|
![]() |
#826 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $-1310345
|
Colts and Pittman agree to a 3 year extension. 71.5 million
|
Posts: 42,078
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#827 | |
CP'S "MOST HATED" 😆
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $-1009600
|
Quote:
We might get him, we might not. But these are the cheap, undervalued guys Veach loves imo. |
|
Posts: 5,421
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#828 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $-1310345
|
![]() |
Posts: 42,078
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#829 |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Missouri
Casino cash: $3072700
|
Well, something tells me this is Trey Smith's last year here if guards are getting paid that much now.
__________________
Why don't we just wait here a little while? See what happens. |
Posts: 1,285
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#830 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $-1854947
|
|
Posts: 19,257
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#831 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $-98384
![]() |
|
Posts: 106,699
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#832 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $-98384
![]() |
|
Posts: 106,699
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#833 |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Shrewsbury England
Casino cash: $-864410
|
Interior OL is a low key need for the Chiefs in the draft. They aren't going to pay Smith and Creed H
|
Posts: 2,630
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#834 |
CP'S "MOST HATED" 😆
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $-1009600
|
EXACTLY. The last WR's we got who had 800 plus yards multiple times before coming to KC was who? SAMMY WATKINS and JUJU. Claypool is younger and cheaper than both of those guys were when we got them. Too many folks love to look at the surface without taking a look at things in finer details. Put Claypool with Pat and I'd be extremely confident he does better than MVS, Watson, Moore and Toney. No doubts whatsoever.
|
Posts: 5,421
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#835 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1284257
|
|
Posts: 65,458
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#836 |
Forever Royal
Join Date: Mar 2012
Casino cash: $-1758700
|
|
Posts: 26,502
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#837 |
CP'S "MOST HATED" 😆
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $-1009600
|
|
Posts: 5,421
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#838 |
...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $-1557705
![]() |
Oh I definitely don't want to bet it all on Claypool. We need to either have a solid FA add, or a high draft pick spent. Signing somebody like Claypool would need to be in addition to that.
|
Posts: 30,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#839 |
CP'S "MOST HATED" 😆
Join Date: Feb 2018
Casino cash: $-1009600
|
Appreciate it. Went back and watched his two years playing with Big Ben and it was eye opening. Kid had everything and was winning at all three levels plus doing sweeps and Jet plays. We'd have nothing to lose taking a chance on him imo.
|
Posts: 5,421
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#840 |
...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $-1557705
![]() |
We are losing the following WRs this year unless they come back on a new FA contract:
Mecole Hardman Justin Watson MVS Richie James Claypool has played at a higher level than any of those four. We have room. |
Posts: 30,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|