Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Yea because Reiter isn’t close with Pat and wouldn’t give them a chance to match any offer.
They clearly didn’t want Reiter back that bad. It’s obvious. Put your thinking cap on.
All of this started because you are arguing against the blatantly obvious fact that Reiter’s run blocking was an issue. Do you really think his run blocking wasn’t an issue? Are you that ****ing stupid?
He allowed 0 sacks in 2 years on a passing team and they made a half ass effort to bring him back and in the end let him walk. That tells you everything you need to know about how they view his weakness. If that’s not enough, they signed a guy that’s a much better run blocker. Put your thinking cap on.
|
So they offered a contract to someone they "clearly didn't want back". Makes sense.