|
|
06-01-2012, 02:04 AM | #1 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $2309112
|
Ok, you are welcome to your opinion. Now, because you believe that.. does it A) make it a scientific fact that it is a health risk and B) give a valid justification for curtailing a property owner's right to chose a smoking or non-smoking environment for his business?
Clearly no. Just because something is gross doesn't make it harmful nor should it be a legal justification. Next... |
Posts: 19,591
|
06-01-2012, 02:58 AM | #2 | |
**** off
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York
Casino cash: $7181882
|
Quote:
__________________
"**** up once, lose two teeth....” |
|
Posts: 5,218
|
06-01-2012, 03:03 AM | #3 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $2309112
|
I'm completely on board with you there. If I owned a bar in a town that allowed smoking, I'd probably designate a smoking area and install a completely separate air filtration system. If done properly (although at a pretty hefty expense) you can almost entirely eliminate even the odor of smoke if you know what you are doing. Or I'd just restrict smoking to an outdoor patio... but those choices should be mine to make.
|
Posts: 19,591
|
06-02-2012, 06:50 AM | #4 | |
u b illian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DooDah
Casino cash: $10009436
|
this, and I'm a former smoker
Quote:
B) Absolutely NOT! Business owner can do as he wishes and patrons can do as they wish, including not patroning said business. Get gov't out of our business. |
|
Posts: 7,287
|
|
|