Chiefs Bernard Pollard a predicted Pro Bowler!!

**OnTheWarpath15** · 07-23-2010, 07:04 PM

Seems like your argument, Mic, all boils down to him being expendable because we hadn't invested highly in him like we have Cassel and Jackson.

Those players who we haven't invested as much in, who are making a small salary, are usually the players that make or break a franchise.

Having talented low-priced players is essential to being successful and making a championship run.

Scott Pioli, of ALL ****ING PEOPLE, should know that.

When/if McCluster and Arenas are nothing more than average the next two years, should they be flat-out cut?

They won't be, because Pioli's ego won't allow it.

Pollard wasn't his pick. Therefore, he's gone. And is successful elsewhere.

Meanwhile, his being cut proved nothing - we cut a player with potential without any reward in return.

That's bad decision making any way you slice it.

07-23-2010, 07:04 PM	#11
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2081115	Seems like your argument, Mic, all boils down to him being expendable because we hadn't invested highly in him like we have Cassel and Jackson. Those players who we haven't invested as much in, who are making a small salary, are usually the players that make or break a franchise. Having talented low-priced players is essential to being successful and making a championship run. Scott Pioli, of ALL ****ING PEOPLE, should know that. When/if McCluster and Arenas are nothing more than average the next two years, should they be flat-out cut? They won't be, because Pioli's ego won't allow it. Pollard wasn't his pick. Therefore, he's gone. And is successful elsewhere. Meanwhile, his being cut proved nothing - we cut a player with potential without any reward in return. That's bad decision making any way you slice it.
Posts: 60,758