would you?

**BossChief** · 01-20-2010, 06:44 AM

Trade Dorsey and our original second for Detroit's #2 overall if Suh was available still?

keg in kc · 01-20-2010, 08:52 AM

The real question is why on earth would detroit do that?

And it all becomes moot when St. Louis selects Suh.

milkman · 01-20-2010, 09:39 AM

Why do you hate Glen Dorsey?

I ask this because you want to send him to ****her, who would **** his career up is short order.

Chiefnj2 · 01-20-2010, 09:52 AM

WOULD YOU stop making dumb ass polls.

**BossChief** · 01-20-2010, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

WOULD YOU stop making dumb ass polls.

what other poll have I made?

Let alone dumbass polls...

RustShack · 01-20-2010, 12:20 PM

Saccopoo · 01-20-2010, 12:22 PM

No, but I would trade Dorsey for a 2nd and a 3rd or 4th to a 4-3 team that could effectively use his talents. And no matter how good Suh is, we already burned a first last year on Jackson and a third on Magee. They better come to play at this point and basically take Suh out of the conversation in terms of a viable pick for the Chiefs.

They need, in no particular order, a C, OL (any of the remaining four positions need an upgrade, and, yes, that means Albert as well), S (both spots), ILB (Belcher looked promising at MLB), DT/NT, WR, TE (yeah, we drafted some last year and brought in Pope, but his route running is horrible), RB (because Charles is going to need help in order to keep him fresh), CB (need some depth past Flowers), OLB (Hali did a great job playing completely out of position (natural LDE in a 4-3) and Vrabel isn't getting any younger), PR/KR (no speed/explosiveness at that spot and you can't ask Charles to keep doing it now that he's full time RB).

Saccopoo · 01-20-2010, 12:22 PM

No, but I would trade Dorsey for a 2nd and a 3rd or 4th to a 4-3 team that could effectively use his talents. And no matter how good Suh is, we already burned a first last year on Jackson and a third on Magee. They better come to play at this point and basically take Suh out of the conversation in terms of a viable pick for the Chiefs.

They need, in no particular order, a C, OL (any of the remaining four positions need an upgrade, and, yes, that means Albert as well), S (both spots), ILB (Belcher looked promising at MLB), DT/NT, WR, TE (yeah, we drafted some last year and brought in Pope, but his route running is horrible), RB (because Charles is going to need help in order to keep him fresh), CB (need some depth past Flowers), OLB (Hali did a great job playing completely out of position (natural LDE in a 4-3) and Vrabel isn't getting any younger), PR/KR (no speed/explosiveness at that spot and you can't ask Charles to keep doing it now that he's full time RB).

'Hamas' Jenkins · 01-20-2010, 12:30 PM

Glenn Dorsey is both better and cheaper than Tyson Jackson, even if he'd be better in another scheme.

I'm not trading Dorsey, I'm trading Jackson.

The Poz · 01-20-2010, 03:07 PM

Someone else is thinkin' something similar:

http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf...ons_rooki.html

Tom Kowalski: Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham was on the Chiefs' staff when Kansas City drafted him and Cunningham really likes the kid. The reason he might be available is because the Chiefs drafted Dorsey as a 4-3 defensive tackle and they've now switched schemes and he's playing a 3-4 end. Neither the Chiefs nor Dorsey is apparently happy with the results and that's why I think the Lions might make a play for him in the off-season. I still think it's a longshot, but it's a shot worth taking.

As for trade value, I'm not sure what he'd cost. I think you might see something a little creative, like swapping of picks in a round or two, as opposed to a straight-up one-for-one deal. We'll see if this heats up as we get closer to the draft.

**the Talking Can** · 01-20-2010, 03:42 PM

we have too many good players, we should trade some of them...

Saccopoo · 01-20-2010, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poz

Someone else is thinkin' something similar:

http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf...ons_rooki.html

Tom Kowalski: Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham was on the Chiefs' staff when Kansas City drafted him and Cunningham really likes the kid. The reason he might be available is because the Chiefs drafted Dorsey as a 4-3 defensive tackle and they've now switched schemes and he's playing a 3-4 end. Neither the Chiefs nor Dorsey is apparently happy with the results and that's why I think the Lions might make a play for him in the off-season. I still think it's a longshot, but it's a shot worth taking.

As for trade value, I'm not sure what he'd cost. I think you might see something a little creative, like swapping of picks in a round or two, as opposed to a straight-up one-for-one deal. We'll see if this heats up as we get closer to the draft.

That's nice and all, but if the Bears were willing to give up a second rounder for Gaines Adams (RIP, but he was a draft bust), Dorsey is worth a second plus. Maybe a straight up for Calvin Johnson?

Hahahahahaha! That's rich!

View Poll Results: would you make the trade?
yes	5	29.41%
no	12	70.59%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

01-20-2010, 06:44 AM
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1574088	would you? Trade Dorsey and our original second for Detroit's #2 overall if Suh was available still?
Posts: 47,174

01-20-2010, 09:39 AM	#3
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	Why do you hate Glen Dorsey? I ask this because you want to send him to **her, who would ** his career up is short order. __________________
Posts: 70,769

01-20-2010, 09:52 AM	#4
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $7813688	WOULD YOU stop making dumb ass polls. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,396

01-20-2010, 12:20 PM	#6
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $4596954	JFC __________________
Posts: 15,049

01-20-2010, 08:52 AM	#2
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	The real question is why on earth would detroit do that? And it all becomes moot when St. Louis selects Suh.
Posts: 58,682

01-20-2010, 12:22 PM	#7
Saccopoo Kindness in words... Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Zion Casino cash: $10025483	No, but I would trade Dorsey for a 2nd and a 3rd or 4th to a 4-3 team that could effectively use his talents. And no matter how good Suh is, we already burned a first last year on Jackson and a third on Magee. They better come to play at this point and basically take Suh out of the conversation in terms of a viable pick for the Chiefs. They need, in no particular order, a C, OL (any of the remaining four positions need an upgrade, and, yes, that means Albert as well), S (both spots), ILB (Belcher looked promising at MLB), DT/NT, WR, TE (yeah, we drafted some last year and brought in Pope, but his route running is horrible), RB (because Charles is going to need help in order to keep him fresh), CB (need some depth past Flowers), OLB (Hali did a great job playing completely out of position (natural LDE in a 4-3) and Vrabel isn't getting any younger), PR/KR (no speed/explosiveness at that spot and you can't ask Charles to keep doing it now that he's full time RB).
Posts: 15,450

01-20-2010, 12:30 PM	#9
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7959572	Glenn Dorsey is both better and cheaper than Tyson Jackson, even if he'd be better in another scheme. I'm not trading Dorsey, I'm trading Jackson. __________________ "When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 74,848

01-20-2010, 03:07 PM	#10
The Poz Enjoyer of things Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Toronto Casino cash: $10012210	Someone else is thinkin' something similar: http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf...ons_rooki.html Tom Kowalski: Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham was on the Chiefs' staff when Kansas City drafted him and Cunningham really likes the kid. The reason he might be available is because the Chiefs drafted Dorsey as a 4-3 defensive tackle and they've now switched schemes and he's playing a 3-4 end. Neither the Chiefs nor Dorsey is apparently happy with the results and that's why I think the Lions might make a play for him in the off-season. I still think it's a longshot, but it's a shot worth taking. As for trade value, I'm not sure what he'd cost. I think you might see something a little creative, like swapping of picks in a round or two, as opposed to a straight-up one-for-one deal. We'll see if this heats up as we get closer to the draft.
Posts: 2,178

01-20-2010, 03:42 PM	#11
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	we have too many good players, we should trade some of them... __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585