Chiefs Would you consider the offseason FA period a success for the Chiefs?

chiefzilla1501 · 03-18-2012, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

You are getting your panties in a bunch over Kyle Ortan.

He's a medicre QB that isn't going to take you to a SB.

Who gives a rat's ass if he gives you slightly better opportunity to possibly win a playoff game if he doesn't give you any better opportunity to win a SB?

Get a ****ing grip.

Because in Orton, you get a few things. #1 - the assurance that the Chiefs are no longer married to Cassel. #2 - in future years, you get a cheap backup. Do you realize that beyond 2012, Orton's contract is $1-2M? That's chump change. #3 - better QB play. #4 - Yes, I do believe Orton can win us a playoff game, even if we can't make the Super Bowl. And this organization badly, badly needs to get that chip off their shoulder.

Matt Cassel has to be cut. His contract is reasonable this year, but there is no ****ing way he should be paid $9M in 2013. All we're doing right now is providing superior weapons for Cassel to look good to the Chiefs, when in fact it's the supporting cast that's going to win games for him.

Add in the fact that with Routt, we have a ton of cap space and we chose to go with a inferior 29 year old over a 26 year old. And it's not like we saved a ton of money either.

L.A. Chieffan · 03-18-2012, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Because in Orton, you get a few things. #1 - the assurance that the Chiefs are no longer married to Cassel. #2 - in future years, you get a cheap backup. Do you realize that beyond 2012, Orton's contract is $1-2M? That's chump change. #3 - better QB play. #4 - Yes, I do believe Orton can win us a playoff game, even if we can't make the Super Bowl. And this organization badly, badly needs to get that chip off their shoulder.

Matt Cassel has to be cut. His contract is reasonable this year, but there is no ****ing way he should be paid $9M in 2013. All we're doing right now is providing superior weapons for Cassel to look good to the Chiefs, when in fact it's the supporting cast that's going to win games for him.

Add in the fact that with Routt, we have a ton of cap space and we chose to go with a inferior 29 year old over a 26 year old. And it's not like we saved a ton of money either.

How is Carr better than Routt besides being younger? Carr is about to get owned.

Orton is just another guy.

milkman · 03-18-2012, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Because in Orton, you get a few things. #1 - the assurance that the Chiefs are no longer married to Cassel. #2 - in future years, you get a cheap backup. Do you realize that beyond 2012, Orton's contract is $1-2M? That's chump change. #3 - better QB play. #4 - Yes, I do believe Orton can win us a playoff game, even if we can't make the Super Bowl. And this organization badly, badly needs to get that chip off their shoulder.

Matt Cassel has to be cut. His contract is reasonable this year, but there is no ****ing way he should be paid $9M in 2013. All we're doing right now is providing superior weapons for Cassel to look good to the Chiefs, when in fact it's the supporting cast that's going to win games for him.

Add in the fact that with Routt, we have a ton of cap space and we chose to go with a inferior 29 year old over a 26 year old. And it's not like we saved a ton of money either.

We saved 4 mil a year.

That's not chump change.

And the miniscule chance that Ortan could lead this team to a playoff win isn't worth the crying that you're doing.

TheGuardian · 03-18-2012, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets low

JFC

How many drives were totally ****ed last year from Richardson?

If signing "premiere" free agents were the key to winning then the Redskins would have won multiple super bowls by now.

Please remove your head from your ass.

milkman · 03-18-2012, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets low

Bottom line in your thought process.

Let's replace shit with shit.

How is that a winning formula?

chiefzilla1501 · 03-18-2012, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

We saved 4 mil a year.

That's not chump change.

And the miniscule chance that Ortan could lead this team to a playoff win isn't worth the crying that you're doing.

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets build around support players while doing nothing to build the core. These players are good but we upgrades only in positions we could have easily upgraded in the second or third round of the draft.

L.A. Chieffan · 03-18-2012, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets build around support players while doing nothing to build the core. These players are good but we upgrades only in positions we could have easily upgraded in the second or third round of the draft.

i see youre avoiding my question about carr vs routt