Chiefs ***Official Chiefs Will Beat Denver Thread*** - Page 7

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 06:04 PM

Three of the Donkeys top receivers including their two best ones are out, the locker room is falling apart, and their QB sucks without star receivers. Last time Hali faced Clady he came away with three sacks. Winning will double our win total from last year and likely lose us the rights to Eric Berry

But it's always nice to beat Denver in Denver no matter the cost. This win will be bittersweet.

**DeezNutz** · 01-02-2010, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

McCoy.

Ah...I see your Schwartz is as big as mine...

Dante84 · 01-02-2010, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Tell me again why the Steelers won a Super Bowl. Was it because of a running back?

Tell me again why the Giants won a Super Bowl. Was it because of a running back?

I think the last team you can legitimately make a case for as winning a Super Bowl because of a RB they drafted is...the Ravens. The Rams traded for Faulk, Dillon was a trade if memory serves....I don't see a lot of teams going to the Super Bowl after spending a top five pick on a running back.

*Who is your pick then? Danarrio(sp)?

*if no Berry, Suh, Clausen, Okung

Hammock Parties · 01-02-2010, 08:02 PM

Oh, I'm on that safety bandwagon. Believe it. I dunno who else to pick, though. I wont be thrilled with a running back. We have a good, potentially Pro Bowl running back. We don't need to be handing another one 40 million.

Too many negatives.

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:02 PM

If we win this game I say Mays or McClain has to be the pick. I also don't see Alexander going in the second round... but that might be because I'm not a Mizzou Fan.

keg in kc · 01-02-2010, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

If we win this game I say Mays or McClain has to be the pick. I also don't see Alexander going in the second round... but that might be because I'm not a Mizzou Fan.

Mays?

At 3??

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

Mays?

At 3??

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

-King- · 01-02-2010, 08:04 PM

I just read every post in this thread and there's 1 thing that I can't understands....

Why are these posts in this thread? How the **** did this turn into a draft thread?

FWIW, I think keg is right. As nice as spiller would be, he's a luxury. McClain isn't that big of a reach and unlike spiller, he actually helps a position that's in deep need.

But hopefully berry will still be on the board during our pick....so we can skip over him and draft okung. To the bicycle!!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

keg in kc · 01-02-2010, 08:05 PM

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

-King- · 01-02-2010, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

But I think worst case scenario is like at 5. I have never been impressed with mays pass coverage.
Posted via Mobile Device

keg in kc · 01-02-2010, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

We won't be picking third overall if we win.

My question would be the same regardless of which pick we have, whether it's 3 or 13 or 23. Okay, maybe not 23.

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

In the second round I would love Mike Iupati if hes there... hes like the Branden Albert prospect of the right side... put I would much rather just leave him at guard.

**DeezNutz** · 01-02-2010, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops.

(where's my pot-stirring smilie)

Games are won in the trenches by guys with fire in their bellies.

This is the type of process that will enable us to change the culture and find the right 53.

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

But I think worst case scenario is like at 5. I have never been impressed with mays pass coverage.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hes not used in coverage the same way as Berry is... but I really think he could cover in the right scheme and I think all of his problems are coachable.. you really should expect rookies to be projects their first few years anyways. Bob Saunders really wasn't a coverage guy either.. but like Mays he could hit and break up passes. The difference is Mays is much bigger, faster, more athletic, and not injury prone. I've heard a lot of Roy Williams comparisions that I really don't see.. but even so Roy Williams was a Pro Bowl Safety every year in this scheme under Parcells. I see Mays as a SS for us which I think would utilize his talents and not waste them like being a FS in a Cover One defense does.

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:18 PM

I don't want Mays for his coverage skills, I want him for his hard hitting and big impact player presence. He has the ability to cover and him getting those skills after a few years in the NFL would be a major bonus. He has the highest ceiling of anyone.

RustShack · 01-02-2010, 08:23 PM

The thing about USC's defense is its kinda like Herms. It can be great, but you need great players everywhere. If you don't you look bad no matter how good you are.

01-02-2010, 06:04 PM
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3036954	*Official Chiefs Will Beat Denver Thread* Three of the Donkeys top receivers including their two best ones are out, the locker room is falling apart, and their QB sucks without star receivers. Last time Hali faced Clady he came away with three sacks. Winning will double our win total from last year and likely lose us the rights to Eric Berry But it's always nice to beat Denver in Denver no matter the cost. This win will be bittersweet.
Posts: 15,126

01-02-2010, 08:02 PM	#93
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $800478	Oh, I'm on that safety bandwagon. Believe it. I dunno who else to pick, though. I wont be thrilled with a running back. We have a good, potentially Pro Bowl running back. We don't need to be handing another one 40 million. Too many negatives. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 297,437

01-02-2010, 08:02 PM	#94
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3036954	If we win this game I say Mays or McClain has to be the pick. I also don't see Alexander going in the second round... but that might be because I'm not a Mizzou Fan. __________________
Posts: 15,126

01-02-2010, 08:04 PM	#97
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1424257	I just read every post in this thread and there's 1 thing that I can't understands.... Why are these posts in this thread? How the **** did this turn into a draft thread? FWIW, I think keg is right. As nice as spiller would be, he's a luxury. McClain isn't that big of a reach and unlike spiller, he actually helps a position that's in deep need. But hopefully berry will still be on the board during our pick....so we can skip over him and draft okung. To the bicycle!!!!!! Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 65,479

01-02-2010, 08:05 PM	#98
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	I think we should draft a tackle, cause it's a safe pick. I mean, you at least get a guard out of it if he flops. (where's my pot-stirring smilie)
Posts: 58,682

01-02-2010, 08:18 PM	#104
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3036954	I don't want Mays for his coverage skills, I want him for his hard hitting and big impact player presence. He has the ability to cover and him getting those skills after a few years in the NFL would be a major bonus. He has the highest ceiling of anyone. __________________
Posts: 15,126

01-02-2010, 08:23 PM	#105
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3036954	The thing about USC's defense is its kinda like Herms. It can be great, but you need great players everywhere. If you don't you look bad no matter how good you are. __________________
Posts: 15,126