Home Discord Chat
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > Nzoner's Game Room
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-17-2012, 02:42 PM   #11
keg in kc keg in kc is offline
oxymoron
 
keg in kc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanBusby View Post
I don't like that train of thought. A deeper QB class will just equate to more QB's going early than people would like to consider "ideal" and the Chiefs will be in the same ****ing situation except there will be more QB's that will go before the Chiefs pick.
It's a fair point, but I look at it this way: I think last year was a relatively deep draft, as QBs go. There weren't as many as some years, but I think that a number of the ones taken were strong candidates. Using our pick this year (11) as a reference point, we would have picked squarely between the selections of Blaine Gabbert and Christian Ponder. Both of whom were, in my opinion, significantly better prospects than Tannehill, although both of whom were, also in my opinion, taken earlier than I would have preferred. But I would have actually been in favor of making a move for any of them. And I think you could add a third name to that discussion, with Locker at pick 8, although that one was a bit of a head-scratcher to me. But he would have been in range for the 11th pick, had we wanted to make a move. After that, Dalton and Kaepernick were both taken in the early second. I'd consider Tannehill more in their range, as prospects go. And then you had Mallett in the third.

What that means ultimately is that there are more options. We would have been in a position, with the 11th pick, of choosing to go between Locker, Gabbert and Ponder, or waiting until the 2nd round and making a move for Andy Dalton (or Kaepernick, if that's more your style). Beyond that, if we want to use a later pick in the round as an example, we could feasibly have made a move up into that range with the pick we actually had (26), and made a play on any of those QBs.

This year, in comparison, we're talking about one guy. Tannehill. Because there is, literally, nobody else. And frankly I think that's the one and only reason we're talking about him at all.

I think people are just so desperate for a QB that they'll take whatever they can get. Which is why there's so much excitement for a 5th round pick whose ceiling is likely career backup. Desperation. And now everybody's falling in love with a guy who should by all rights be going in the second round.
Posts: 58,682
keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 AM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.