The Chiefs start off 4-2 and change to Brodie Croyle - Page 6

Logical · 06-19-2007, 11:57 PM

They then proceed to lose 3 close fought games in a row. Do you support sticking with Croyle or changing back to Huard?

Hootie you don't need to vote.

Hootie · 09-28-2007, 08:24 AM

for the record...another thread I owned THE MAQ in...

if you're reading this, go back and edit all your posts so you're just a little off...isn't that what THE MAQ does?!

Hootie · 09-28-2007, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

Trent, a pro bowl QB?! You've got to be kidding me!

He couldn't even complete a 3 yard pass to LJ in the flats...he is rattled now, for good...

Without Roaf protecting his blindside, Green is simply an average QB, at the very best.

And so is Huard...but at least Huard can find his playmakers rather than force the ball to Samie Parker (Green's weapon of choice!)

I'm good at this stuff...

patteeu · 09-28-2007, 09:13 AM

Once they change, I don't think they should go back unless (a) Croyle is playing only because Huard was injured and Huard is ready to come back, (b) Croyle is injured or (c) they decide that Croyle is not the QBOTF. I might support a change if Croyle is stinking it up in a playoff game and the coaches think bringing Huard in might give the team a "spark" but I'm not sure.

Edit: Ooops, didnt' see that this was an old thread. I'm glad my answer is consistent with my original or that would be embarrassing.

**Tribal Warfare** · 09-28-2007, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

I'm good at this stuff...

funniest post EVA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Micjones · 09-28-2007, 09:39 AM

I just can't see a change at QB after a 4-2 start, but I'd stick it out with Croyle if he were given the job.

That way we can decide whether to stick with him next season or move on.

06-19-2007, 11:57 PM
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	The Chiefs start off 4-2 and change to Brodie Croyle They then proceed to lose 3 close fought games in a row. Do you support sticking with Croyle or changing back to Huard? Hootie you don't need to vote.
Posts: 31,579

09-28-2007, 08:24 AM	#76
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	for the record...another thread I owned THE MAQ in... if you're reading this, go back and edit all your posts so you're just a little off...isn't that what THE MAQ does?!
Posts: 56,356

09-28-2007, 09:13 AM	#78
patteeu The 23rd Pillar Join Date: Sep 2002 Casino cash: $10019237	Once they change, I don't think they should go back unless (a) Croyle is playing only because Huard was injured and Huard is ready to come back, (b) Croyle is injured or (c) they decide that Croyle is not the QBOTF. I might support a change if Croyle is stinking it up in a playoff game and the coaches think bringing Huard in might give the team a "spark" but I'm not sure. Edit: Ooops, didnt' see that this was an old thread. I'm glad my answer is consistent with my original or that would be embarrassing. __________________ “Boy, you all want power. God, I hope you never get it.” - Lindsay Graham
Posts: 110,871

09-28-2007, 09:39 AM	#80
Micjones Whose house? Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10005180	I just can't see a change at QB after a 4-2 start, but I'd stick it out with Croyle if he were given the job. That way we can decide whether to stick with him next season or move on.
Posts: 15,344