|
08-22-2000, 08:29 AM | #2 |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: st. joseph, MO. USA
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Any 90'sw Team without Derrick Thomas is a fraud. [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/mad.gif[/img]
|
Posts: 637
|
08-22-2000, 09:04 AM | #3 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
I agree Chi, I have no idea who could not put DT on the team. We are going to miss him, even if he were a half step slower, in a game last night, the Packer came up behind the Miami QB, sacked him, and I thought to myself DT would have stripped the ball clean.
|
Posts: n/a
|
08-22-2000, 09:33 AM | #4 |
Stroking to the SB Champs!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Flatlands of Kansas
Casino cash: $3043962
|
Not necesssarily a fraud. You need to look at what measure someone uses. If you identify an OLBs primary responsibility as sacking the QB, Derrick was the man. As much as I loved the guy, he was one dimensional. He did go a long way to proving he could be a more complete LB in his last season though. Giddings and Z are looking for complete players, not just ones that get star stats. It's like comparing Alstott to Richardson (or previously Anders), Alstott has more name recognition and star quality because he gets more carries and makes a bigger media splash. Tony Richardson is a more complete FB, because he can block too.
|
Posts: 39,359
|
|
|