Blaylock part of Green trade?

Wile_E_Coyote · 10-27-2004, 05:45 PM

Chiefs' Blaylock in Awkward Position

By STEVE BRISENDINE
AP Sports Writer

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) -- Four touchdowns against the NFL's top run defense would earn most backups a starting job and an exemption from special teams duty. Derrick Blaylock's situation is anything but typical, though.
Blaylock scored four of the Kansas City Chiefs' NFL-record eight TDs rushing and followed one of his scores with a tackle on the ensuing kickoff in Sunday's 56-10 victory over Atlanta.

But in his fourth NFL season and with the end of his contract approaching, Blaylock finds himself stuck between the greatest back in franchise history and a disgruntled No. 1 draft pick who coach Dick Vermeil still insists will make an impact in Kansas City.

"I can't think about that right now," said Blaylock, whose 122 yards this year are already a career high. "I'm focused on this season right now."

Blaylock played much of the second half Sunday, finishing with 90 yards on 19 carries, after Priest Holmes - who also scored four touchdowns and set up Blaylock for a gimme 1-yard TD by just missing a fifth - sustained a mild ankle sprain.

Holmes did not practice Wednesday, but could start Sunday against Indianapolis, and Vermeil said he expects second-year back Larry Johnson to be active for that game.

Johnson, an insurance No. 1 pick in 2003 when Holmes was coming off hip surgery, has been inactive for four of six games this year. Although Vermeil expected to use him against the Colts, Blaylock's status as Holmes' top backup doesn't seem to be in any immediate danger.

"I get such a thrill out of seeing a guy do what he has done, coming from where he has come and developing his skills," Vermeil said. "It's a great salute to (running backs coach) James Saxon, who works with him, and the coaches who have confidence in him."

Blaylock came to Kansas City in 2001 as part of a deal that brought Pro Bowl quarterback Trent Green to the Chiefs.

Kansas City had to give the St. Louis Rams their first- and third-round picks in exchange for Green. But they also demanded an extra fifth-round pick from the Rams in return for those concessions and used that to take Blaylock out of Stephen F. Austin.

He was inactive throughout the 2001 season, gained 72 yards in 12 games in 2002 and saw backup duty at running back in 15 games last year, when he ran for 112 yards on 22 carries.

"I've been patient the whole time I've been here. I knew eventually I'd get a chance to play," Blaylock said. "The main thing is you've got to be patient and wait your turn, and your turn will come.

"I went out there Sunday and got the job done, therefore they have more faith in me."

Whether that faith translates into a free-agent offer remains to be seen.

This week, Vermeil hinted at a larger role for Blaylock without saying where he envisioned that happening.

"This opens the eyes of people around (the league) that he may be a starting running back," Vermeil said. "But to me, that's coaching satisfaction."

Hammock Parties · 10-27-2004, 05:47 PM

Cool. I'm still not sure how good Blaylock is. I don't think he's as good as he showed last Sunday.

Waiting for him to break a long one with that great speed he has.

Sure-Oz · 10-27-2004, 05:51 PM

He's got the goofiest looking grill but he can sure fly in the open field. He was solid last weekend for sure.

Mr. Laz · 10-27-2004, 05:52 PM

i think we sent our 1st rounder (12th) to st. louis

and

st. louis gave us Trent Green and a 4th or 5th round draft pick

we then traded down with that 4th or 5th round pick and got another 6th round in the trade.

The 6th was used to pick Blaylock

just going from memory though... but yes, eventually we got Blaylock out of the Trent Green trade IIRC.

**Bob Dole** · 10-27-2004, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UserName

Cool. I'm still not sure how good Blaylock is. I don't think he's as good as he showed last Sunday.

Waiting for him to break a long one with that great speed he has.

You didn't watch last year?

To answer the original question:

Blaylock originally joined the Chiefs as the second of the club’s two draft choices in the fifth round of the 2001 NFL Draft (150th overall).

jspchief · 10-27-2004, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazarus

i think we sent our 1st rounder (12th) to st. louis

and

st. louis gave us Trent Green and a 4th or 5th round draft pick

we then trade down in the 4th or 5th round and got picked up a 6th round in the trade. The 6th was used to pick Blaylock

just going from memory though... but yes, eventually we got Blaylock out of the Trent Green trade IIRC.

...Or you could just read the article in the thread starter that clearly explains exactly how it happened.

Hammock Parties · 10-27-2004, 05:57 PM

Blaylock has done well in spot duty and mop-up time. I DO think he is a very good receiving back. I have my doubts about his ability to carry the running game in #31's absence.

I just get a little nervous when he's in there, thats all.

Spicy McHaggis · 10-27-2004, 05:59 PM

We have an enviable situation here in KC. Having someone as solid as blaylock behind Priest is good piece of mind. Plus what he brings as a sub when he spells Priest. I wish his contract wasn't up at the end of this season.

Mr. Laz · 10-27-2004, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

...Or you could just read the article in the thread starter that clearly explains exactly how it happened.

he had a question mark like he wasnt sure if blaylock was or not

silly me took it as a question and didnt read the dang thing.

besides the article says 5th round... wasn't Blaylock taken in the 6th round?

so maybe that stinkin article is incomplete anyway.

Chieficus · 10-27-2004, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazarus

besides the article says 5th round... wasn't Blaylock taken in the 6th round?

Nope...twas da' 5th...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...e?statsId=5598

mikey23545 · 10-27-2004, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UserName

Blaylock has done well in spot duty and mop-up time. I DO think he is a very good receiving back. I have my doubts about his ability to carry the running game in #31's absence.

I just get a little nervous when he's in there, thats all.

Agreed...I just can't figure out if he's worth blowing a little money on to retain his sevices, or if he'll never be more than what he is now....

And it would really help if we could get a little look at LJ under game situations so we could see if it would be better to keep him instead!!!

milkman · 10-27-2004, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UserName

Blaylock has done well in spot duty and mop-up time. I DO think he is a very good receiving back. I have my doubts about his ability to carry the running game in #31's absence.

I just get a little nervous when he's in there, thats all.

I just don't get it?
He's virtually the same size as Priest, has shown some of the same patience, and has better speed.

He may not be Priest, but he looks pretty damn close when he gets to show his stuff.

Why get nervous?

irishjayhawk · 10-27-2004, 08:38 PM

I agree. Plus hes younger, not taking away from priest, but he should be, for the moment our RotF for now.

My theory is that the majority of the team, regardless of finish, will come back for one last year. They will exit as Vermiel exits.

**Bob Dole** · 10-27-2004, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I just don't get it?
He's virtually the same size as Priest, has shown some of the same patience, and has better speed.

He may not be Priest, but he looks pretty damn close when he gets to show his stuff.

Why get nervous?

Exactly.

Bob Dole is not ashamed to admit that there were times last season that Blaylock carried the ball, and until he was tackled and the network cameras got the right angle, Bob Dole thought it was Holmes.

Hammock Parties · 10-27-2004, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I just don't get it?
He's virtually the same size as Priest, has shown some of the same patience, and has better speed.

He may not be Priest, but he looks pretty damn close when he gets to show his stuff.

Why get nervous?

Fumbles.

10-27-2004, 05:45 PM
Wile_E_Coyote avatar down for remodel Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	Blaylock part of Green trade? Chiefs' Blaylock in Awkward Position By STEVE BRISENDINE AP Sports Writer KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) -- Four touchdowns against the NFL's top run defense would earn most backups a starting job and an exemption from special teams duty. Derrick Blaylock's situation is anything but typical, though. Blaylock scored four of the Kansas City Chiefs' NFL-record eight TDs rushing and followed one of his scores with a tackle on the ensuing kickoff in Sunday's 56-10 victory over Atlanta. But in his fourth NFL season and with the end of his contract approaching, Blaylock finds himself stuck between the greatest back in franchise history and a disgruntled No. 1 draft pick who coach Dick Vermeil still insists will make an impact in Kansas City. "I can't think about that right now," said Blaylock, whose 122 yards this year are already a career high. "I'm focused on this season right now." Blaylock played much of the second half Sunday, finishing with 90 yards on 19 carries, after Priest Holmes - who also scored four touchdowns and set up Blaylock for a gimme 1-yard TD by just missing a fifth - sustained a mild ankle sprain. Holmes did not practice Wednesday, but could start Sunday against Indianapolis, and Vermeil said he expects second-year back Larry Johnson to be active for that game. Johnson, an insurance No. 1 pick in 2003 when Holmes was coming off hip surgery, has been inactive for four of six games this year. Although Vermeil expected to use him against the Colts, Blaylock's status as Holmes' top backup doesn't seem to be in any immediate danger. "I get such a thrill out of seeing a guy do what he has done, coming from where he has come and developing his skills," Vermeil said. "It's a great salute to (running backs coach) James Saxon, who works with him, and the coaches who have confidence in him." Blaylock came to Kansas City in 2001 as part of a deal that brought Pro Bowl quarterback Trent Green to the Chiefs. Kansas City had to give the St. Louis Rams their first- and third-round picks in exchange for Green. But they also demanded an extra fifth-round pick from the Rams in return for those concessions and used that to take Blaylock out of Stephen F. Austin. He was inactive throughout the 2001 season, gained 72 yards in 12 games in 2002 and saw backup duty at running back in 15 games last year, when he ran for 112 yards on 22 carries. "I've been patient the whole time I've been here. I knew eventually I'd get a chance to play," Blaylock said. "The main thing is you've got to be patient and wait your turn, and your turn will come. "I went out there Sunday and got the job done, therefore they have more faith in me." Whether that faith translates into a free-agent offer remains to be seen. This week, Vermeil hinted at a larger role for Blaylock without saying where he envisioned that happening. "This opens the eyes of people around (the league) that he may be a starting running back," Vermeil said. "But to me, that's coaching satisfaction."
Posts: 6,009

10-27-2004, 05:47 PM	#2
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4720478	Cool. I'm still not sure how good Blaylock is. I don't think he's as good as he showed last Sunday. Waiting for him to break a long one with that great speed he has. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,848

10-27-2004, 05:52 PM	#4
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	i think we sent our 1st rounder (12th) to st. louis and st. louis gave us Trent Green and a 4th or 5th round draft pick we then traded down with that 4th or 5th round pick and got another 6th round in the trade. The 6th was used to pick Blaylock just going from memory though... but yes, eventually we got Blaylock out of the Trent Green trade IIRC. __________________
Posts: 95,626

10-27-2004, 05:57 PM	#7
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4720478	Blaylock has done well in spot duty and mop-up time. I DO think he is a very good receiving back. I have my doubts about his ability to carry the running game in #31's absence. I just get a little nervous when he's in there, thats all. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,848

10-27-2004, 05:59 PM	#8
Spicy McHaggis Keep 'er Movin' Join Date: Sep 2004 Casino cash: $9905359	We have an enviable situation here in KC. Having someone as solid as blaylock behind Priest is good piece of mind. Plus what he brings as a sub when he spells Priest. I wish his contract wasn't up at the end of this season. __________________ “We want players who are big, strong, smart, fast, tough and disciplined,” Pioli said, finally bringing an end to the era of Chiefs executives who searched desperately for players who are small, weak, stupid, slow, fragile and unruly.
Posts: 4,963

10-27-2004, 08:38 PM	#13
irishjayhawk Feelin' Alright Join Date: Aug 2004 Casino cash: $10004900	I agree. Plus hes younger, not taking away from priest, but he should be, for the moment our RotF for now. My theory is that the majority of the team, regardless of finish, will come back for one last year. They will exit as Vermiel exits. __________________ "Think about how stupid the average person is. Then remember that half the people in the world are stupider than that." --George Carlin
Posts: 16,887