Sandy Vag 2.0 Thread

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I probably would have worded it differently if I had created the thread, but he said if you don't have a good reason to bump a thread, you'll risk taking a vacation... and that's true.

So you are evaluating the reason for a bump.

Originally Posted by Bearcat

It doesn't mean you need a formal "Bump Reason: ..." at the top of your post

Of course you would. Without one, the reason can't be evaluated.

Originally Posted by Bearcat

or a mod is going to ban you on a whim if you randomly bump a thread with nothing more than 'lol'. All you need is a good reason to bump a thread...

How can that reason be evaluated if you insist a reason doesn't need to be offered? Whether you call it formal or not, you're now putting the mods into a position of evaluating the reason for bumps and putting the posters into a position of having to justify those bumps. That's idiotic, on both fronts.

Originally Posted by Bearcat

and you probably don't even need that as long as you don't make a habit of bumping threads for no reason.... and he clarified the OP to say as much in that thread...

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...9&postcount=38

You're making my points about this for me. Y'all have instituted this without giving it enough thought. It's a lousy policy to start with, and you're making it worse with the inability to find a way to even beginning policing it appropriately.