Football Jared Gaither - Page 10

ToxSocks · 12-05-2011, 08:08 PM

Are you ****ing kidding me? Are you guys watching this right now? He's playing better than I've ever seen Richardson play. He's having a great game. There is no way in hell that he doesn't have a place on our starting line.

How can they **** this up? Haley & Pioli: **** YOU.

Thought this would make me feel a little better.....but it doesn't.

I can't believe they cut this guy. WTF were they thinking?

**doomy3** · 12-06-2011, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

He was cut from Baltimore. He was passed on by Oakland. They didn't cut him.

The Chiefs had him. The Chiefs offensive line SUCKS. They cut him and he is starting and playing well in SD 7 days after he was cut.

Given that Haley has continued to support and talk up Palko. Given that Haley let JC ride the bench and started LJ.

Then, we have Waters and Haley getting into it when he first arrived. Waters was let go this year.

Gaither is just another example of a player who is clearly more talented than a starter that was not given a chance.

Was he even cut by Baltimore? I thought they just let him walk in free agency. I'm thinking we're the only team that has actually cut him. But, not every team can be as set along the offensive line as we are.

BoneKrusher · 12-06-2011, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Gaither is just another example of a player who is clearly more talented than a starter that was not given a chance.

and this has happened a lot since Haley's been here.
another example of why he's not qualified to be a HC.

Chiefnj2 · 12-06-2011, 08:41 AM

Gaither has always been known to be a bit of a slacker and not the hardest worker in practice. A few years ago he was a very good tackle for the Ravens, but they grew tired of his work habits and constant "injuries".

He's kind of like Haynesworth, a player with natural talent to play well, but a guy who doesn't really love the game and all that comes with it.

I can't really fault KC for cutting a guy who has a known history of being really lazy and missing lots of practice time. Is he better than Richardson, yes - when he wants to be. This season is a waste anyway, so move on and don't reward a non-team player that might have a negative effect on Hudson or some other younger guys.

Nightfyre · 12-06-2011, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Running backs are a dime a dozen.

Running backs also have some of the most volatile levels of production and some of the shortest shelf-lives in the NFL. Coupled with the fact that there are almost always some sleepers deeper in the draft, it doesn't make sense from a value perspective to draft a runningback really anywhere in the top 20 in my mind.

ChiefsCountry · 12-06-2011, 08:44 AM

Overreaction Planet again.

-King- · 12-06-2011, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge

this is very simple. He didn't fit Haley and Piolis "way". Same as Bernard Pollard. That is my biggest beef with this front office and head coach, is that they will jettison a player if they don't think his attitude meshes completely with what they want, regardless of talent. It is the same model that Pitt has. Look at the players up there. If they don't give 100% all the time to the team "way", they aren't there.

Yeah, but Pollard sucks.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- · 12-06-2011, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

and this has happened a lot since Haley's been here.
another example of why he's not qualified to be a HC.

It has? Like when?
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher · 12-06-2011, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

It has? Like when?
Posted via Mobile Device

three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi

Fansy the Famous Bard · 12-06-2011, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi

Starting Cassell over [Insert Name]

-King- · 12-06-2011, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi

Those are the only 3 that come to mind? Three instances (well 2 because the 2nd one is BS) constitutes as ” happening too much”?
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher · 12-06-2011, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Those are the only 3 that come to mind? Three instances (well 2 because the 2nd one is BS) constitutes as ” happening too much”?
Posted via Mobile Device

the OLine, i know there has to be better linemen on the Roster than BR

-King- · 12-06-2011, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

the OLine, i know there has to be better linemen on the Roster than BR

There isn't.

Who knew that all you had to do to get chiefs planet to cream their shorts was to have an above average game against a 3rd stringer.
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher · 12-06-2011, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

There isn't.

then there's a problem.

-King- · 12-06-2011, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

then there's a problem.

Yeah and Gaither wasn't the solution to that problem.
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher · 12-06-2011, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Yeah and Gaither wasn't the solution to that problem.
Posted via Mobile Device

based on his play with the Chargers last night i beg to differ.

12-05-2011, 08:08 PM
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $2003063	Jared Gaither Are you **ing kidding me? Are you guys watching this right now? He's playing better than I've ever seen Richardson play. He's having a great game. There is no way in hell that he doesn't have a place on our starting line. How can they this up? Haley & Pioli: ** YOU. Thought this would make me feel a little better.....but it doesn't. I can't believe they cut this guy. WTF were they thinking?
Posts: 65,925

12-06-2011, 08:41 AM	#138
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6654388	Gaither has always been known to be a bit of a slacker and not the hardest worker in practice. A few years ago he was a very good tackle for the Ravens, but they grew tired of his work habits and constant "injuries". He's kind of like Haynesworth, a player with natural talent to play well, but a guy who doesn't really love the game and all that comes with it. I can't really fault KC for cutting a guy who has a known history of being really lazy and missing lots of practice time. Is he better than Richardson, yes - when he wants to be. This season is a waste anyway, so move on and don't reward a non-team player that might have a negative effect on Hudson or some other younger guys. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,541

12-06-2011, 08:44 AM	#140
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $-1631248	Overreaction Planet again.
Posts: 52,180