Check this out: [8.4.2010 5792261] Notice of Copyright Infringement

[Reerun_KC]

Okay this is funny.. My son and I downloaded this movie about 3 months ago and watched it... Nice to see they are on top of things...

Dear Customer,
This message is to advise that Cox Communications has received a notice claiming that you are using your Cox High Speed Internet service to post or transmit material in violation of U.S. Copyright law. We have included a copy of the complaint, which identifies the party raising it and the material claimed to be infringing.
We ask that you review the complaint and, if it is valid, promptly remove or disable access to the infringing material. If you disagree with the claims in the notice, you should contact the sender, and not Cox, to resolve the matter.
As an Internet Service Provider, Cox is responsible, under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"), to advise when we receive a notice asserting infringement by you. We are also required to take appropriate action if further claims are received that you do not resolve.
The material that you post or share online is your responsibility. Cox encourages responsible Internet use, but we do not monitor nor control the information you share. We have a duty, however, to take progressive steps when we received complaints of infringement.
If we continue to receive infringement claims such as this one, concerning your use of our service, we will suspend your account and disable your Internet connection until you confirm you have removed the infringing material.
To learn more about your responsibilities concerning copyrighted material, please refer to our help article at:
http://support.cox.com/sdccommon/asp...a-4c6448f22d05
http://www.respectcopyrights.org/
http://www.riaa.com/ispnoticefaq.php - (General information about DMCA notices)
If you would like to reply to this email, please keep the subject line intact for tracking purposes.
Sincerely,
Cox Customer Security
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Notice ID: 22-94125217
Notice Date: 4 Aug 2010 20:33:17 GMT
Cox Communications Inc.
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that Paramount Pictures Corporation/Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. ("Paramount/Dreamworks") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification. BayTSP's search of the protocol listed below has detected infringements of Paramount/Dreamworks' copyright interests on your IP addresses as detailed in the below report.
BayTSP has reasonable good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of in the below report is not authorized by Paramount/Dreamworks, its agents, or the law. The information provided herein is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, this letter is an official notification to effect removal of the detected infringement listed in the below report. The below documentation specifies the exact location of the
We hereby request that you immediately remove or block access to the infringing material, as specified in the copyright laws, and insure the user refrains from using or sharing with others unauthorized Paramount/Dreamworks' materials in the future (see, 17 U.S.C. 512).
Further, we believe that the entire Internet community benefits when these matters are resolved cooperatively. We urge you to take immediate action to stop this infringing activity and inform us of the results of your actions. We appreciate your efforts toward this common goal.
Please respond indicating the actions you have taken to resolve this matter. The provided link has been assigned to this matter. http://webreply.baytsp.com/webreply/...20a281a16c618a
For email correspondence, please reference the above Notice ID in the subject line. mailtoaramount@copyright-compliance.com?subject=RE%3A%20Notice%20ID%3A%2022%2D94125217%20Notice%20of%20Unauthorized%20Use%20o f%20Paramount%20Pictures%20Corporation%2FDreamworks%20Animation%20SKG%2C%20Inc%2E%20Property
Nothing in this letter shall serve as a waiver of any rights or remedies of Paramount/Dreamworks with respect to the alleged infringement, all of which are expressly reserved. Should you need to contact me, I may be reached at the below address.
Regards,
Mark Ishikawa
Chief Executive Officer
BayTSP, Inc.
PO Box 1314
Los Gatos, CA 95031
v: 408-341-2305
f: 408-341-2399
paramount@copyright-compliance.com
*pgp public key is available on the key server at http://pgp.mit.edu
Note: The information transmitted in this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
This infringement notice contains an XML tag that can be used to automate the processing of this data. If you would like more information on how to use this tag please contact BayTSP.
Evidentiary Information:
Notice ID: 22-94125217
Initial Infringement Timestamp: 4 Aug 2010 18:15:32 GMT
Recent Infringement Timestamp: 4 Aug 2010 18:15:32 GMT
Infringers IP Address: 68.12.209.193
Protocol: BitTorrent
Infringed Work: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Infringing File Name: Transformers 2 Revenge Of The Fallen DVDRip XviD-MAXSPEED
Infringing File Size: 1469734654
Bay ID: 19abc3ebf9ca970b72520f4eb430d93e340b368e|1469734654
Port ID: 52080
Infringer's DNS Name: ip68-12-209-193.ok.ok.cox.net
Infringer's User Name:
http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS/ACNS2v1.xsd" xmlns="http://www.movielabs.com/ACNS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
94125217
Open
BayTSP, Inc. on behalf of Paramount Pictures
Compliance Manager, Compliance Team
P.O. Box 1314, Los Gatos, California 95031 United States of America
(408) 341-2300,(408) 341-2399
paramount@copyright-compliance.com>
Cox Communications Inc.
abuse@cox.net>
2010-08-04T18:15:32.000Z
68.12.209.193
52080
ip68-12-209-193.ok.ok.cox.net
BitTorrent

1
No
2010-08-04T18:15:32.000Z

Transformers 2 Revenge Of The Fallen DVDRip XviD-MAXSPEED
1469734654
- ---End ACNS XML
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 8.0
iEYEARECAAYFAkxZzxEACgkQ9Y9NMGKi0WhvEQCeN7/8TIrklJQ04IkYTUgHP0Au
2UcAn1i0ZZq/yE5ThlDiDUvEhJI/cPNA
=Dygc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Omaha

Wow, you're making quite an assumption about someone you've never met.

I don't want to come off as douchey as you just did, so I'm not saying this to claim that I'm an expert on the subject. I've spent a fair amount of time in/around the music business. I've recorded CDs, toured the midwest, and played shows with several national acts. I've got friends who've gone on to get signed an have some decent success and some who haven't.

I don't give a shit about your possible credentials or your length of time on this message board. You clearly don't know as much as you think you know so you try to bullyyour way through discussions.

You'd be wise to not be such a condescending prick. This was a pretty cool discussion until you decided to try to bully it to death.

Reaper had it right: **** you.

You're crybaby pussy. My "possible" credentials?

Good luck, Know-It-All. There's clearly a reason why you're stuck in Omaha.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Omaha

In the '90s. This is what happens when you jump in & throw a tantrum in mid conversation.

Oh, just **** off.

How many bands were signed from a myspace account in the 90's Mp3.com?

And how many of those bands (I'll let YOU provide the number) had ANY success?

You're an idiot, plain an simple.

I hope that's workin' for ya.

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

I haven't read the thread, so I don't know the exact context of this argument but I'd imagine Dane/Reaper/Brock are probably arguing that Iron Maiden are still relevant in the fact that they can still sell tickets and promote large tours.

Not that they're out there cranking out brand new albums that everybody cares about and putting up #1 singles on FM radio. I could be wrong, but I'm not going to read any further back than this first page anyhow.

#1 songs have very little to do with relevance. AC/DC never had a #1 song, but they sold out concerts for decades

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Reaper had it right: **** you.

You're crybaby pussy. My "possible" credentials?

Good luck, Know-It-All. There's clearly a reason why you're stuck in Omaha.

I'll ****ing kill you.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

#1 songs have very little to do with relevance. AC/DC never had a #1 song, but they sold out concerts for decades


I'll ****ing kill you.

Just to clarify, I was referring to be a somewhat talented musician, singer, etc. and not currently working in Nashville, Los Angeles, New York or Miami.

You know, he did have a CD!

[Brock]

This is how screwed up things are. Tom Petty just put out his best record in 15 years and can't get it played on the radio. He just played halftime at the Super Bowl and did a spot on SNL this year, but there isn't a place for him on FM radio?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Brock

This is how screwed up things are. Tom Petty just put out his best record in 15 years and can't get it played on the radio. He just played halftime at the Super Bowl and did a spot on SNL this year, but there isn't a place for him on FM radio?

It's because record labels don't have the money necessary to grease the program directors at Clear Channel, etc.

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by Brock

This is how screwed up things are. Tom Petty just put out his best record in 15 years and can't get it played on the radio. He just played halftime at the Super Bowl and did a spot on SNL this year, but there isn't a place for him on FM radio?

It's an all blues album. Otherwise it would get play in some formats, I'm sure. Still, the record debuted at #2 on the Billboard charts.

(I think that The Last DJ is a way better record than Mojo but that's a different discussion).

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Oh, just **** off.

How many bands were signed from a myspace account in the 90's Mp3.com?

And how many of those bands (I'll let YOU provide the number) had ANY success?

You're an idiot, plain an simple.

I hope that's workin' for ya.

WTF are you even talking about?

It appears you lost track and have now resorted to namecalling. Nice.

[Omaha]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Reaper had it right: **** you.

You're crybaby pussy. My "possible" credentials?

Good luck, Know-It-All. There's clearly a reason why you're stuck in Omaha.

Like I said, I don't claim to know it all. That's what you do.

I just claim to know more than you.

[tk13]

I caught the end of one of Petty's new songs on a AAA format station... I'm guessing he will still get played there. His last couple albums have. That's where a lot of the "classic" guys seem to go nowadays when they put out new material. But there aren't as many AAA format stations, I don't think. I don't know the current state of KC radio but I don't think they've really had one in the past.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by tk13

I caught the end of one of Petty's new songs on a AAA format station... I'm guessing he will still get played there. His last couple albums have. That's where a lot of the "classic" guys seem to go nowadays when they put out new material. But there aren't as many AAA format stations, I don't think. I don't know the current state of KC radio but I don't think they've really had one in the past.

You may hear his stuff sporadically, but I guess my point is more that Petty hasn't forgotten how to write hit records. His songs are as good as they've ever been, but he's not likely to have any more big hits and the situation with radio is the real reason for it.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Omaha

Like I said, I don't claim to know it all. That's what you do.

I just claim to know more than you.

Yeah, you're a ****ing moron. And your claim is absolutely baseless.

It's typical, too. I had a few friends that were active in the KC music scene come out to Los Angeles. A few talented players that thought they were songwriters as well.

When given the opportunity to interact with working professionals, whether it was producers, songerwriters or other musicians, they couldn't take the criticism, refused to learn or absorb any knowledge and usually shortly thereafter, went back home. Some stayed a little longer than others but ultimately, none of them did a damn thing.

Of course to this day, they still believe they were wronged and know more than those they encountered. It's sad and pathetic.

And FTR, you don't know jack****ing shit.

[Slainte]

An article from 2007. Relevant to this thread, though...

Bruce: Magic Refused Radio Play

Bruce Springsteen should be very happy. He has the No. 1 album, a possible Grammy for Best Album of the Year for "Magic," an album full of singles and a sold-out concert tour.

Alas, there’s a hitch: Radio will not play "Magic." In fact, sources tell me that Clear Channel has sent an edict to its classic rock stations not to play tracks from "Magic." But it’s OK to play old Springsteen tracks such as "Dancing in the Dark," "Born to Run" and "Born in the USA."

Just no new songs by Springsteen, even though it’s likely many radio listeners already own the album and would like to hear it mixed in with the junk offered on radio.

Why? One theory, says a longtime rock insider, "is that the audience knows those songs. Of course, they’ll never know these songs if no one plays them."

"Magic," by the way, has sold more than 500,000 copies since its release on Oct. 2 and likely will hit the million mark. That’s not a small achievement these days, and one that should be embraced by Clear Channel.

But what a situation: The No. 1 album is not being played on any radio stations, according to Radio & Records, which monitors such things. Nothing. The rock songs aren’t on rock radio, and the two standout "mellow" tracks — "Magic" and "Devil’s Arcade" — aren’t even on "lite" stations.

The singles-kinda hits, "Radio Nowhere" and "Living in the Future" — which would have been hits no questions asked in the '70s, '80s and maybe even the '90s, also are absent from Top 40.

What to do? Columbia Records is said to be readying a remixed version of "The Girls in their Summer Clothes," a poppy Beach Boys-type track that has such a catchy hook fans were singing along to it at live shows before they had the album. Bruce insiders are hopeful that with a push from Sony, "Girls" will triumph.

I’m not so sure.

Clear Channel seems to have sent a clear message to other radio outlets that at age 58, Springsteen simply is too old to be played on rock stations. This completely absurd notion is one of many ways Clear Channel has done more to destroy the music business than downloading over the last 10 years. It’s certainly what’s helped create satellite radio, where Springsteen is a staple and even has his own channel on Sirius.

It’s not just Springsteen. There is no sign at major radio stations of new albums by John Fogerty or Annie Lennox, either. The same stations that should be playing Santana’s new singles with Chad Kroeger or Tina Turner are avoiding them, too.

Like Springsteen, these "older" artists have been relegated to something called Triple A format stations — i.e. either college radio or small artsy stations such as WFUV in the Bronx, N.Y., which are immune from the Clear Channel virus of pre-programming and where the number of plays per song is a fraction of what it is on commercial radio.

By Roger Friedman
Fox News

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Omaha

In the '90s. This is what happens when you jump in & throw a tantrum in mid conversation.

Earlier:

Originally Posted by Omaha

I was an indie musician throughout the '90s and we didn't have myspace, youtube, internet radio, satelite radio, or anything to get our music out. We had to beg people to come to our shows, book studio time & spend everything we had to have CDs printed. It was much more difficult to get our music out there & fewer bands were able to do it.

Originally Posted by Omaha

WTF are you even talking about?

Here's what I'm talking about:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Oh, just **** off.

How many bands were signed from a myspace account in the 90's Mp3.com?

And how many of those bands (I'll let YOU provide the number) had ANY success?

You're an idiot, plain an simple.

I hope that's workin' for ya.

The idea that the internet could have been some kind of panacea for indie and unsigned bands was pure horseshit.

Very, very, very few artists broke through due a myspace or mp3.com account in the 90's and quite frankly, the mp3 and filesharing age has all but killed the major label record business.

[Bugeater]

Annie Lennox? Who the hell wants to listen to that anyway?