|
|
![]() |
#1 |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $2023447
|
Why?
He's not a Top 5 LT. He's never been within a stone's throw of being All Pro. That's what Joeckel projects to be. He's not going to be an All Pro, but he'll consistently be the #7 or #8 best LT in the league. You'd take Branden Albert at #1 overall this year, knowing what you know now. I'd be willing to take Joeckel for the same reason. I just wouldn't be very happy about it. |
Posts: 59,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
Quote:
He's not even the best tackle on his college team. Matthews, in the few full games I watched of A&M, controlled the point of attack better, showed better power and better awareness at the second level and versus stunts. Joeckel just seems like a "meh." He's definitely not a Thomas or Okung. Not even close. He lacks the power and athleticism of those two and that's what makes you a top tackle in the league. I don't think he's as good as Anthony Costanzo, Nate Solder or Matt Kalil. If you want to know who he reminds me of is another very highly thought of spread system guy that the scouts thought had tons of potential but lack of those elite measurables, athleticism, strength - Jason Smith of the Rams. Quote:
Reads just like Joeckels: Quote:
Their combine results are nearly identical as well. Joeckel: 40 yard: 5.30 Bench: 27 reps Vertical: 28.5 Broad: 106.5 3 Cone: 7.4 20 Yard: 4.68 Smith: 40 yard: 5.22 Bench: 33 reps Vertical: 24.0 Broad: 96.0 3 Cone: 7.53 20 Yard: 4.69 That doesn't scream "Top 10 OT" to me. That speaks of the potential for mediocrity. |
|||
Posts: 15,450
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|