***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Nirvana58]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

So, vaccinated or tested (once per week)? THAT'S what you're worried about?

Yes. That is bad enough. But you also missed this part.

Biden plans to sign an executive order requiring all government employees be vaccinated against Covid-19, with no option of being regularly tested to opt out. The President will also sign an order directing the same standard be applied to employees of contractors who do business with the federal government

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by TLO

Good

Agreed. I am ****ing chuckling now that I think about this. My ex who I posted about awhile back just started her traveling nurse job up in Iowa because she didn't want to get vaccinated. What an idiot.

[jdubya]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Sounds like if you work for a hospital or any health care field that receives federal Medicaid or Medicare money you will be required to get vaccinated.

Hopefully those that don't want to get vaccinated can have an opt out clause where they can consent to testing once a week.

[Nirvana58]

Originally Posted by jdubya

Hopefully those that don't want to get vaccinated can have an opt out clause where they can consent to testing once a week.

How many companies are going to pay for that? I guarantee the government won't.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by Nirvana58

How many companies are going to pay for that? I guarantee the government won't.

Employee?

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Nirvana58

Tin foil hat? Do you read the news? It is on the front page

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/09/polit...ech/index.html

It went over your unvaxxed head, apparently.

Was in reference to your implication that the CDC made a recommendation (based on a study) simply because there's a Federal Employee Vax Mandate coming.

Don't wanna wear a shirt and shoes? Don't eat/shop at that establishment.

Don't wanna get vaxxed? (even though you're already vaxxed for countless other things) Don't work for the Government.

Easy, peasy.

[Nirvana58]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15

It went over your unvaxxed head, apparently.

Was in reference to your implication that the CDC made a recommendation (based on a study) simply because there's a Federal Employee Vax Mandate coming.

Don't wanna wear a shirt and shoes? Don't eat/shop at that establishment.

Don't wanna get vaxxed? (even though you're already vaxxed for countless other things) Don't work for the Government.

Easy, peasy.

Geez. Take off your tin foil hat. I said I wish the cdc would look at more data before making a recommendation. Especially when there is a lot of conflicting studies saying the opposite.

Wouldn't you want all the facts before our government starts mandating vaccines. Since we are all about the science.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Nirvana58

Geez. Take off your tin foil hat. I said I wish the cdc would look at more data before making a recommendation. Especially when there is a lot of conflicting studies saying the opposite.

Wouldn't you want all the facts before our government starts mandating vaccines. Since we are all about the science.

There is, literally, no such thing as "all the facts" and even you understand that. They are going to side with the preponderance of evidence, as they should.

[wazu]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15

Don't wanna get vaxxed? (even though you're already vaxxed for countless other things) Don't work for the Government.

Easy, peasy.

I haven't read through all of what this is, but isn't the mandate for all businesses employing 100+ people?

[jdubya]

Originally Posted by Nirvana58

How many companies are going to pay for that? I guarantee the government won't.

If the company mandates it, they should pay for it.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by jdubya

If the company mandates it, they should pay for it.

Just as they do with other requirements, like a dress code.

[jdubya]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Just as they do with other requirements, like a dress code.

You ever hear of a uniform allowance?

[TLO]

This is going to cause some outrage.

[RedRaider56]

Originally Posted by wazu

I haven't read through all of what this is, but isn't the mandate for all businesses employing 100+ people?

yes, that is what I read

[Rainbarrel]

The unvaccinated are starting to be treated like freeloaders.