ChiefsPlanet What does everyone think of supporter powers? - Page 3

**dirk digler** · 01-28-2009, 11:14 AM

To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2.

Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong.

On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately.

So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?

**Buck** · 01-28-2009, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

It is ****in reeruned we give a Chargers fan that kinda power on a Chiefs board.

Just sayin

And just how much money have you donated to keep this board running?

**Bugeater** · 01-28-2009, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

I have avatars and sigs turned off so I don't see them anyway. So who is that user?

I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.

**the Talking Can** · 01-28-2009, 12:17 PM

i don't have them, but it is fine by me

and shtsprayer should have been permanently banned a long time ago for the racist crap he spews...

**dirk digler** · 01-28-2009, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.

ok thanks

**ShortRoundChief** · 01-28-2009, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

I don't recall, it's someone who doesn't post very often.

Mine are off as well.

**ShortRoundChief** · 01-28-2009, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

So just to clarify you don't think what happened to shtsprayer was wrong and no one abused their power?

I too would very much like an answer to this question.

**Bugeater** · 01-28-2009, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

ok thanks

I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

**dirk digler** · 01-28-2009, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

I found it, it's dtebbe. Here's his avatar:

and it's titled "A banana for every monkey".

That is kind of funny in a disturbing way I guess

**ShortRoundChief** · 01-28-2009, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

It wasn't so much the banning as the attitude of; I can do it, I did it, I have my reasons, I don't care what you think.

That's horseshit and you know it.

Nobody came off that way. Patteu framed it up that way.

**Iowanian** · 01-28-2009, 12:33 PM

Many of us have donated over the years, but not under those terms.

Personally, I think its a decent concept to allow others to as a group, moderate indecent behavior, however I don't like the idea of a (not all of you) douchebag buying that kind of power. A couple of you are pretty cocky about it.

Personally, I'd rather see the infraction stick handed to mod selected long tenured members.

**Buck** · 01-28-2009, 12:36 PM

Iowanian,

I don't donate just so I can have the powers, I donated to donate and later found out that we had the ability to give out warnings for bad posts.

As far as being cocky about it, its human nature to flex your muscles sometimes, everyone does...even you.

**Bugeater** · 01-28-2009, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

That is kind of funny in a disturbing way I guess

So it's funny when dtebbe does it, but unacceptable when Shtsprayer does it?

**Iowanian** · 01-28-2009, 12:38 PM

I don't have a problem with the assistance provided when mods are gone. I have a problem with buying it.

**Buck** · 01-28-2009, 12:39 PM

Yeah thats pretty racist no matter which way you look at it, I'm surprised they haven't been asked to change it.

**Baby Lee** · 01-28-2009, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

It wasn't so much the banning as the attitude of; I can do it, I did it, I have my reasons, I don't care what you think.

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

That's horseshit and you know it.

Nobody came off that way. Patteu framed it up that way.

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Um, read the thread. I wasn't personal until he took it there. As far as your opinion on the matter, it really doesn't matter.

I'm not going to apologize for what I did, nor do I care if it upset any of you. The fact that he slights the mans race with every post he makes offends me. I let him know. Period.

Now, even though I didn't need to, I feel I've defended myself enough on this issue and am done commenting on it.

View Poll Results: What do you think about the supporter powers
Great Idea	26	43.33%
A little too much power for me	14	23.33%
A really stupid idea	20	33.33%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

01-28-2009, 11:14 AM
dirk digler Please squeeze Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $104644	What does everyone think of supporter powers? To add some background supporters pay $10 a month and they get the ability to issue infractions or warnings and if the person gets enough of infractions he gets temp ban for a day or 2. Some of the people in DC are upset that shtsprayer got temp banned because of some comments he made and believe that supporter powers are too strong. On the flip side DaFace made a good point yesterday that if it wasn't for the few of us supporters Malboro Chief would have posted a ton of porn yesterday but we were able to ban him almost immediately. So what does everyone think? Good idea, bad idea?
Posts: 67,121

01-28-2009, 12:17 PM	#33
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $9122208	i don't have them, but it is fine by me and shtsprayer should have been permanently banned a long time ago for the racist crap he spews... __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

01-28-2009, 12:33 PM	#40
Iowanian Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Utopia Casino cash: $1658454	Many of us have donated over the years, but not under those terms. Personally, I think its a decent concept to allow others to as a group, moderate indecent behavior, however I don't like the idea of a (not all of you) douchebag buying that kind of power. A couple of you are pretty cocky about it. Personally, I'd rather see the infraction stick handed to mod selected long tenured members.
Posts: 62,945

01-28-2009, 12:36 PM	#41
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $5950295	Iowanian, I don't donate just so I can have the powers, I donated to donate and later found out that we had the ability to give out warnings for bad posts. As far as being cocky about it, its human nature to flex your muscles sometimes, everyone does...even you.
Posts: 44,607

01-28-2009, 12:38 PM	#43
Iowanian Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Utopia Casino cash: $1658454	I don't have a problem with the assistance provided when mods are gone. I have a problem with buying it.
Posts: 62,945

01-28-2009, 12:39 PM	#44
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $5950295	Yeah thats pretty racist no matter which way you look at it, I'm surprised they haven't been asked to change it.
Posts: 44,607