Chiefs Alex Smith Traded to Chiefs - Page 51

Deberg_1990 · 02-27-2013, 10:59 AM

Well, it looks like the deal is done.

https://twitter.com/intent/user?scre...w_p=tweetembed

Jay Glazer @JayGlazer
49ers have completed a trade with the Chiefs for Alex Smith, tho can't be official til March 12. Chiefs really made a commitment to Smith

Jay Glazer @JayGlazer
Deal has been agreed upon between Chiefs and 49ers. Compensation unclear but I'm told again Chiefs have made a clear commitment to Smith.

Carlota69 · 02-27-2013, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

Its ALL yours honey. Enjoy!
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm not sure how much I'll enjoy, this past year was far from enjoyable. But I'm still a Chiefs fan. I can't just switch teams. Sad, but true.

**DeezNutz** · 02-27-2013, 03:16 PM

Move shows that Reid has a lot of faith in Stanzi to be the backup and perhaps the legit QBOTF.

-King- · 02-27-2013, 03:17 PM

Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report
Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST
Arrowhead Getty Images

It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate.

But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged.

It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

Fish · 02-27-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Namor40

LOL, 9 or 10 wins each year is better than...
.
.
.
.
.

This right here is why Chiefs fans are ****ing idiots. What you type after that point is irrelevant....

**The Franchise** · 02-27-2013, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report
Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST
Arrowhead Getty Images

It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate.

But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged.

It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

Quick....someone paralyze Alex Smith.

O.city · 02-27-2013, 03:20 PM

We essentially just made the 9ers 05 mistake all over. We're taking Alex Smith first overall over Geno, who will turn out to be Aaron Rodgers.

Pathetic.

Frosty · 02-27-2013, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

**dirk digler** · 02-27-2013, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report
Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST
Arrowhead Getty Images

It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate.

But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged.

It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

Just about to post that. We as fans need to voice our displeasure loudly and in their face. We have 2 weeks to change their minds.

**The Franchise** · 02-27-2013, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Just about to post that. We as fans need to voice our displeasure we have 2 weeks to change their minds.

Good luck. A majority of this reeruned fan base is happy with this move.

Hammock Parties · 02-27-2013, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaggyshane

What a sad day in KC history. Not since December 1991 when the KC Royals traded Bret Saberhagen to the Mets for Kevin McReynolds,Greg Jeffries & Kevin Miller have I been more upset.

As a Chiefs season ticket holder for 21 years (1991-2011) I always dreamed of drafting a franchise QB. Now the Chiefs have traded their second round pick and it looks like with the top pick they will go offensive-line, I am appalled at giving up this much for a QB bust.

I was at the 49ers/Chiefs game in 2006 & 2010 and Alex Smith sucked in both games. From 2006 to 2010 Alex Smith showed no growth! Many Chiefs fans in our section laughed and mocked at the fact Alex Smith was the top overall pick. This is the biggest mistake in this franchise history.

Don't put the SAVE OUR CHIEFS airplane back too far in the hanger. We may need it by week 10 or 11 to let our feelings known about Alex Smith.

The Gandalf of Chiefs Nation has spoken.

KC native · 02-27-2013, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Good luck. A majority of this reeruned fan base is happy with this move.

Twitter is much less positive than facebook. There is a chance. Everyone hash tag it up and let your opinion be heard.

bowener · 02-27-2013, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report
Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST
Arrowhead Getty Images

It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate.

But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged.

It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

Dear god let this happen! I hope this is SF running up the price for the Cards.

Pasta Little Brioni · 02-27-2013, 03:24 PM

Are Tru Fans going apeshit?

Spott · 02-27-2013, 03:24 PM

If this is true, I am officially done with this franchise. I'll take what chiefs gear I have left and give it to goodwill(if they will take it). **** Clark Hunt, Andy Reid, Alex Smith and **** me for supporting this dumbass franchise for almost 40 years. This franchise will never, ever change.

Fish · 02-27-2013, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report
Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST
Arrowhead Getty Images

It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate.

But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged.

It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain.

So you're saying we should inform the Chiefs of our opinion?

02-27-2013, 10:59 AM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $284454	Alex Smith Traded to Chiefs Well, it looks like the deal is done. https://twitter.com/intent/user?scre...w_p=tweetembed Jay Glazer @JayGlazer 49ers have completed a trade with the Chiefs for Alex Smith, tho can't be official til March 12. Chiefs really made a commitment to Smith Jay Glazer @JayGlazer Deal has been agreed upon between Chiefs and 49ers. Compensation unclear but I'm told again Chiefs have made a clear commitment to Smith.
Posts: 68,463

02-27-2013, 03:17 PM	#753
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1244257	Chiefs mum on Alex Smith report Posted by Mike Florio on February 27, 2013, 4:10 PM EST Arrowhead Getty Images It’s a given that the 49ers and Chiefs have a deal in place that will send quarterback Alex Smith to Kansas City once the league year starts on March 12 at 4:00 p.m. ET. Indeed, Jay Glazer of FOX wouldn’t be reporting it if it weren’t completely and entirely accurate. But the Chiefs are saying nothing. Through a spokesman, the team said that there will be “no comment” regarding the “rumors” that have emerged. It could be that the Chiefs are simply playing it cool in the event something unforeseen happens. After all, the trade can’t become official until the league year begins. Until then, in theory, the 49ers or the Chiefs could renege.We’ve asked the league office for confirmation as to the apparent reality that the agreement is non-binding until the league year opens in 13 days. If so, there’s a chance — albeit likely remote — that the 49ers or the Chiefs could back away from the bargain. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 65,458

02-27-2013, 03:20 PM	#756
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-565936	We essentially just made the 9ers 05 mistake all over. We're taking Alex Smith first overall over Geno, who will turn out to be Aaron Rodgers. Pathetic.
Posts: 84,162

02-27-2013, 03:24 PM	#763
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $348880	Are Tru Fans going apeshit? __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 72,932

02-27-2013, 03:24 PM	#764
Spott Court Jester Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Orlando Casino cash: $-647600	If this is true, I am officially done with this franchise. I'll take what chiefs gear I have left and give it to goodwill(if they will take it). ** Clark Hunt, Andy Reid, Alex Smith and ** me for supporting this dumbass franchise for almost 40 years. This franchise will never, ever change.
Posts: 20,678