Chiefs We need to extend Alex Smith - Page 8

Alex Smith 4Ever · 01-05-2014, 02:42 PM

Alex played the game of his life and he was BETRAYED by the defense

Alex Smith dropped 44 points on the Colts and somehow still lost. Alex is a hero. 44 points can win you a SUPERBOWL. What happened to the best defense in the league? They sure weren't out there tonight. You could cut all of them and it wouldn't matter. What matters is having Alex.

ChiefsCountry · 01-05-2014, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Brady Quinn is the next Len Dawson.

Never said that Frank.
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255566

**DeezNutz** · 01-05-2014, 03:34 PM

Luck is a better QB than Smith, but I think the latter played as well if not better yesterday.

**Mav** · 01-05-2014, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief

Only on a cap friendly deal in the Chiefs favor.

that's why I said 5 years 50 mil.

10 mil a year, is MODEST for a franchise qb.

Molitoth · 01-05-2014, 03:35 PM

There is no NEED to extend Alex Smith. Alex WANTS to be in KC and WANTS to be Andy Reids QB. There is no THREAT that he is leaving town, therefore there should be no hurry to toss him a bunch of money. He had a handful of good games this season, at least half of his games were garbage.

Quit being an idiot.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-05-2014, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief

Only on a cap friendly deal in the Chiefs favor.

If he didn't win you over yesterday, you should probably just post how there's nothing he can do to make you an Alex Smith fan.

Marcellus · 01-05-2014, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

The defensive ineptitude made it critical for the offense to be perfect, and they weren't. They were really, really good, with the best player out the entire game.

Now, could the offense have made a couple of extra plays to seal the win and save the D's ass? Of course. But perfection is a pretty hard standard in terms of assigning blame.

See the other thread on who wins when the defense gives up 45.

All that said, and being a Smith supporter, we only extend him at a decent price.

Hell I'm willing to overpay for him as long as the length is reasonable.

BigCatDaddy · 01-05-2014, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

5 years 90m I think Alex would take it.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-05-2014, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth

There is no NEED to extend Alex Smith. Alex WANTS to be in KC and WANTS to be Andy Reids QB. There is no THREAT that he is leaving town, therefore there should be no hurry to toss him a bunch of money. He had a handful of good games this season, at least half of his games were garbage.

Quit being an idiot.

You're right. We should wait until he has more weapons to work with, and the Chiefs have less leverage so we can pay him more next year.

And we are all the idiots. Right.

Eleazar · 01-05-2014, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Save the hyperbole.

If you think this was a team loss, then you're exactly what TK said.

A miserable human being.

No sane, rational person would put any of this loss on the offense or Alex Smith. It's cherry picking bullshit that wants to paint everyone as the culprit when there was only one side of the ball that didn't hold up their bargain.

44 ****ing points playing without Charles and his 2nd WR and you want to tell me this was a team loss. **** off with the sports cliches.

^ exactly

**The Bad Guy** · 01-05-2014, 03:36 PM

I'm not giving him 5 and 90. I'm giving him 3 at 35-36 on top of next year so it'd basically be 4 at 44.

ShowtimeSBMVP · 01-05-2014, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

that's why I said 5 years 50 mil.

10 mil a year, is MODEST for a franchise qb.

No way Alex would take that.

**Mav** · 01-05-2014, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I'm not giving him 5 and 90. I'm giving him 3 at 35-36 on top of next year so it'd basically be 4 at 44.

so the difference in our thinking is 2 mil. Id prefer the years over the dollars.

As a fan, and im sure Alex would to.

Marcellus · 01-05-2014, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I'm not giving him 5 and 90. I'm giving him 3 at 35-36 on top of next year so it'd basically be 4 at 44.

Shit bump it to 4 at $48MM and call it good. Make it front loaded and easy to dump in 3 years if need be.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-05-2014, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

No way Alex would take that.

I think he'd take 12 million a year.

Guy has made his money in this league.

**Mav** · 01-05-2014, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

No way Alex would take that.

Alex wants to be shown loyalty. He CARES nothing about the dollar figure. He wants to be embraced by the franchise.

Just my opinion. But he has always shown that loyalty is much more important than MONEY.

01-05-2014, 02:42 PM
Alex Smith 4Ever Starter Join Date: Feb 2013 Casino cash: $10005192	We need to extend Alex Smith Alex played the game of his life and he was BETRAYED by the defense Alex Smith dropped 44 points on the Colts and somehow still lost. Alex is a hero. 44 points can win you a SUPERBOWL. What happened to the best defense in the league? They sure weren't out there tonight. You could cut all of them and it wouldn't matter. What matters is having Alex.
Posts: 182

01-05-2014, 03:35 PM	#109
Molitoth Mahomes Fanboi Join Date: Apr 2004 Casino cash: $164969	There is no NEED to extend Alex Smith. Alex WANTS to be in KC and WANTS to be Andy Reids QB. There is no THREAT that he is leaving town, therefore there should be no hurry to toss him a bunch of money. He had a handful of good games this season, at least half of his games were garbage. Quit being an idiot.
Posts: 20,299

01-05-2014, 03:36 PM	#115
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	I'm not giving him 5 and 90. I'm giving him 3 at 35-36 on top of next year so it'd basically be 4 at 44. __________________
Posts: 23,216