Chiefs According to NFL Network - Page 11

Hog's Gone Fishin · 04-22-2009, 07:09 PM

The Chiefs first pick will be at 13. Washington is putting together their ammo to get this done.

Micjones · 04-22-2009, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

So the teams that every year trade up from the top of the 2nd to the end of the first and pay with a #1 next year, plus their #2 this year are getting robbed?

Trading from, say, #33 up to #27 would only require the #33 and #65 picks.
So, yes, that team would be getting jobbed.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 04-22-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

I=CORKY CORKY CORKY!!!! YAY!!!!

Can someone get me a Corky True Fan to English Dictionary?

Thanks.

Mr. Krab · 04-22-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

For saying you don't give a shit what I think, you sure find a number of ways to work me into conversation.

You'd think I hollowed out your ~~girlfriend~~ goat with the way you skulk around.

The whole reason you're even evolved in the draft is because DC is dead, after the election, and you needs someone to fight. Doomy is your muse, be grateful.

Sully · 04-22-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

He avoided Miami players when basically their whole team was getting drafted...

You're forgetting the best RB in Chiefs history...Donnell Bennett.

Mecca · 04-22-2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully

You're forgetting the best RB in Chiefs history...Donnell Bennett.

I mean when Miami was actually good here in more recent years.

Gdaddy · 04-22-2009, 08:28 PM

According to Joseph White from AP

"That's a party line the Redskins have to toe, at least for now, especially because Sanchez might carry an overwhelming price tag. Seattle is thought to be interested in Sanchez at No. 4, and a move up to No. 3 would likely cost Washington its third-round selection this year and a first-rounder next year - and possibly more".

Which could mean we pick 12, get a second third and a first next year from Washington.

Now how would we take at 12??

ChiefsCountry · 04-22-2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully

You're forgetting the best RB in Chiefs history...Donnell Bennett.

Cue KCJ

Mr. Krab · 04-22-2009, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdaddy

a move up to No. 3 would likely cost Washington its third-round selection this year and a first-rounder next year - and possibly more".

Denver, it's your bid.

**doomy3** · 04-22-2009, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

For saying you don't give a shit what I think, you sure find a number of ways to work me into conversation.

You'd think I hollowed out your ~~girlfriend~~ goat with the way you skulk around.

I actually called you smart FWIW. Said maybe some of your smarts could rub off on ROR if he followed you around enough. But, whatever, take a shot for no reason.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 04-22-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab's

The whole reason you're even evolved in the draft is because DC is dead, after the election, and you needs someone to fight. Doomy is your muse, be grateful.

T0M Cash, A ****tard's ****tard.

LaChapelle · 04-22-2009, 08:32 PM

The Chiefs could auction off the #3 pick to teams wanting to trade up, for the chance to rape Snyder.

SBK · 04-22-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

Trading from, say, #33 up to #27 would only require the #33 and #65 picks.
So, yes, that team would be getting jobbed.

Cleveland did it for Quinn, Carolina did it last year for a T (Otah?), 49ers used it for Staley. It happens every year, part of the reason NE always has 2 first rounders. The trade one of them down and pick up another next year.

SBK · 04-22-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

T0M Cash, A ****tard's ****tard.

Did you out him again?

EyePod · 04-22-2009, 08:36 PM

If it was their 1st, next years 1st, and this year's third. I would have many beers of joy.

EyePod · 04-22-2009, 08:37 PM

Oh, and if this does happen, then this Cassel trade made our pick so much more valuable.

04-22-2009, 07:09 PM
Hog's Gone Fishin Fish are scared of me Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $-1579523	According to NFL Network The Chiefs first pick will be at 13. Washington is putting together their ammo to get this done.
Posts: 40,649

04-22-2009, 08:28 PM	#156
Gdaddy Starter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Fair Haven, NJ Casino cash: $10004900	According to Joseph White from AP "That's a party line the Redskins have to toe, at least for now, especially because Sanchez might carry an overwhelming price tag. Seattle is thought to be interested in Sanchez at No. 4, and a move up to No. 3 would likely cost Washington its third-round selection this year and a first-rounder next year - and possibly more". Which could mean we pick 12, get a second third and a first next year from Washington. Now how would we take at 12??
Posts: 103

04-22-2009, 08:32 PM	#161
LaChapelle Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	The Chiefs could auction off the #3 pick to teams wanting to trade up, for the chance to rape Snyder.
Posts: 8,588

04-22-2009, 08:36 PM	#164
EyePod Forgetting 2013 season end. Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Around Casino cash: $9995735	If it was their 1st, next years 1st, and this year's third. I would have many beers of joy. __________________ I did not believe in Mahomes until week 1. I've been woke ever since. I'm on board this freight train.
Posts: 5,800

04-22-2009, 08:37 PM	#165
EyePod Forgetting 2013 season end. Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Around Casino cash: $9995735	Oh, and if this does happen, then this Cassel trade made our pick so much more valuable. __________________ I did not believe in Mahomes until week 1. I've been woke ever since. I'm on board this freight train.
Posts: 5,800