NFL Draft The team with the best draft by value in 2012 is the.... - Page 3

**jAZ** · 04-29-2012, 03:50 PM

... Pittsburgh Steelers. With KC coming in at #9 according to my calculations and the NFL.com player rating.

I ordered the players by the NFL.com player rating and subtracted their rating position from their draft position. The different between the two is a + number if they were drafted lower than their rating. It's a - number if they were drafted higher than their rating. The 3rd column is the sum total of + and - scores for each player drafted by each team.

Column #1 and #2 are the sum total and average of all player ratings by each team. So if a team drafted 8 players each with a 100 score, they would have 800 for column #1 and 100 for #2. If another team drafted 8 players each with a 50 score, then they would have 400 for #1 and 50 for #2.

listopencil · 04-29-2012, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

A Polar Bear fell on me....
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh shit. Are you OK?

**jAZ** · 04-29-2012, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Hey jaz as an idea can you put down the draft picks and the rankings just for the AFC West teams? It would be interesting to see how it do hell Denver got to a -271

I didn't save my excel file last time, but since I just did it for the ESPN data, here's the AFC West detail from ESPN's info.

Okie_Apparition · 04-29-2012, 11:06 PM

I've seen the phrase CP experts over the last few days
I understand the need to follow so you can blame someone else if it don't work out
but gee wiz

04-29-2012, 11:10 PM

I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.

|Zach| · 04-29-2012, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.

I give this post a C+

**jAZ** · 04-30-2012, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.

Taking your analysis of the draft serious is ludicrous.

Any not-so-serious effort like this is exactly as ludicrous as any not-so-serious draft discussion on here generally.

**HemiEd** · 04-30-2012, 08:53 AM

Hey, we won the division again! Nice to see the Broncos and Raiders so far down the list.

The Dawg · 04-30-2012, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.

**HemiEd** · 04-30-2012, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

That's bull.

There are a couple of people that are the way you describe them, but most of us own up to our mistakes.

I've started a couple of threads specifically to own up to mine, and have talked about others along the way.

As usual, you are the exception.

King_Chief_Fan · 04-30-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd

As usual, you are the exception.

he is a legend in his own mind

**HemiEd** · 04-30-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.

Well haven't you heard? The Redskins are the champions, they gave up their future to get a QB, they know what they are doing.
They have tried every method, this has to work.

King_Chief_Fan · 04-30-2012, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Satanic Goat

Did you own a pocket protector?

he does and he has his own check book with his own money.

ChiefRocka · 04-30-2012, 02:23 PM

Talking about "value" picks is like saying nosebleed seats are great because "you can see the whole play develop"

Bottom line is nobody knows anything for one year.

04-29-2012, 03:50 PM
jAZ Supporter Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Tucson, AZ Casino cash: $9817493	The team with the best draft by value in 2012 is the.... ... Pittsburgh Steelers. With KC coming in at #9 according to my calculations and the NFL.com player rating. I ordered the players by the NFL.com player rating and subtracted their rating position from their draft position. The different between the two is a + number if they were drafted lower than their rating. It's a - number if they were drafted higher than their rating. The 3rd column is the sum total of + and - scores for each player drafted by each team. Column #1 and #2 are the sum total and average of all player ratings by each team. So if a team drafted 8 players each with a 100 score, they would have 800 for column #1 and 100 for #2. If another team drafted 8 players each with a 50 score, then they would have 400 for #1 and 50 for #2.
Posts: 24,800

04-29-2012, 11:06 PM	#33
Okie_Apparition Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: floatin cobwebs n the sky Casino cash: $10004900	I've seen the phrase CP experts over the last few days I understand the need to follow so you can blame someone else if it don't work out but gee wiz
Posts: 7,012

04-29-2012, 11:10 PM	#34
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	I maintain that any effort to grade a 2012 draft in 2012 is ludicrous.
Posts: n/a

04-30-2012, 08:53 AM	#37
HemiEd Supporter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ozarks Casino cash: $-519436	Hey, we won the division again! Nice to see the Broncos and Raiders so far down the list.
Posts: 34,889

04-30-2012, 02:23 PM	#43
ChiefRocka Veteran Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: DE Casino cash: $9735019	Talking about "value" picks is like saying nosebleed seats are great because "you can see the whole play develop" Bottom line is nobody knows anything for one year.
Posts: 3,834