|
![]() |
#16 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $1649653
|
Seriously you all realize he didn't play against the Texans and they had the most points, the most total yards, and the 2nd most rushing yards that we have allowed all, season. You can't just pick one game where the D was good and decide "wow, our D must be better without Jones!" especially since the first game he missed was our worst defensive performance. Cuz I can find that he played in that our D performed almost just as well. Maybe it has more to do with the opponent, then it does with Jones being out. Flacco is the absolute worst starter in the NFL, so we stacked the box. That allowed an extra run defender. Seriously how are some of you so dumb?
|
Posts: 17,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Bring it on Ahab!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Doo-Dah
Casino cash: $10015152
|
Were they better last week?
Shut the **** up. This board's hatred of Chris Jones is ****ing reeruned. |
Posts: 14,861
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Bring it on Ahab!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Doo-Dah
Casino cash: $10015152
|
Quote:
Color me skeptical of Chris jones never being double teamed and always running out of his gap. It's horse-shit nonsense and has been since the start. He's not just out there doing whatever he wants. That's ****ing narrative that exists on this site and this site alone because people wanted to scapegoat someone. Meanwhile this site was sucking Damien Wilson's cock and subbing in Ragland (a figure loathed on the planet) for him made a far bigger impact. Someone who was getting DOWNHILL in the running game instead if sitting back in his gap playing the waiting game. Stop with the mental gymnastics to support the chosen narrative, and let'st just settle ****ing down after 1 good game from the defense. They're going to have to step up HUGE in the next month. Last edited by WhiteWhale; 10-19-2019 at 02:57 PM.. |
|
Posts: 14,861
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
Casino cash: $3157775
|
Better against the run?
Maybe But I’m still not ready to pull the plug on Sacksquatch, hoping he’ll eventually buy in to a less selfish style of play |
Posts: 92,306
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $1632295
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 28,127
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $1632295
![]() |
Chris Jones is one of my favorite players. If Mahomes wasn't on the team I'd probably have a Chris Jones jersey. But this defense looked pretty bad until last night, so it's fair to analyze what things we did differently, including who was playing where.
|
Posts: 28,127
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $1544910
|
Quote:
But if you didn't see gaping holes right in Jones' spot several times before he left the line-up, I don't know what to tell you. It was pretty glaring. Of course, nobody was playing well, and there were gaping holes everywhere. |
|
Posts: 17,575
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $1649653
|
Quote:
10 PA, 307 Total Yards, 178 Pass YDs, 129 rush yards, 5 QB hits, 3 Sacks, 2 TOs I'd consider that pretty dominant. Yeah we had a lot more sacks because Donk line is trash and Joe Flacco takes sacks. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Posts: 17,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Quebec, Canada
Casino cash: $9994975
|
That's kind of a stupid question.
Jones is arguably the Chiefs best defensive player. The Chiefs defense is obviously better with him. The guy is an All-Pro. Yeah definitly a stupid question. I know this a forum but why do people always overreact off of one game. |
Posts: 2,393
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $1649653
|
Yep guessing the dumb ****s here forgot all about the Raiders game.
|
Posts: 17,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $1544910
|
I think at least half of the overreaction is regarding the mischaracterization that people are somehow saying Jones sucks.
That's not what anyone's saying. |
Posts: 17,575
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
CP'S "MOST HATED" 😆
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $2060400
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 4,529
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2017
Casino cash: $9990400
|
|
Posts: 10,605
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2017
Casino cash: $9990400
|
Quote:
We are talking about whether the defensive system is better without someone going rogue all the time. If the center of your defense breaks down it can create problems everywhere. It allows C/G to get to your LB, it breaks down the entire scheme. I wonder if Jones wouldn't be better at DE for the Defense as a whole. If Jones isn't back next week against Packers we'll find out. |
|
Posts: 10,605
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $9089447
|
The defense was better because they played physical, aggressive, TEAM defense. Every guy busting their ass to do their job. Flacco and Denver didn’t hurt either...
If Jones comes in and does that as well, the defense will be much better as a whole. |
Posts: 26,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|