Dorsey sucks

[RedThat]

Plain and simple.

Another bust of a DT

JWhit is right about everything he said about Dorsey. I thought he was supposed to be the centerpiece around the DLine? "Supposively" supposed to be that difference maker?

Yeah

Not even close.

[ChiefsCountry]

[Gonzo]

****Obligatory*****

I think that if we would get some other players around him, he'd improve. It's too early to call him a bust yet. No one else can even get close to the opposing qb.

[xbarretx]

while his footwork and conditioning need some work (off season training and hitting the weights can resolve that) he's doing his job atm and drawing doubleteams. its not his fault our Ends cant beat man coverage. i think just like our passing game last year... people knew we couldnt pass so they stacked 8 or 9 guys in the box to stop the run. this year teams know our ends couldnt sack an old lady crossing the street so they jsut clog the middle and let man on man take care of our rush or.... laugh when our guys WHIFF on tackles.

[StcChief]

what part of it takes more than 10 games to develop a DT haven't you read?

[RedThat]

Originally Posted by StcChief

what part of it takes more than 10 games to develop a DT haven't you read?

Yeah i've heard that numerous times. I dont buy it.

[Mr. Arrowhead]

Originally Posted by RedBull

Yeah i've heard that numerous times. I dont buy it.

So your saying the facts are a myth. It been proven time after time, that DT arent a big impact in their rookie year, just look at the numbers.

[RedThat]

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead

So your saying the facts are a myth. It been proven time after time, that DT arent a big impact in their rookie year, just look at the numbers.

No im saying that. im looking at how he is doing this year. He isnt making any progress. Like Badguy said, he isn't improving as the season goes on.

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by StcChief

what part of it takes more than 10 games to develop a DT haven't you read?

It probably takes more than that for any position, but especially where he is playing, with poor DEs. If JA was still here, he may be getting some more help.

[Brock]

Nothing quite as stupid as throwing a rookie under the bus.

[The Bad Guy]

What's truly concerning to me is he's not improving as the year goes on.

I know the curve is big, and he'll likely snap out of it, but this guy was said to be the most NFL ready DT since Sapp. We all bought that hype.

I'm not saying he sucks yet, but he has a long, long way to go.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

What's truly concerning to me is he's not improving as the year goes on.

I know the curve is big, and he'll likely snap out of it, but this guy was said to be the most NFL ready DT since Sapp. We all bought that hype.

I'm not saying he sucks yet, but he has a long, long way to go.

Sapp's rookie year stat line was 27 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int.

Through 11 games Dorsey has 30 tackles, 1 sack and 1 FF.

[EyePod]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

What's truly concerning to me is he's not improving as the year goes on.

I know the curve is big, and he'll likely snap out of it, but this guy was said to be the most NFL ready DT since Sapp. We all bought that hype.

I'm not saying he sucks yet, but he has a long, long way to go.

Sapp's Stats

YEAR	TEAM	G	TOT	SOLO	AST	PD	SACK	FF	REC	INT	YDS	TD
1995	TAM	16	26	16	10	5	3.0	1	0	1	5	1

Glenn Dorsey Stats

YEAR	TEAM	G	TOT	SOLO	AST	PD	SACK	FF	REC	INT	YDS	TD
2008	KAN	11	30	25	5	0	1.0	1	0	0	0	0

So he has more tackles, a few less sacks, needs an int.... Ummm
These are actually pretty solid stats for a rookie D-Tackle, and Dorsey has 5 more games left. I agree that he isn't as influential as Sapp was his rookie season, but I also thought that Matt Ryan would be terrible, so what do I know.

[Deberg_1990]

Sims > Dorsey

[evolve27]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Sims > Dorsey