Here's a site that has the mock draft with order

http://www.footballdraftnotebook.com/MockDraft2012.html

http://www.footballdraftnotebook.com/Draft%20Order.html

Really? An ILB? No way, man.

[Mr. Arrowhead]

teams we need to get a ahead for sure and thats Miami and Washington

[scho63]

Originally Posted by Lzen

Really? An ILB? No way, man.

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with them-just info

I think a RT is our biggest need outside QB if we can't trade or find one in FA

[YayMike]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Peter King wrote yesterday that he thinks Cleveland should stick with McCoy 1 more year because the surrounding talent is worse than he is. I'm not sure I agree with him, but I guess there is a chance they don't go QB.

That would be great for us, but i dont see it happening. I hope that one of the three falls to Carolina, that is the place to trade up.

[KC_Lee]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Peter King wrote yesterday that he thinks Cleveland should stick with McCoy 1 more year because the surrounding talent is worse than he is. I'm not sure I agree with him, but I guess there is a chance they don't go QB.

I don't recall is Hollmgren took McCoy or if that was the previous GM. If Hollmgren did take him he might want to give the kid another chance. That would work in our favor.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead

teams we need to get a ahead for sure and thats Miami and Washington

KC:
GB
Oak
@Den

Mia:
@Buf
@NE
NYJ

Wash:
@NYG
Minn
@Phi

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by scho63

I think a RT is our biggest need outside QB if we can't trade or find one in FA

That's great. You can grab one in rounds 2-4.

[BossChief]

Landry Blackledge is already looking for houses in Olathe.

[Nightfyre]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

That's great. You can grab one in rounds 2-4.

This, especially in this year's draft.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by KC_Lee

I don't recall is Hollmgren took McCoy or if that was the previous GM. If Hollmgren did take him he might want to give the kid another chance. That would work in our favor.

Holmgren took him, but has been pretty neutral about him in comments to the press about whether he's the QBOTF.

[BigCatDaddy]

Originally Posted by YayMike

1 Indianapolis 0-13 .548 -- No doubt. (1)
2 Minnesota 2-11 .567 -- Unlikely.
3 St. Louis 2-11 .582 -- Unlikely.
4 Washington 4-9 .457 --- No doubt. (2)
5/6F Jacksonville 4-9 .505 --- Maybe (3?)
5/6F Carolina 4-9 .505 --- No
7 Miami 4-9 .524 --- Yep but who to take (4)
8 Cleveland 4-9 .529 -- Yep but who to take (5)
9 Tampa Bay 4-9 .538 -- Unlikely
10 Philadelphia 5-8 .490 -- Yep but who to take (6)
11 Buffalo 5-8 .514 -- Yep but who to take (7)
12 Kansas City 5-8 .524

Problem is i think there are only 3 QBs worth taking in the first round so we'd have to get to where Jax is....and convince them that Gabbard is their future so we can have ours.

I think that is a tall task.

The only teams on that list taking a QB are Indi, Miami, and Washington so we have to get ahead of Washington or Miami by either sucking or by trade.

[Shag]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

KC:
GB
Oak
@Den

Mia:
@Buf
@NE
NYJ

Wash:
@NYG
Minn
@Phi

Not likely to get in front of Miami. Some chance for the 'skins, but even that's iffy.

**** you, Phyllis and Palko...

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by eazyb81

Is there any chance our strength of schedule changes enough by the end of the year to win a tiebreaker with anyone in the draft?

Probably a question for CD Cox.

No. This is the strength of schedule that is based on all 16 games/teams on our schedule. The ones that only take into account the teams we have played through the first 13 games will change a lot considering 0-13 Colts are figured in, but the 13-0 Packers are not yet in our strength of schedule. Hope this makes sense.