Top 5 Pick Success Rate

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Again, a passing of the buck.

You think that we're new to this tactic here?

It's called deflection, and it's all you ever do.

You don't say why you oppose one of these players. You offer no substantive reason why they may not succeed, you merely make a series of claims with absolutely no evidence to support them.

There may well be evidence to make such an argument, but without it, your argumentative style is the equivalent of a vagrant shouting from a milk crate.

Here's a simple lesson that was obviously never taught to you

Claim+evidence-counterargument+refutation=Argument

All you do right now is make claims. Hell, even that is a bit of a stretch.

Wow! If you weren't completely wrong, I'd feel bad about myself. Let's try it again, genius, and I'll type in easy, separated points just for you.

1.) I don't care who the Chiefs take at #3, or even if they use the pick rather than trading it.

2.) I trust that Pioli will have done his due diligence and will choose appropriately.

3.) I can understand why some people want to take Stafford/Sanchez.

4.) I can understand why some people DON'T want to take Stafford/Sanchez.

5.) The value of a blown pick at QB is NOT greater than the value of a successful pick at another position just because you could have drafted that other position successfully at a lower position. The reason is that the value of a bust is zero if it's a complete washout and nearly zero if it's just a crap player, and the negative impact of such a bust can be significant.

6.) I think it's moronic to attack people just because they don't like these QBs.