|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2003
Casino cash: $1166206
|
Quote:
From the tweet, it sounds like the sample was with the person responsible for shipping it, as opposed to being left at the testing facility. Sounds like the collector left work on Friday, took the sample with him, and was too lazy/thought FedEx was closed, so he just took it home with him. If the sample has been in a secure location that entire time, I bet Braun would have lost the appeal. Colossal screw-up. Sounds like MLB needs a new testing company to perform these tests. |
|
Posts: 10,338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1512783
|
Quote:
Jeff Passan @JeffPassan Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open USADA CEO Travis Tygart says it's commonplace for collectors to keep samples refrigerated when taken late at night and on holidays, weekends Jeff Passan @JeffPassan Reply Retweet Favorite · Open Tygart: "This stuff happens around the world all the time. They're collected at people's homes after the UPS or FedEx or DHL is closed." The collector may have not known MLB's procedure and simply just done what they usually do with other tests. |
|
Posts: 58,029
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2003
Casino cash: $1166206
|
Quote:
And who collects samples at people's homes? Most employers who require such screenings make the candidate go into the facility to obtain the sample. Collecting a sample at someone's home as opposed to a sterile, professional facility seems a bit odd to me. |
|
Posts: 10,338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1512783
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 58,029
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|