If not #1, where?

[the Talking Can]

Originally Posted by RunKC

coaches also get fired for reaching for a QB that is a failure in 3 years.

you're now the dumbest poster on the board...it takes work, but you committed yourself

congrats, champ

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

you're now the dumbest poster on the board...it takes work, but you committed yourself

congrats, champ

No I just don't think Geno is the greatest QB prospect of all-time. Chiefsplanet is the only place on the internet where Geno is just as good as RG3 and better than 95% of QB prospects in the last 10 years.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by RunKC

No I just don't think Geno is the greatest QB prospect of all-time. Chiefsplanet is the only place on the internet where Geno is just as good as RG3 and better than 95% of QB prospects in the last 10 years.

You have said this multiple times. Who thinks Geno is RG3? They don't play the same style and nobody implies they do.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by RunKC

No I just don't think Geno is the greatest QB prospect of all-time. Chiefsplanet is the only place on the internet where Geno is just as good as RG3 and better than 95% of QB prospects in the last 10 years.

List the better prospects in the last 10 years.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by milkman

List the better prospects in the last 10 years.

Here's one right off the bat that you didn't list in your post milkman: Matt Stafford.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Here's one right off the bat that you didn't list in your post milkman: Matt Stafford.

I don't remember the exact questions about Stafford coming out, and I was really high on him.

However, the consensus was that, had Bradford come out, he would have been selected first, not Stafford.

Do you believe that Bradford was a better prospect than Smith?

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by milkman

I don't remember the exact questions about Stafford coming out, and I was really high on him.

If I remember right it was footwork/mechanics, pocket awareness and mobility, decision making, touch on short throws. He was no sure thing, but with an arm like his he was going very high regardless.

I think I remember some people here arguing against him pretty strongly at the time. How he wasn't "worth the #1 pick". That line that seems to be recycled annually here.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

If I remember right it was footwork/mechanics, pocket awareness and mobility, decision making, touch on short throws. He was no sure thing, but with an arm like his he was going very high regardless.

I think I remember some people here arguing against him pretty strongly at the time. How he wasn't "worth the #1 pick". That line that seems to be recycled annually here.

You would think that Geno's accuracy, combined with his arm strength, which is very good, would have him rated nearly as high.

I personally like him better than Stafford, but I can understand how he would be rated a little behind him.

What I don't get is how either could be considered lesser prospects than Bradford.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

If I remember right it was footwork/mechanics, pocket awareness and mobility, decision making, touch on short throws. He was no sure thing, but with an arm like his he was going very high regardless.

I think I remember some people here arguing against him pretty strongly at the time. How he wasn't "worth the #1 pick". That line that seems to be recycled annually here.

He may or may not have been worth the #1 pick but he still struggles with those same exact issues. I remember watching him during the 2008 season throwing dumb interception after dumb interception thinking "This is the #1 guy?".

Four years later, his teams went 2-14, 6-10, 10-6 and 4-12. Stafford still has the same issues.

Without Megatron, the dude would be much worse.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by milkman

I don't remember the exact questions about Stafford coming out, and I was really high on him.

However, the consensus was that, had Bradford come out, he would have been selected first, not Stafford.

Do you believe that Bradford was a better prospect than Smith?

I think Bradford is a slightly better prospect than Geno, but Geno has a higher ceiling IMO because he can make the big play happen more than Sammy.

[the Talking Can]

Originally Posted by RunKC

No I just don't think Geno is the greatest QB prospect of all-time. Chiefsplanet is the only place on the internet where Geno is just as good as RG3 and better than 95% of QB prospects in the last 10 years.

nah, you just don't know anything

i have no idea why a guy who doesn't watch college football insists on shoving his ignorant opinions down our throats....but you do

dumb people generally do dumb things

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by RunKC

No I just don't think Geno is the greatest QB prospect of all-time. Chiefsplanet is the only place on the internet where Geno is just as good as RG3 and better than 95% of QB prospects in the last 10 years.

Completely making shit up, as usual.

See Dane? THIS is where the "OMG it has to be Geno" comes from. Idiots like this INSPIRE the venom.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Completely making shit up, as usual.

See Dane? THIS is where the "OMG it has to be Geno" comes from. Idiots like this INSPIRE the venom.

Gotcha