Online petition to save "Rock & Roll, Part 2"

**Fire Me Boy!** · 08-10-2006, 10:47 AM

http://www.petitiononline.com/Chiefs24/petition.html

jspchief · 08-10-2006, 10:49 AM

Sincerely,

NAMBLA

**Fire Me Boy!** · 08-10-2006, 10:50 AM

Say what you will... I just threw this up because I found out about it. The people that want it base their opinion on the FACT that most people don't even know the name of the song, let along who sang it, that he's in prison or why he's in prison.

**Iowanian** · 08-10-2006, 10:52 AM

Playing that song, still gives royalties to a Kidhumper.

No thanks.

jspchief · 08-10-2006, 10:53 AM

Oh, excellent reasoning. As long as they don't know that they're putting money in the pocket of a pervert, they won't mind.

If you're going to petition, you're wasting your time with the Chiefs. The NFL banned the use of the song, so the Chiefs don't have a choice in the matter.

**Predarat** · 08-10-2006, 10:57 AM

I know a lot of college bands play it. Does Glitterboy still get royalties if they play a recording of a college band?

MOhillbilly · 08-10-2006, 10:58 AM

no thanks- pedos deserve death.

ill sign that petition.

htismaqe · 08-10-2006, 11:05 AM

It doesn't matter if nobody in the entire stadium knows who sings it.

He (or someone he supports) get PAID when we play it.

This petition is in EXTREMELY bad taste.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 08-10-2006, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

Oh, excellent reasoning. As long as they don't know that they're putting money in the pocket of a pervert, they won't mind.

If you're going to petition, you're wasting your time with the Chiefs. The NFL banned the use of the song, so the Chiefs don't have a choice in the matter.

Wrong. The NFL did not ban the use of it. They ASKED teams to not use it. They did NOT ban it.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...g/15190244.htm

And a little interesting site... http://sports-law.blogspot.com/2006/...rality-of.html

jspchief · 08-10-2006, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Wrong. The NFL did not ban the use of it. They ASKED teams to not use it. They did NOT ban it.

My bad. In that case, go on with your effort to line the pockets of a child molester.

Eleazar · 08-10-2006, 11:34 AM

I'm all for tradition. But there's no way the league, the team, or the fanbase should capitulate toward child molestation to any degree no matter how small.

We already have enough leniency towards these subhuman parasites in the judicial system. We should reject it and anyone who supports or displays apathy towards it in any way.

F gary glitter. Maybe him losing these royalty moneys means he won't be able to afford a dictionary to slam his crank in when he's old and gray in prison. Hope so.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 08-10-2006, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

My bad. In that case, go on with your effort to line the pockets of a child molester.

I haven't signed it. But I think that argument is ridiculous... I particularly like this nugget from the above blog. Have the NFL explain this:

3) What About Marv (Albert)?
Marv Albert is the lead play-by-play voice of Westwood One's NFL coverage, calls Monday Night Football games and has called every Super Bowl since 2002. This is true even though, in 1997, he pled guilty to misdemeanor sexual assault charges (after being charged with felony charges of forcible sodomy). Granted, his sexual crime was inflicted upon an adult, but Albert's role with the NFL is clearly larger than Glitter's, and Albert himself is far better known than Glitter. In fact, I had no idea who Glitter was before this story broke, and I never knew or bothered to learn who sung that song. It didn't matter.

greg63 · 08-10-2006, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Wrong. The NFL did not ban the use of it. They ASKED teams to not use it. They did NOT ban it.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...g/15190244.htm

And a little interesting site... http://sports-law.blogspot.com/2006/...rality-of.html

Well in that case the Faders will probably continue to use it.

Chiefnj · 08-10-2006, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Say what you will... I just threw this up because I found out about it. The people that want it base their opinion on the FACT that most people don't even know the name of the song, let along who sang it, that he's in prison or why he's in prison.

You want royalties going to a pedophile just so you can sing "Hey" after a TD?

jspchief · 08-10-2006, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

I haven't signed it. But I think that argument is ridiculous... I particularly like this nugget from the above blog. Have the NFL explain this:

3) What About Marv (Albert)?
Marv Albert is the lead play-by-play voice of Westwood One's NFL coverage, calls Monday Night Football games and has called every Super Bowl since 2002. This is true even though, in 1997, he pled guilty to misdemeanor sexual assault charges (after being charged with felony charges of forcible sodomy). Granted, his sexual crime was inflicted upon an adult, but Albert's role with the NFL is clearly larger than Glitter's, and Albert himself is far better known than Glitter. In fact, I had no idea who Glitter was before this story broke, and I never knew or bothered to learn who sung that song. It didn't matter.

So rather than the NFL being hypocritical, you think they should give all perverts a fair chance to make a buck? Awesome line of logic.

08-10-2006, 10:47 AM
Fire Me Boy! Cast Iron Jedi Join Date: Nov 2004 Casino cash: $9999900 VARSITY	Online petition to save "Rock & Roll, Part 2" http://www.petitiononline.com/Chiefs24/petition.html
Posts: 35,253

08-10-2006, 10:49 AM	#2
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Sincerely, NAMBLA __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207

08-10-2006, 10:50 AM	#3
Fire Me Boy! Cast Iron Jedi Join Date: Nov 2004 Casino cash: $9999900 VARSITY	Say what you will... I just threw this up because I found out about it. The people that want it base their opinion on the FACT that most people don't even know the name of the song, let along who sang it, that he's in prison or why he's in prison.
Posts: 35,253

08-10-2006, 10:52 AM	#4
Iowanian Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Utopia Casino cash: $4768454	Playing that song, still gives royalties to a Kidhumper. No thanks.
Posts: 61,528

08-10-2006, 10:53 AM	#5
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Oh, excellent reasoning. As long as they don't know that they're putting money in the pocket of a pervert, they won't mind. If you're going to petition, you're wasting your time with the Chiefs. The NFL banned the use of the song, so the Chiefs don't have a choice in the matter. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207

08-10-2006, 10:57 AM	#6
Predarat Run Chiefs fans, run!! Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Nashville, TN Casino cash: $9973863	I know a lot of college bands play it. Does Glitterboy still get royalties if they play a recording of a college band?
Posts: 10,776

08-10-2006, 10:58 AM	#7
MOhillbilly Mama Tried Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9949903	no thanks- pedos deserve death. ill sign that petition. __________________ True Son of Liberty
Posts: 23,371

08-10-2006, 11:05 AM	#8
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $10269900	It doesn't matter if nobody in the entire stadium knows who sings it. He (or someone he supports) get PAID when we play it. This petition is in EXTREMELY bad taste.
Posts: 100,022

08-10-2006, 11:34 AM	#11
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	I'm all for tradition. But there's no way the league, the team, or the fanbase should capitulate toward child molestation to any degree no matter how small. We already have enough leniency towards these subhuman parasites in the judicial system. We should reject it and anyone who supports or displays apathy towards it in any way. F gary glitter. Maybe him losing these royalty moneys means he won't be able to afford a dictionary to slam his crank in when he's old and gray in prison. Hope so.
Posts: 80,659