|
|
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the way that Pioli is performing his job as the GM of the Chiefs? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
78 | 46.99% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
88 | 53.01% |
Voters: 166. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#91 | |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $-1014116
|
Quote:
This team is ****ed for 3 years, at the very least. |
|
Posts: 88,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
I BRAUGHT THE BOOZE
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: KU VILLE
Casino cash: $10007253
|
NO. If you still have Cassel as your starter with Brady Q backing him up you're failing
|
Posts: 2,895
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Casino cash: $1485783
|
We need a QB but you can't discount the improvement in the roster the past few years. We're slowly building a pretty strong team. Also, I'm pretty sure Pioli knows Cassel isn't getting it done and this is his put up or shut up year. If he doesn't perform and Pioli sticks with him again, I'm done with him.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 5,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1805503
|
Quote:
Let's be real here. The Chiefs seem to think that the only thing that would take the job away from Matt Cassel is a player as good as Peyton Manning. |
|
Posts: 51,678
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1805503
|
Quote:
Scott Pioli is building the New England Patriots and he's doing it admirably. Somewhere, he became convinced that the Patriots could be the Patriots without Brady or Bellichick. |
|
Posts: 51,678
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: American Gardens Building
Casino cash: $2688654
|
A++ all the way.
There's really nothing that he could've done better. |
Posts: 17,400
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1454257
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
Posts: 65,481
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
El Diablo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Casino cash: $1616679
|
|
Posts: 6,108
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Iowa B1G West Champs
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Casino cash: $9160151
|
Wished he woulda waited to see how the Alex Smith issue goes down and not be so trigger happy on Brady Quitter. BUT I do like that he saw the holes at the RB spot and OT spot and filled them with quality/elite players. I'm gonna say he is going on the right track. But what I don't understand is having 3 qbs when we only activate 2 a game two of them are below average and one who hasn't gotten a chance to play yet. I do have to say that I am excited(bad or good) to see how Matt Cassel/Stanzi/Quinn play and I do hope all them, depening who starts, plays very well.
|
Posts: 3,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1805503
|
Quote:
In a year where they had tons of cap space, they chose to go cheap on an inferior, older CB. Stanford Routt has probably 3 years left in his legs. Routt will be 29 in July. Carr will be 26 in May. And Carr didn't even break the bank. He was paid a reasonable contract. And the fact that the Chiefs whiffed on the Peyton Manning sweepstakes despite being interested, yes, that's a very big problem. They completely whiffed on Paul Solilai. So we STILL don't have a Nose Tackle. I can't believe how much excitement there is over the Chiefs upgrading with a backup RB and a Right Tackle. Those are two definite Super Bowl positions for sure. The Chiefs get a C purely on the QB situation. They get a D when you factor everything else. |
|
Posts: 51,678
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 |
Hey Loochy, I'm hooome!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PooPooKaKaPeePeeShire
Casino cash: $-1789603
|
Why isn't there a "kinda" vote?
I'm mostly good with him except for the giant WTF situation that is QB. I also hate his stupid secret CIA dumbassery and I think he was the instigator in the Haley situation.
__________________
Hey Loochy, I'm hoooome! ![]() |
Posts: 42,191
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 | |
PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: American Gardens Building
Casino cash: $2688654
|
Quote:
Youre a troll. GTFO |
|
Posts: 17,400
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 |
PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: American Gardens Building
Casino cash: $2688654
|
Carr getting 10 million as opposed to Routt getting 6? I guarantee Routt will put up better numbers than Carr. Manning is a bust. Solilai resigned with his own team and to be honest hes pretty overrated. Wipe out the sand
|
Posts: 17,400
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Casino cash: $10005765
|
I don't know how anyone can say Pioli/Hunt are not doing a good job. They have steadily made this team better, with the exception of the first draft which was not very good. But you have to give them a pass because they got a very late start.
1. Drafts have been good (not great). 2. FA have been very, very good. Quality players without way over paying and killing the cap sitaution. 3. Coaches, an error was made with Haley, but again it was a late start to the process. And they did not hang on for 3,4,5 years hoping things got better. They recognized Haley did not have the right personality and moved on. They have not been shy about bringing in quality coaches and I think Romeo was the right guy for the job given the situaiton. 4. By far the biggest critisim is the QB situation. Assuming they do not give Cassel a free pass this season, I don't see how you can really complain about it either. Name one QB they have passed on in the draft you can say was a huge error; 2009 Shanchez looks to be nothing more than an average QB at best; 2010 everyone was begging for Clasen which turned out to be a very good pass on the Chiefs part. There is not any QB you can look at today and say they should have taken. Stafford and Bradford where #1 picks the Chiefs were never going be able to trade up for. What about FA? Again I don't see a single FA QB you can point to and say the Chiefs should have went and got. The fact is franchise QB are very, very hard to find. Reaching for one you don't think is going to be that kind of guy (and history says he won't) only sets back the franchise. You are much better off building a great roster and then finding the diamond in the rough.....a Big Ben or Tom Brady. Pioli may be arrogant just like King Carl, but he knows how to build a football team. And for all of the complaints about Clark being a tight ass I totally disagree. Yes, he probably does look for value in contracts, but I don't think that is a bad thing. You must manage the cap in the NFL or you just waste your draft picks when you have to let them walk away. Clark has spent money on some big name coaches and he is spending some on some great FA. All of you critics need to come forward and confess you were wrong. Give a little love for the roster Pioli/Hunt are building, and most of all quit the complaining about absolutely every thing that happens. |
Posts: 718
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $2033447
|
Drafts have been very good? Not great?
Pioli has been a Top 5 drafter since arriving in Kansas City. And that's including the 2009 draft. |
Posts: 59,693
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|