Save Our Chiefs Guy on Radio Today

[Old Dog]

I'm sure I'm the only one, but I didn't care for the part about the poll. Not only was it irrelevant it also sounded to me like, "We want input on who the next GM would be".

I thought you knocked the rest of it out of the park.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Old Dog

I'm sure I'm the only one, but I didn't care for the part about the poll. Not only was it irrelevant it also sounded to me like, "We want input on who the next GM would be".

I thought you knocked the rest of it out of the park.

Well I think most should know that's not what he meant, but ideally he wouldn't have said it. He did a great job. It's a joke that after all that they dwell on that right after the interview.

[Old Dog]

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan

Well I think most should know that's not what he meant, but ideally he wouldn't have said it. He did a great job. It's a joke that after all that they dwell on that right after the interview.

I concur, I know that's not what he was saying, but I was trying to listen to it as someone who had not heard exactly what was going on with the SOC movement would hear it. In that way, it made us look somewhat foolish. I'll stand by my belief that metioning the poll was anything but a good idea.

I understand I'm apt to take some heat for that opinion, but I'm OK with that.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by Old Dog

I'm sure I'm the only one, but I didn't care for the part about the poll. Not only was it irrelevant it also sounded to me like, "We want input on who the next GM would be".

I thought you knocked the rest of it out of the park.

He got kinda led into that one. I don't think it came across as though he was actually trying to identify a legitimate GM or HC candidate, though. It was more like he was talking about fan activity on the site.

Pearson, of course, took it the wrong way as was to be expected.

It's difficult to do one of those interviews without saying something that winds up being misinterpreted. Almost impossible, really.

FAX