ChiefsPlanet What does everyone think of supporter powers? - Page 16

**dirk digler** · 01-28-2009, 11:14 AM

To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2.

Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?

allen_kcCard · 01-28-2009, 06:24 PM

I think it should be tied into rep somehow as well personally...make it mean something.

That way the people that are asswipes all the time are vulnerable to people with supporter more, but people that are here long enough with a decent enough rep are more shielded from someone just getting a hankering to take a bad day out on someone.

burt · 01-28-2009, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

This is not entirely about you BK. The only reason I am attacking you personally is because you boasted how you found an old post and "banned his ass". Had you been discrete, I would have had no idea that you were even involved.

Descretion is something we are all so very good at here.......

**Bugeater** · 01-28-2009, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allen_kcCard

I think it should be tied into rep somehow as well personally...make it mean something.

Ooh, I like that idea, an infraction should take away 5,000 rep points.

patteeu · 01-28-2009, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

Now you're throwing around accusations? You're just going to assume that Kyle doesn't pay income tax? Should he send you his tax forms and get an a-ok from you before he files? What nerve you have!

They don't grow them in Montana like they used to, do they? In Idaho, people minded their own business. I always imagined that's the way things were in Montana, but watching this spectacle pretty well dispels that notion. Apparently we've got the profit police operating out there.

It's OK though because the profit police paid their $10 to the state of Montana for their official cardboard badges.

burt · 01-28-2009, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

Ooh, I like that idea, an infraction should take away 5,000 rep points.

The way it's been explained to me....not a bad idea at all.....

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 01-28-2009, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

Ooh, I like that idea, an infraction should take away 5,000 rep points.

This place would go red overnight.

Johnny Vegas · 01-28-2009, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

It's OK though because the profit police paid their $10 to the state of Montana for their official cardboard badges.

momma said you're so bright that's why she calls you son.

burt · 01-28-2009, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

It's OK though because the profit police paid their $10 to the state of Montana for their official cardboard badges.

They don' need no stinkin badges......

burt · 01-28-2009, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

This place would go red overnight.

What...you afraid of being "just" an icon.......

Johnny Vegas · 01-28-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T.B.A.

They don' need no stinkin badges......

heh

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 01-28-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T.B.A.

What...you afraid of being "just" an icon.......

Shit, you can redcan me like Claythan. I only check my rep for the comments people leave. Some of the best ones are neg. Matter of fact, the casino cash whoring thread is the only reason mine is so high. I honestly couldn't give two shits about it.

CoMoChief · 01-28-2009, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

Ooh, I like that idea, an infraction should take away 5,000 rep points.

No one on here really gives 2 shits about rep.

Just sayin'

Pos rep is a thoughtful gesture, but really if anyone neg rep bombs me etc, I really dont lose much sleep over it.

**jjchieffan** · 01-28-2009, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding

Okay I see where you are coming from.

I don't want this little tiff to spill over either. I've never gotten into an argument w/ you before on any other topic, I hope to keep it that way.

I agree. No need for this to go overboard. I have never had a problem with you. I just decided since the topic had a thread dedicated to it, I would weigh in with my opinion. FWIW, and I will probably get banned for this, but what the hey. Chiefdawn is my wife. I used to her account last week to start the bogus thread because I wanted to make a point about everyone overreacting to the fake Herm and Pioli threads without getting banned myself. (which went exactly the way I expected it to) People get so worked up over something so trivial. It is fine to start threads about poop or blowing your wad in someones face, but god forbid someone start a thread that is misleading. As I have said before, Use the ignore thread feature if you don't want to see it. I do. Instead, people keep the thread on the front page by posting in it. So, if 5 of you want to red card card and ban me, fine. I can still lurk. I can live without posting for a few days.

CoMoChief · 01-28-2009, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I agree. No need for this to go overboard. I have never had a problem with you. I just decided since the topic had a thread dedicated to it, I would weigh in with my opinion. FWIW, and I will probably get banned for this, but what the hey. Chiefdawn is my wife. I used to her account last week to start the bogus thread because I wanted to make a point about everyone overreacting to the fake Herm and Pioli threads without getting banned myself. (which went exactly the way I expected it to) People get so worked up over something so trivial. It is fine to start threads about poop or blowing your wad in someones face, but god forbid someone start a thread that is misleading. As I have said before, Use the ignore thread feature if you don't want to see it. I do. Instead, people keep the thread on the front page by posting in it. So, if 5 of you want to red card card and ban me, fine. I can still lurk. I can live without posting for a few days.

burt · 01-28-2009, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Shit, you can redcan me like Claythan.

Wouldn't be nearly as fun....

View Poll Results: What do you think about the supporter powers
Great Idea	26	43.33%
A little too much power for me	14	23.33%
A really stupid idea	20	33.33%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

01-28-2009, 11:14 AM
dirk digler Please squeeze Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $94644	What does everyone think of supporter powers? To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2. Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong. On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately. So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?
Posts: 67,123

01-28-2009, 06:24 PM	#226
allen_kcCard Veteran Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $2133183	I think it should be tied into rep somehow as well personally...make it mean something. That way the people that are asswipes all the time are vulnerable to people with supporter more, but people that are here long enough with a decent enough rep are more shielded from someone just getting a hankering to take a bad day out on someone.
Posts: 2,783