Chiefs Fisher to LT?

mcaj22 · 04-09-2014, 11:23 AM

It shouldnt be considered a negative outlook if you as a fan are cheering for the team succeed when they acquire a 29 year old QB to lead the team, and you actually want/wish that QB would lead the team far and maybe even to the Super Bowl. There is no other reason to justify acquiring him, and if you spin it to just "be competitive/tread water/transition QB" then YOU are actually the negative one against the Chiefs.

The problem is Alex Smith, the QB everyone on here cheers for needs help. A lot of people, on here, realize that, and it comes off negative that they push the agenda of "please get some ****ing help around our QB so he can keep us in games/win them without the other 21 starters (mostly the 11 on defense) pissing it away/losing it.

Russel Wilson doesn't win a Super Bowl without all the help he had on that defense.

But that's the problem with the Chiefs, people want FA help because the Chiefs aren't getting much help from the draft. If the Chiefs actually had good ****ing drafts that helped the team nobody would give a shit about FAs. But the Chiefs are a franchise that walks the line of getting no help from the draft and doing nothing in FA and YOU CANT DO BOTH LIKE THAT. You either need to get some FA help if your drafts are shitty or stay out of FA if you have good drafts. The Chiefs don't do either of those well. And that's the conundrum.

04-09-2014, 11:23 AM	#9
mcaj22 MVP Join Date: Feb 2010 Casino cash: $10014454	It shouldnt be considered a negative outlook if you as a fan are cheering for the team succeed when they acquire a 29 year old QB to lead the team, and you actually want/wish that QB would lead the team far and maybe even to the Super Bowl. There is no other reason to justify acquiring him, and if you spin it to just "be competitive/tread water/transition QB" then YOU are actually the negative one against the Chiefs. The problem is Alex Smith, the QB everyone on here cheers for needs help. A lot of people, on here, realize that, and it comes off negative that they push the agenda of "please get some **ing help around our QB so he can keep us in games/win them without the other 21 starters (mostly the 11 on defense) pissing it away/losing it. Russel Wilson doesn't win a Super Bowl without all the help he had on that defense. But that's the problem with the Chiefs, people want FA help because the Chiefs aren't getting much help from the draft. If the Chiefs actually had good **ing drafts that helped the team nobody would give a shit about FAs. But the Chiefs are a franchise that walks the line of getting no help from the draft and doing nothing in FA and YOU CANT DO BOTH LIKE THAT. You either need to get some FA help if your drafts are shitty or stay out of FA if you have good drafts. The Chiefs don't do either of those well. And that's the conundrum.
Posts: 11,886