#2 Wide Receiver 2016-17

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

There's no argument to be had. The one presented is a very limited and narrow one. Calling Wilson a #2 is incredibly deceptive. While he may be the guy starting opposite of Maclin, he certainly isn't our #2 in terms of targets.

We're talking about a guy who's a #4 in terms of opportunities and comparing his production to legitimate #2 options. He's a #5 option if you count Alex Smith's running.

The real #2 for the Chiefs is Travis Kelce, and his production is right in line with a good, productive 2nd receiving option.

Long story short, this argument is ****ing reeruned.

If we want to gauge Albert Wilson a bit better, we should look at drop %'s and completion %'s when thrown his way. Avg YPC and YAC as well. Those would do a much better job of telling the story than to compare fantasy football points.

Hmmm.. yeah maybe.

I can see that it's hard to narrow down receiver talent, because there really are so many things that go into it.

We know that in general, Alex and I guess Andy are content to spread the ball around.

One could suggest that Albert's targets/opportunities are what they are because the folks in charge have deemed him... unworthy of more focus.

Really, it just comes down to the "ole eye test" of what a player has shown when given opportunities.. and anyone here trying to compare is essentially prone to error and bias.. because no way no how do any of us watch every snap of every team's games each year.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

Hmmm.. yeah maybe.

I can see that it's hard to narrow down receiver talent, because there really are so many things that go into it.

We know that in general, Alex and I guess Andy are content to spread the ball around.

One could suggest that Albert's targets/opportunities are what they are because the folks in charge have deemed him... unworthy of more focus.

Really, it just comes down to the "ole eye test" of what a player has shown when given opportunities.. and anyone here trying to compare is essentially prone to error and bias.. because no way no how do any of us watch every snap of every team's games each year.

For me, all i want to see is that he makes the play when given the chance. I understand that with the way this offense is designed, the way our QB plays and where he is in the pecking order, all i expect is that he makes the play when his number is called. Which he has done imo. I don't recall a play this season where i thought "MOTHER**** GODDAMNIT WILSON". Maclin has had more of those moments than Wilson has. Kelce too, obviously.

Don't get me wrong, if a better option comes along im all for it. But i don't feel that it's a position in dire need of replacement. I don't think there's any position group that's dire or "worst in the league". That's not to say that upgrades can't be made.

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

For me, all i want to see is that he makes the play when given the chance. I understand that with the way this offense is designed, the way our QB plays and where he is in the pecking order, all i expect is that he makes the play when his number is called. Which he has done imo. I don't recall a play this season where i thought "MOTHER**** GODDAMNIT WILSON". Maclin has had more of those moments than Wilson has. Kelce too, obviously.

Don't get me wrong, if a better option comes along im all for it. But i don't feel that it's a position in dire need of replacement. I don't think there's any position group that's dire or "worst in the league". That's not to say that upgrades can't be made.

I respect your philosophy.. but not your memory then. Lately though.. no complaints.